Leon Lucius Black
Registered User
- Nov 5, 2007
- 16,023
- 6,196
Value of: Thomas Greiss to Toronto
- Thread starter LEAFANFORLIFE23
- Start date
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Best bet just sign Jonas Enroth to a 1 year deal then you don't have to worry about losing him in the expansion draft then you just protect Andersen.
That's bad for the Leafs. If they're trading JVR it'll be for something they can use going forward... Griess would be the backup and while Kulemin was a well liked Maple Leaf, he's not very attractive making north of 4m.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Is this for real? I wouldn't trade JVR for both...let alone add Sosh. We had Kulemin...he bolted for more money from the Isles....he can stay with the Isles.
SI90
Registered User
Isles are trying to move Halak be use of how fantastic Griess was for us. If it were up to me I'd keep both but of the 2 I'd say Greiss isn't likely moving.
SI90
Registered User
Only problem is Islanders want to dump Halak not Greiss so that's an issue to start. JFB the Islanders 3rd Goaile has a better chance of being packaged and has 675K cheap backup. Islanders don't want to trade JFB but who wants Halak? Halak with a 4.5 mill cap hit 4.750 this year and 5 mill next year...so who wants Him? Islanders are stuck with him!
JFB , Bailey, Mayfield to Leafs For????????
JFB , Bailey, Mayfield to Leafs For????????
Oh my bad, I have Greiss with a higher value to certain teams so I didn't even come close to read it that way.
No way Greiss costs a 1st & 2nd, not yet anyway, he will have to maintain this level for another season or two or at least get extended for that to be possible.
The Niemi thing I like IF we pick up a massive piece or two as compensation for taking on a ridiculous contract.
Michalek, Holland
For
Niemi, Honka, conditional 2017 pick*
*should Niemi be claimed in expansion we get a 4th, otherwise we get a 2nd.
Won't happen as the cost is WAY too high for Dallas to pay especially considering the reason to do this is to acquire a starter like Bishop or Fleury which will cost assets but honestly I'd rather Enroth for one year at $2M then Niemi for TWO MORE YEARS.
Because we need a backup, it cannot he Sparks and Enroth aside there isnt much in UFA
Hally BlackWood
Registered User
then get Kinkaid from the devils for next to nothing. Wedgewood will be the back up in nj this year. So he will have to clear waivers.
Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
i just threw up in my mouth a little. we keep our top line winger and top prospect. backup goalie and cap dump are of no interest
Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
ding ding ding!
Enroth or Ramos.
or grab one of the goalies montreal, winnipeg, or florida tries to push through waivers.
no need to waste assets on a short term backup unless we are dumping laich, michalek, greening etc
cupcrazyman
Stupid Sexy Flanders
how many goalies from nhl rosters is Las Vegas allowed to pluck from the unprotected list ?
As well as UFA goalies ?
Leafs backup should be a short term 1 year deal.
As well as UFA goalies ?
Leafs backup should be a short term 1 year deal.
periferal
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2007
- 29,249
- 16,631
periferal
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2007
- 29,249
- 16,631
SeaOfBlue
The Passion That Unites Us All
- Aug 1, 2013
- 35,591
- 16,776
Why would we be adding? I wouldn't even begin to consider trading Holland one-for-one for Berube. Plus I don't think New York needs more NHL forwards.
I also doubt we'd have a lot of interest in Berube. I don't really see how he's a clear upgrade over the three young goalies we have in our organization, and he's 2 or 3 years older than them. That being said, I also don't see us going after Halak, nor NYI trading Greiss. So there's nothing really there unless there is more than just Berube involved.
The Examiner
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 6,525
- 1,940
As someone probably pointed out for you already, he's on an expiring contract and will be an UFA.
Losing him in the expansion draft?
Impossible.
And even if it was possible, such goalies are dime a dozen...
He would simply be a stop gap measure to determine if Bibeau could be a back up the season after.
Greiss proved himself in the playoffs and really with a healthy Halak a platoon system could work in Broklyn. I cant see Greiss leaving unless the offer was way above whathes worth and at the end of the DAT Garret Sparks and to a lesser extent Antoine Bibeau have proven the an play at that level. Sparks seems like a logical choice as the number two but with Anderson's age there are some options out there. Kinrad from Jersey has been thrown out there as the Devils have Schnieder and now Wedgewodd there.
HoweHullOrr
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 11,871
- 2,375
LeapOnOver
Mackenzie is a hack!
Goalies traditionally carry minimal value. I don't think the Islanders would get enough for him to warrant a trade. He's probably more value to the team than the return he'd get.
SLAPSHOT723
QU! Bobcats!
There are three goalies on the roster. One will be gone, but there's no way Greiss isn't on the Islanders next year.
Sparks will not be the backup he can't be he's not ready that was proven last year
