Probably unpopular opinion, but I think they should trade Gio. I don't think they're one trade away from being a contender, so why not move a guy that has good value now, but probably won't be as good when they are ready to be legit?
I'm looking at a team like Winnipeg who is strong on the RH side on D but could stand to strengthen the left side, and has one of the strongest prospect pools going.
Not going to take a guess at what that trade looks like, just think they'd be ideal partners.
So you're suggesting this...
Calgary trades Giordano a top pairing defender (imo and a lot of Flames fans he's undoubtedly a #1, but i can't say anything from other fans and hockey insiders, but hes in Norris trophy races for the last 3 years? and this year, so im sure he's noticed as a #1 by a lot of hockey geniuses out there,)
He can play defense, has an excellent first pass, can score and create plays, takes on top competition, he can play both sides but he's better on the left, and then let's go to left depth at defense without him....
Brodie (top pair)
Kulak (2nd pair unless Valimaki crushes at training camp)
Valimaki (the closest LD ready, 3rd pair)
Kylington (im pretty sure is the other leftie?)
But we have Hamilton, Hamonic, Stone, Bart(puke), Andersson, Fox as righties (I'm only going with top 2 prospects for each side or kids i see hitting the nhl).
You honestly think Calgary should trade their best defensive defender?(imo hes better than Hamonic at defense but it's probably close) leave ourselves with no left d depth? Stone undoubtedly makes the most sense or Brodie if BT wants a shake up, I don't think he'd entertain the idea of losing a Hamonic trade by giving him away for less than what he paid (and im talking about an unprotected 1st)