About time he left. knew he would fail from day 1. Bergevin and the french media put on a pedestal like he was a savior only for him to fail miserably.
I never liked the hockey player so I won’t thank him for his play.Indeed I've already said more than enough about JD over the years.
Thank You and Goodbye seems adequate at this point.
That was the problem all along a 4th or 5th wheel being handed the keys to glory in our market. Never stood a chance.You can check my post history.
I literally made 89 posts all of 2023(this is my 90th). 50 of those posts are from the last 3 days. If I responded to you at some point its a coincidence. I actually don't care who the poster is when I reply.
So I didn't get the passive aggressiveness especially since I agree with you. I just responded by saying many had extremely lofty expectations for Sergachev which were unfair to him(the norris trophy isn't an easy trophy to win) and that he is a quality d-man. Other than that, Drouin seems like a good kid but not a good hockey player. I think we agree there too. Cheers.
No he's a good hockey player and has actualThe Avs fans are already putting him on the first line with Nathan. They're watching videos of Drouin's time with the Lightning like that's what they're going to get out of Drouin. I know it's a low risk signing but my god, the amount of hopium is insane.
The only line they'll share is the one at the cafeteria after practice.
No wonder he failedMichel Bergeron, the day after the trade:
"Le plus spectaculaire depuis Guy Lafleur"
"On a beau analyser de toutes les manières possibles cette transaction, on ne peut en venir qu’à une seule conclusion: Marc Bergevin a réalisé un véritable coup d’éclat."
"Le Canadien a mis la main sur une super vedette, un joueur explosif et électrisant."
"Sa principale qualité: sa vitesse en possession de rondelle. À ce niveau, Connor McDavid vient au premier rang dans la LNH à mes yeux et j’en surprendrai peut-être plusieurs avec ma prochaine affirmation, mais Jonathan Drouin n’est pas loin derrière."
"Et, tant qu’à être dans les comparaisons, je pense que sur le strict plan du spectacle qu’il offrira sur la patinoire, Drouin apportera ce que Guy Lafleur a offert aux amateurs de Montréal pendant des années."
"Everyone has their opinion on the deal. Some see it as a theft from Marc Bergevin while others fear the Canadiens have made a deal similar to the one that sent youngster Ryan McDonagh to Rangers for Scott Gomez.
I tell you right now, forget it. There is absolutely no comparison possible."
Phew, Bergy was already senile back then, can't imagine what he's up to now.
This was almost as worst, in the failed predictions department, as when Norman Flynn made a scanning review of the Habs 07 draft.
Put serg on Montreal and he's a -40 with 30 points. Must be nice having multiple all stars and future HOF players and coaches. Chris wideman would look like a decent third pairing on Tampa lol seriously it’s just common sense. Being a product of your environment isn’t always a bad thing.Only return that is recurring is an inexhaustible array of posts cutting down Sergachev's value from “his performance is boosted by being on a stacked team” to “he's only a low level 2nd pairing D” and the all time greatest hit on this forum “he would have been way worse had he stayed with Montreal.”
Same thing is happening whenever any other player is traded or not drafted by the Habs.
It's happening right now with Michkov. I wonder if there are Habs burner accounts working overtime on this forum to extol the virtues of the Popcorn Prince.
I’d say we kind of did based on how difficult it was for the Habs to move him in the past few years. It’s just a confirmation of where the market had been at and where it continues to be.It was a long and painful saga. I don't think even the biggest sceptics expected he's gonna play for near league minimum at this point of his career.
No, I mean the moment we traded for him. There was a large contingent questioning his character, or denying he's ever going to be an impact forward, but I don't think anybody thought he's not a top 6 NHL forward and that he's going to land in Galchenyuk-category.I’d say we kind of did based on how difficult it was for the Habs to move him in the past few years. It’s just a confirmation of where the market had been at and where it continues to be.
Oh, misread your post then.No, I mean the moment we traded for him. There was a large contingent questioning his character, or denying he's ever going to be an impact forward, but I don't think anybody thought he's not a top 6 NHL forward and that he's going to land in Galchenyuk-category.
I think he thought he got his hands on a first line talent. Perhaps a supporting one in worse case scenario, but first line nonetheless.Oh, misread your post then.
You’re right there were red flags. I thought there was no need to hand him a 6-year deal from the start. Don’t know what Bergevin was thinking.
The Avs fans are already putting him on the first line with Nathan. They're watching videos of Drouin's time with the Lightning like that's what they're going to get out of Drouin. I know it's a low risk signing but my god, the amount of hopium is insane.
The only line they'll share is the one at the cafeteria after practice.
The only line they'll share is the one at the cafeteria after practice.
Drouin's value has never been high during the two years that Hughes has been GM. How exactly did he get fleeced by Sakic?I make it sound how the Habs got played by the Avs. That's it. How they didn't unload Drouin when his value was still high.
This kid had disaster written all over him, long before he was traded to Montreal.
Too bad Bergevin was blind as a bat when he gave away Sergachev for him.
It's actually a sad day for me. When it comes to Drouin, I originally had high expectations that he would become a vital player for our Habs. I was one of a small fraction on our board who was actually happy with the trade. Yes giving up Sergachev was painful. Though the idea of adding a young, skilled forward, was exciting. The background of a player really means nothing to me. But I will admit that Drouin being a French Canadian was a wonderful bonus.
I've met Drouin several times over the years. I've read many posts where posters claim that "Drouin didn't care about hockey". Or that he was a selfish primeadonna. Neither statement could be further from the truth. He's a kid that was obsessed with hockey. He was also well liked by his teammates.
As the injuries started to pile up. Whenever I'd see him, he wasn't the same. He didn't have that little twinkle in his eyes. He never came across as a very talkative person. Though each time we met, he seemed to be more and more withdrawn.
The last time I saw Drouin, about a month before he took his leave. He was very withdrawn. Not really responding when some of this teammates, or others around him would try to include him in conversations. It was painful to watch, kind of like watching an injured animal act, around strangers. So it honestly didn't surprise me when he decided to step away.
Injuries have obviously taken away the potential he showed in juniors and with Tampa. I'm hoping that he can take care of his mental health. As I still believe he can be a solid player. Leaving Montreal is the best thing that could happen to him. I wish him the best of luck.
No risk at all at 800k.
I'm referring to the Lekh and Newhook trades.Drouin's value has never been high during the two years that Hughes has been GM. How exactly did he get fleeced by Sakic?
Hughes was forced to trade Lehkonen because the Habs didn't have the cap space to re-sign him with the mess that Bergevin left behind, and he received decent value for what Leks was. Newhook for two picks that more likely than not do not become NHL regulars wasn't a fleecing.I'm referring to the Lekh and Newhook trades.