I don't understand how Aquilini, an investor, doesn't understand investment. Is he not familiar with the concept of return on said investment?
Even the idea of "paying guys not to play/coach" is such an arbitrary thing to oppose. Those are sunk costs, they are just part of running an organization. Why would he be more aggravated with spending the same money on a non-coaching coach vs. on a bad fourth liner if the end result is better that way? Imagine buying a worse car than a better one for a similar price because you disagreed with the value allocated to the hubcaps for, like, WTO purposes.