Yeah not seeing the logic here with the moves:
- Were compressing our talent into even less lines which is moving in the wrong direction imo
- we are isolating JT with 2 other guys who aren’t overly fast either
- we take our PKers to add in a guy who really offers us nothing at all
At times in a game where needed makes a ton of sense, but I don’t think it should be the starting configuration of our lineup for a game
But the 3rd line isn’t improved in this scenario? He weakened to the 2nd line to help the top line and the 3rd stayed roughly or maybe exactly the same
I don't think it'll necessarily work, but just that there's more to it than "first line strong". What I mean by the 3rd as independently decent, is independent of the core 4 stars. I think the issues our coaches have had with spreading the stars over 3 lines is providing sufficient ice time for each. So, the 3rd line being OK without them would help a lot.
I don't mind the 2nd line being slow; like, Tavares and Pacioretty work because they have the same pace. Knies provides a good forecheck, and if they get the puck low, they can exploit their size. However, they may get exposed on the rush.