I think I get what you're saying and I agree picks are important. I think it's natural though that when a team gets good, priorities shift. The impact of trading these picks is also lessened by the fact that earlier we were sellers and picked up a bunch of picks. I would say that each trade should be evaluated on it's own merit and if what you get in return is good enough then I think trading picks is OK, for example one 1st/2nd was used to get Andersen who's the best starter we've had since Belfour, definitely worth it IMO. And then the other was used to get rid of Marleau, if we don't do that then what happens? Are we unable to keep Kapanen and Johnsson? How much are those guys worth? I'm also not sure we can look at all these trades and call it a trend, after all only one of these 1st rounders was traded by Dubas, the other was Lou so there's that as well.
If we resign Clifford (and I believe that is the plan) I just love this trade. He's exactly what this team has been missing IMHO and I think he could have a huge impact on our overall compete level. If I'm right then he alone will be worth what we gave up.
Picks have value, no question about it. But I wouldn't overstate it either. Someone posted somewhere the guys that were picked with the picks we gave up for Boyle and Plecanek, doesn't look like those picks amounted to much. Now of course that doesn't always happen and if we draft well we could get really good players in the 2nd round, I'm just saying we shouldn't overstate the value of picks outside the 1st round. Picks have value, no doubt about it but we shouldn't get dogmatic about it and say never trade picks either. I'll say it again - judge every move on it's own merit and I like the moves Dubas has made, I like them a lot.