If the Bruins sign him for the money you guys are talking they are out of their minds.
So a 2nd pair 40+ point defensman who can play 20+ minutes a night isn't worth 4.75-5M? I think you're out of you're mind.
So a 2nd pair 40+ point defensman who can play 20+ minutes a night isn't worth 4.75-5M? I think you're out of you're mind.
I don't think Krug''s a 2nd pairing guy though. Really good, OFD, PP specialist #5
He's that out of necessity. I wonder how many other teams would have him on their 2nd pair.
4 years 15 m
4 years @ 5.25M per year is my guess. Not a huge fan of his defensive play - he is a power play specialist but I guess thats the going rate.
Spurgeon just inked a 4 yr/$5.19m per extension last year and I think Krug is better than he is. You could make the argument that Spurgeon is a little better in his own end, but Krug puts up more points. If the B's can ink him to a four or five year deal in the $4.75m range (+/-), that would be a very good signing IMO.
He is not worth over 5.One way player who had a bad year.If scored more goals last year I might agree But he loses battles steady and weak on boards and in front of net.
5 years at 23 million is my guess.
He is not worth over 5.One way player who had a bad year.If scored more goals last year I might agree But he loses battles steady and weak on boards and in front of net.