thewave
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2011
- 43,009
- 13,444
They tried OEL, they tried 5 forwards, it's those 11 mil guys, they are just too casual and stationary.
So don't sign JT and Marner?
They tried OEL, they tried 5 forwards, it's those 11 mil guys, they are just too casual and stationary.
Without Matthews they don’t have enough offense to separate them from other teams.
Especially the bad ones .
It’s a dogfight every game.
I have been calling out Marner since the Montreal series. But I usually don't comment on that during regular seasons.So don't sign JT and Marner?
What's our record sans Matthews?That means the team is a paper tiger going nowhere. FML
It's a problem overall, but they will play a few decent shifts in this game and that will be enough to win, but that isn't necessarily a good thing.We're out played and out shot nearly every game now.
I'd rather blow it up and start again if that is the case. Your winning nothing building around 16 and 88. Both are softer than the Pillsbury dough boy. One can't score and the other shows up when he feels like it.With Matthews’ future effectiveness in doubt, Marner has them by the you know whats.
13 x 8 coming up?
Winning percentage is about .571 with him and .521 without him.What's our record sans Matthews?
Canada down 3-1 at the end of the first. Just terrible.
Having one is fine if we want 2 one of them better be at a discount. 2 rightwingers pulling down 25 million between them is insanityI'd rather blow it up and start again if that is the case. Your winning nothing building around 16 and 88.
Giving up a goal with 2 seconds to go in a period is isually the kiss of death.Canada down 3-1 at the end of the first. Just terrible.
CorrectSo don't sign JT and Marner?
Getting what they deserve, really. Just didn’t have it this year.Giving up a goal with 2 seconds to go in a period is isually the kiss of death.
Dude, come onCanada down 3-1 at the end of the first. Just terrible.
glad I've ignored the Jrs for 2 years now. Looks like I'm not missing muchCanada down 3-1 at the end of the first. Just terrible.
Please for the love of God NOWith Matthews’ future effectiveness in doubt, Marner has them by the you know whats.
13 x 8 coming up?
What does he provide on the PP? Doesn't shoot, makes slow passes and stands around mostly. I don't get his contribution on the point, anyone can move it side to side.I'd like to see the pp going 5 forwards again, Rielly is a black hole, get Marner's cranium into the game.