Player Discussion Thomas Chabot (D) Part 2

LiseL

Registered User
Sponsor
Sep 25, 2023
1,104
1,157
Even last night, with Chabot on they were +16 for shot attempts. Nobody on the team was close. The other D pairings were in the -10 range. We provide offense and play in the other teams zone when he’s on, when he’s off we get absolutely caved at even strength.

Him on and off the ice has been such a contrast, they legitimately provide zero offensive capabilities with him off the ice at even strength.

With him on the ice and without him on the ice is complete opposites with regards to how the play is going.

I’m all for sending him, and every single guy on the the roster not named Sanderson or Stutzle packing. This core is broken, and poorly built.
Personally, I think that is as much about Jensen as it is about Chabot. So many times, it was an outlet pass from Jensen that resulted in a goal. We need to find another Jensen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yak and Alex1234

Alex1234

Registered User
Oct 14, 2014
16,852
6,990
The crazy thing is that we all know he wouldn't have those numbers if we had brought him back.

So what exactly is the problem with this group where any kind of talent and ability is totally stunted?

Why does this keep happening?
Also Goalies lol

This morning
TOP 10 GAA Gustafsson, Korpi, Daccord
TOP 10 Save% Gustafsson, Talbot, Daccord
 

HSF

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
26,641
8,050
hes been awesome

always knew he would be good once they actually gave him players to play with

best defensemen on our team this year
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad