Prospect Info: - Tom Willander: 11th Overall 2023 Draft (Rogle BK J20) - Part 02 | Page 87 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Prospect Info: Tom Willander: 11th Overall 2023 Draft (Rogle BK J20) - Part 02

Status
Not open for further replies.
If this is actually due to 200k

I’m done with this team under Franky
It is wild the stances this idiot takes on spending for his pride and joy

is on record saying the money should stay on the ice and that why he wont pay coaches
(then proceeds to pay 3 coaches at the same time)

schedule A's are all of sudden some stand they are taking when they have a very small cap, and him reaching them is a good thing.
 
If this is actually due to 200k

I’m done with this team under Franky
its not like we have a glowing front office, with how many holes they are creating with self inflicted gunshots. now being pennywise and pound foolish?

Last year it was having all the requisite stalwarts in 2x 1Cs 1D and 1G. a strong coaching staff and Ian Clarke winning the division. now they have alienated Clarke, about to let Tocchet's team go, traded a 1C and a top pick for a top4D that may actually be blocking a promising prospect....1G is broken, publicly haranguing EP for no reason and not signing their top prospect.
 
I don't understand how Aquilini, an investor, doesn't understand investment. Is he not familiar with the concept of return on said investment?

Even the idea of "paying guys not to play/coach" is such an arbitrary thing to oppose. Those are sunk costs, they are just part of running an organization. Why would he be more aggravated with spending the same money on a non-coaching coach vs. on a bad fourth liner if the end result is better that way? Imagine buying a worse car than a better one for a similar price because you disagreed with the value allocated to the hubcaps for, like, WTO purposes.
 
I don't understand how Aquilini, an investor, doesn't understand investment. Is he not familiar with the concept of return on said investment?

Even the idea of "paying guys not to play/coach" is such an arbitrary thing to oppose. Those are sunk costs, they are just part of running an organization. Why would he be more aggravated with spending the same money on a non-coaching coach vs. on a bad fourth liner if the end result is better that way? Imagine buying a worse car than a better one for a similar price because you disagreed with the value allocated to the hubcaps for, like, WTO purposes.

he's not an investor. he's the chairman of the canucks to keep him away from the actual money making parts of the business. roberto and paolo are the ones running the hospitality and construction businesses
 
I don't understand how Aquilini, an investor, doesn't understand investment. Is he not familiar with the concept of return on said investment?

Even the idea of "paying guys not to play/coach" is such an arbitrary thing to oppose. Those are sunk costs, they are just part of running an organization. Why would he be more aggravated with spending the same money on a non-coaching coach vs. on a bad fourth liner if the end result is better that way? Imagine buying a worse car than a better one for a similar price because you disagreed with the value allocated to the hubcaps for, like, WTO purposes.
The guy has owned this team for decades and hasn’t invested in a practice facility and there’s no signs that he will anytime soon so I don’t think he understands the concept of ROI
 
I don't understand how Aquilini, an investor, doesn't understand investment. Is he not familiar with the concept of return on said investment?

Even the idea of "paying guys not to play/coach" is such an arbitrary thing to oppose. Those are sunk costs, they are just part of running an organization. Why would he be more aggravated with spending the same money on a non-coaching coach vs. on a bad fourth liner if the end result is better that way? Imagine buying a worse car than a better one for a similar price because you disagreed with the value allocated to the hubcaps for, like, WTO purposes.

To answer your first question, Francesco doesn’t actually do anything important in the family businesses and is given the vanity projects. The others do but the Canucks aren’t actually where they focus their attention.
 
This is the f***ing dumbest shit ever. Just get him signed you fat blueberry f***, and build one less apartment in your next building.
I've been as critical of Aquilini as an owner, but does he really have anything to do with the decision of the front office on signing a kid to entry-level contract?

This is really all on Allvin and Rutherford. Clearly, they're digging their heels in on something. Still, it would be extremely disappointing if he isn't signed by training camp in September. And from every report, he'll be attending the annual Canucks Development Camp, which takes place a week after the draft in June.
 
I've been as critical of Aquilini as an owner, but does he really have anything to do with the decision of the front office on signing a kid to entry-level contract?
Same.
This is really all on Allvin and Rutherford. Clearly, they're digging their heels in on something. Still, it would be extremely disappointing if he isn't signed by training camp in September. And from every report, he'll be attending the annual Canucks Development Camp, which takes place a week after the draft in June.
This is what I think as well.

This is caused by some internal cap principle heel duggery.
 
of course its the guy signing these paycheques that has the final say. so wtf is this ownership doing???
 

“College hockey is sick. It’s a lot of fun. You’re all the same age and living with each other, just you and the boys having fun every day of the week. It’s a good league, but you can still feel that it isn’t pro yet.”

That sounds like a player that looks at the NCAA as part of his past, not his future. Does he believe he has outgrown what college hockey can provide moving forward?

“Yeah, I do," Willander said. "A little bit, anyway. I don’t think I’m in any way too good for the league. But thinking about optimizing development, I don’t know if that’s what I need. It might not be the perfect spot for me anymore.”


A quote from the article, makes me think he is going to go the SHL path if he cannot get a NHL deal signed by next season. I still think it is highly unlikely he does not sign his ELC, with the Canucks or somebody else. All the buzz at BU was that they never expected him to come back, even before the SHL stuff started.
 
When was the last time this happened with a top prospect? Umberger? People are quick to blame FA but I really don't think he's in there instructing management to play hardball with their shiny new toy. This feels like another Alvin/Rutherford debacle. These guys have pretty much burnt all of the good will they earned after last year's season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy Dufresne
It’s so bizarre and I still can’t believe they’re messing around with their top prospect over bonuses. We are screwed for as long as ownership is here.
At least the "ooh this is evil Van media making something out of nothing" crowd can just stop now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flik
I find it very upsetting. On the surface it seems very surface. Digging deeper it looks even dumber.

The best I can make of it is that two sides have drawn a line in the sand.
Willander is selfish and putting himself before the team. It's probably best to trade him right now for a crappy return before he becomes a negative asset.








Is that what you want me to think JR/Allvin??? HUH?????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad