i could see a package of toffoli and chariot keeping yous in the race till drew gets back . both can be retained on as well . your first and a b prospect maybe ?
Value of: Top 4 D to LAK
- Thread starter KingsHockey24
- Start date
go4hockey
Registered User
go4hockey
Registered User
Zero chance we would move the 1st and definitely not for that. I love TT but he is a 20 goal guy in LA if we’re lucky.
no
no x 2
Gauthier is good.
Like I've been saying, he needs a chance on a line w/Chytil + LaF [who already show they look good together].
No on moving Nils.
People don't like hearing it but the math, the play on paper is sell high Lindy, make space for first Reunanen [who we will sell later this year once value high enuf and he is showcased].
We then get Jones up here.
-----------
When I get a chance I will say this in response to unfounded criticism in the other thread.
They want a 6'1 or bigger LD and Lindy is an inch less, and like 9 or so pounds lighter but plays bigger. I concealed nothing, and asked if their guidelines were rigid or flexible and apparently close is not close enough.
{I am a bit confused in that they have been calling for KAM, but the last post on the subject was for someone with offense, i.e., a scoring or QB defenseman.}
If that is what they want then fine, let them chase that unicorn.
Maybe the Blues will consider something around
Parayko + lesser pick
for
Byfield + better pick
In any event, as much as it would be nice to get Villardi, we must not overay to get him, mindful:
- we do not have elc blue chip surplus
- we do not have an immediate pivot problem now that Zib is locked up
Strome buh bye, can't afford him long term
still leaves...
Zob
Chytil
Kravtsov/Barron
Blais/Rooney ++
these grass is greener threads are erroneous
something reasonable around Lindgren + for Vilardi + is fine
everything else is not a match or a need
ManofSteel55
Registered User
I would be fine with trading Barrie but I don't see any realistic targets that would help Edmonton. Strand+ maybe but I don't know what the + is.
And how often have you been told now that Lindgreen for Vilardi is not even remotely reasonable ?
Vilardi is in the group of players that only go for elite wingers
That is your errenous opinion.
You grossly undervalue Lindgren
only reason he is available over some of our elcs
is:
need cap to extend
Fox, LaF, Kakko and possibly Kravtsov
as well as Blais
we can short term juggle moving Strome + Geo,
but we should endeavor to squeeze every bit of cap until Trouba
either is dealt in 3 seasons or before if he will let us.
Neither side is budging
which is fine
we are not underselling our bluest blue chips or our more productive players
If you get a better deal elsewhere
congrats
if not, these are NYR terms
accept it or live with what you have
drop mic
finis
Finally
We were at the point of no trades at all weeks ago
I don't want anything from the Rangers. It's you guys open new threads on a daily base.
We are really done here
Why would the Oilers want Strand at all? Saw him with the Reign multiple times last season. Meh.
Kings are stacked with forward prospects. They should trade one for D from a team with lots of D prospects. I suggest Justin Barron or maybe Calen Addison.
KingsHockey24
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2013
- 14,498
- 13,256
Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
ManofSteel55
Registered User
I think he has upside still and could fit in on our third pair, but I don't think he would be even close to enough. I also don't believe that we would trade Barrie for a prospect forward at this point. I think Holland wants to improve his NHL roster, not his futures stock.
Reaper45
Registered User
Strand plays better in the NHL than in the A for whatever reason.
Small sample size. Caleb Jones did too (he looked like baby Seth early on).
I'd don't think he's a bad D prospect (Durzi is horrible though). I fail to see why a team would trade a roster player like Barrie for him.
Raccoon Jesus
Draft em but don't play em
We do but the org hates him and loves Maatta.
He's an odd duck because he looks like a completely different skillset in the NHL.
Dude is absolutely wiring tape to tape passes harder than anyone we've had in years and plays much more aggressively.
You're probably right that given more time and responsibility that play-up adrenaline or whatever it is unravels a bit, but you wouldn't even think it was the same player.
All that said unless a team 100% believed in that there's no reason to give up a roster player for what could be an illusion.
Someone who already scores 30+ goals being of reasonable age or a youngster with the potential to score 30+ goals
Reaper45
Registered User
Oh I agree he’s not worth Barrie at all. But there is something going on when he’s in the NHL as opposed to the A.
apocalypse
Dean Lombardi's Yes Man
Is lundkvist even a top 4 guy? By the looks of it he's getting bottom pairing minutes.
deaderhead28
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 5,413
- 3,972
No thanks. Moore is going no where Not interest in Kerfoot at all Last thing the kings need is another center
Avilaj07
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2016
- 2,076
- 1,594
Not sure if you're aware but Kerfoot plays LW as well which is what he's currently playing this year and last years playoffs. He's a much better winger then center.
Ad
Latest posts
-
Who is more dominant in their sport: Ohtani, McDavid or Mahomes?- Latest: John Mandalorian
-
-
-
-
