member 96824
Guest
Sounds like Pierre just speculating...but if that’s the case I’m going to be so pumped for Torey.
Getcho money
I think Pierre should probably look to Spurgeon as Krug’s comparable though, not Josi.
Globe:
“There is nothing personal about it,” Krug said. “It’s business on both ends. Teams have to put the best team forward, spending a certain amount of money. Athletes have one shot at making all their money.”
He did say he was “very opposed” to signing a one-year contract. Before his current, expiring pact — four years at $5.25 million per — in 2016, Krug played the two prior years on one-year deals ($1.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively).
“This is my time,” he said, “in terms of my value at its peak and I have the ability. I’m in a position now where I need to make the most of it.”
Sounds like Pierre just speculating...but if that’s the case I’m going to be so pumped for Torey.
Getcho money
I think Pierre should probably look to Spurgeon as Krug’s comparable though, not Josi.
I think both are rather poor comparisons. Spurgeon slightly closer because krugs a fair amount better offensively. Spurgeon and Josi both get 2:00+ minutes of penalty kill time per game and their offensive/defensive zone starts are close to 50/50.
While krug gets more offensive opportunities than any defender in the nhl and doesn’t play on the PK.
In almost every statistical sense he is closest to Tyson Barrie. From points, power play time, PK time, zone starts.
Barrie’s a UFA too. Wonder what he does to the market and which of the two end up where. Got to think Krug gets a little more b/c of the leadership and playoff performances (not that Barries a slacker in either) but who knows what GMs around the league at think of the two of them.
This ! I would have liked for the Hobbit to stay. If he is leaving the B's will be looking for someone else to do what he does. Good Luck with that.Reading this has made my eyes glaze over. Even in this market, I don’t see how he doesn’t get comparable to Spurgeon.
He’s gunna get paaaaaiddd. He deserves it.
It’ll suck to see him go.
Did anybody see the ridiculous KPD column in the Globe? With zero original reporting, he claims the B's might prefer to sign Pietrangelo for $9M and let both Krug and Chara walk. As far as I can tell, this is completely empty speculation on his part, and it makes no sense. If the B's are worried they can't keep Krug without blowing up the cap, then why would they sign Pietrangelo, who's already 30, to an even greater price? Sure, Pietrangelo is better, but not all that much better, and Chara is still a very good shutdown defender. If KPD had insights into Sweeney's thinking, fine, but he's never shown much evidence of having great sources among B's management.
Did anybody see the ridiculous KPD column in the Globe? With zero original reporting, he claims the B's might prefer to sign Pietrangelo for $9M and let both Krug and Chara walk. As far as I can tell, this is completely empty speculation on his part, and it makes no sense. If the B's are worried they can't keep Krug without blowing up the cap, then why would they sign Pietrangelo, who's already 30, to an even greater price? Sure, Pietrangelo is better, but not all that much better, and Chara is still a very good shutdown defender. If KPD had insights into Sweeney's thinking, fine, but he's never shown much evidence of having great sources among B's management.
Barrie’s a UFA too. Wonder what he does to the market and which of the two end up where. Got to think Krug gets a little more b/c of the leadership and playoff performances (not that Barries a slacker in either) but who knows what GMs around the league at think of the two of them.
Imagine saying something like Krug is "Almost" Pietrangelo ?.......Imagine thinking these players are even close.....Amazing...Krug is not even in same conversation as Pietrangelo. If the argument were AP at 9 vs Chara/Krug at 8 easy choice for me and makes sense, however I don't think that this line of thinking is in play in reality.
Brodie would be an interesting stopgap at LD.