Value of: Top 6 forward to chicago

[Mrfenn92]

Wondering who is looking to not so much give away a top 6 forward but who has a spare to make a trade and what’s the return looking like.

Hockey trade or a futures

Taylor hall out for the year

Click to read more...

 

[Qward]

I've been Jack Campbell has been known to play forward frm time to time.

 

[Mrfenn92]

W

I've been Jack Campbell has been known to play forward frm time to time.

With the hawks roster he probably could

 

[Toronto makebeleifs]

Long term, there probably won't really be anything of interest til the off-season. Short term, a guy like duclair would at least have the wheels to keep up and wouldn't be cost prohibitive.

 

[banks]

Keep in mind, Chicago has a ton of cap space. And by signing Foligno and Perry this offseason they've proven they don't care about overpaying someone for this season.

So overpaid guys on a 1 year deal seem like the logical choice they'd target.

 

[EK392000]

Keep in mind, Chicago has a ton of cap space. And by signing Foligno and Perry this offseason they've proven they don't care about overpaying someone for this season.

So overpaid guys on a 1 year deal seem like the logical choice they'd target.

Back up the Brinks truck for Patty Kane then

 

[oceanchild]

Garland and Beauviller are middle 6 players, the Canucks can lose one of them

 

[Peter Griffin]

Could Connor Murphy be moved?

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

Montreal wants to know if you're looking for top 6 forwards


Or

Top 6

 

[Mrfenn92]

Could Connor Murphy be moved?

Sure

 

[bossram]

Keep in mind, Chicago has a ton of cap space. And by signing Foligno and Perry this offseason they've proven they don't care about overpaying someone for this season.

So overpaid guys on a 1 year deal seem like the logical choice they'd target.

Anthony Beauvillier from Vancouver. Expiring contract.

Canucks would like to free up the cap space to make more in-season additions.

 

[Peter Griffin]

Sure

Garland for Murphy perhaps?

 

[barkovcanfinnish]

PK88 time

 

[Mrfenn92]

Garland for Murphy perhaps?

Murphy no trade clause might be a issue but sure from this hawks fan

 

[EddieTheEagle]

Garland for Murphy perhaps?

No thank you. I feel like we could get Garland for far less than Murphy, and could use Murphy to return better assets than Connor Garland.

Not that I don't like the player or think they are comparable, I am just factoring Vancouver's desire to shed cap moving forward and the lack of urgency for the Hawks to really need a move like this.

 

[razor ray]

Could Connor Murphy be moved?

Hawks would probably even eat half for the right draft pick.

 

[Madap]

McDavid?

 

[Peter Griffin]

No thank you. I feel like we could get Garland for far less than Murphy, and could use Murphy to return better assets than Connor Garland.

Not that I don't like the player or think they are comparable, I am just factoring Vancouver's desire to shed cap moving forward and the lack of urgency for the Hawks to really need a move like this.

I’m fine with moving Garland without Murphy coming back but I imagine the Canucks would only do that if they had another deal lined up for a defenseman or were ready to sign Ethan Bear.

 

[Djp]

Olofsson is available

 

[Andre Palot]

You can have Palat for future considerations.

 

[biturbo19]

Olofsson is available

Olofsson actually seems like a pretty good fit. He's obviously on the outs in Buffalo, but he can score goals. Might be exactly the sort of player who is well suited to be a "good player on a bad team".

 

[tkb81]

Arvidsson on the Kings once he's back from injury could be available

 

[Vitto79]

The plan is too stink so maybe a cap dump with a pick

 

[Iwishihadaspacebar]

JG Pageau? Mantha? Dvorak wouldn't be a ridiculous idea, but he gets paid more than his cap hit, which wouldn't be very attractive.

There actually aren't too many players who need to be dumped by middling or competing teams.

 

[waitin425]

Wouldn't it be something if McDavid went there in FA?