MoontoScott
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2012
- 7,859
- 8,581
Sometimes the best explanation is the simplest explanation.Skinner should have been an NHL back-up goalie through the winning window. It's frankly a miracle he didn't melt down when the big money guy flamed out when all the obvious red flags came home to roost. His playing style isn't a good fit for an attacking team that tends to tilt the ice but is also prone to big gaffs when their team structure breaks down. They need an athletic, veteran goaltender who can bail out when required..
Skinner's lack of athleticism is an inherent weakness that was going to place a ceiling on his abilities. Unfortunately that's compounded by poor hockey sense which shows in slow decision making and puck tracking. That's either an inexperience, development component that will improve or a fatal flaw. His technique breakdown follows when his team structure breaks down in front of him and in situations where his poor athleticism and reads require quick reactions like lateral movements. Now if he's a back-up through this precious window phase, as was the plan, there's cover to enable realistic development to see if they have an average starting goaltender after three years. Defaulting him into a starting goalie with no established tandem 1A/1B is poor management.
Off to the next saviour with people talking about Rodrigue saving the day. This organization should have at minimum grabbed a reliable short-term tandem guy like Cam Talbot at the deadline. Use your assets to buy retention for coverage in the game's most important position.
He just doesn't have the athletic abilities that many other NHL goalies do. Witness his attempts to slide from post to post. It tells a story.