monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
The worst draft ever? | Page 3 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

The worst draft ever?

Maybe only interesting to select few, but the draft eligibility rule changes over the years has altered the draft pools.

1736536011082.png


mid-80s through 1992?: This was slightly before my time, but there used to be a rule in place where you could only select a first time draft eligible European in the first three rounds unless he played a certain number of games with his senior club.

By age, Nicklas Lidstrom could have been eligible for the 1988 Draft (assuming if he opted in) but would get drafted in 1989. Other guys like Alexander Mogilny and Sergei Fedorov would get taken in their 2nd draft years.

The most infamous loophole with this rule was Pavel Bure. In THN's 1989 Draft Preview, Bob McKenzie notes that Bure was only eligible in the first three rounds. But Vancouver (and apparently a couple other clubs) had obtained Soviet box scores to show that Bure had met the games played threshold to be eligible after the third round. Most teams were under the impression that Bure wasn't eligible, so a bunch of teams rushed to Central Registry to protest the pick when Vancouver took him in the 6th round. Comically one of the teams who objected was intending to take Bure with their next pick.

? through 2003: NCAA bound players had to wait an extra year to opt in to the draft to preserve their "amateur" status. So you'd get cases like Dany Heatley being a full year older than Marian Gaborik. And then there was the rare instance where Rick DiPietro gave up his eligibility in order to enter the 2000 Draft instead of waiting until 2001.

2005-present day: Before 2005, a European player had to be drafted into the league (unless he played in a North American junior league). So you'd see a handful of guys in their mid-late 20s get taken. So guys like Daniel Alfredsson, Pekka Rinne, Lubomir Visnovsky would have been undrafted free agents by today's rules.

Now Europeans are only draft eligible through age 21.
 
Maybe only interesting to select few, but the draft eligibility rule changes over the years has altered the draft pools.

View attachment 959125

mid-80s through 1992?: This was slightly before my time, but there used to be a rule in place where you could only select a first time draft eligible European in the first three rounds unless he played a certain number of games with his senior club.

By age, Nicklas Lidstrom could have been eligible for the 1988 Draft (assuming if he opted in) but would get drafted in 1989. Other guys like Alexander Mogilny and Sergei Fedorov would get taken in their 2nd draft years.

The most infamous loophole with this rule was Pavel Bure. In THN's 1989 Draft Preview, Bob McKenzie notes that Bure was only eligible in the first three rounds. But Vancouver (and apparently a couple other clubs) had obtained Soviet box scores to show that Bure had met the games played threshold to be eligible after the third round. Most teams were under the impression that Bure wasn't eligible, so a bunch of teams rushed to Central Registry to protest the pick when Vancouver took him in the 6th round. Comically one of the teams who objected was intending to take Bure with their next pick.

? through 2003: NCAA bound players had to wait an extra year to opt in to the draft to preserve their "amateur" status. So you'd get cases like Dany Heatley being a full year older than Marian Gaborik. And then there was the rare instance where Rick DiPietro gave up his eligibility in order to enter the 2000 Draft instead of waiting until 2001.

2005-present day: Before 2005, a European player had to be drafted into the league (unless he played in a North American junior league). So you'd see a handful of guys in their mid-late 20s get taken. So guys like Daniel Alfredsson, Pekka Rinne, Lubomir Visnovsky would have been undrafted free agents by today's rules.

Now Europeans are only draft eligible through age 21.
The ncaa rule change went a long way towards a lot more players opting to play college hockey.
 
Drafts like that will produce a hall of famer out of nowhere. Some 7th round pick will end up being incredible. Hellebuyck came out of the 2012 draft. It just takes some time to get there.
 
Surprised no one has brought up 2018 yet...really bad first round.


I came here to point this out.
A few good D in Dahlin, Hughes, Bouchard, Dobson. 3 good forwards. Not much else besides bottom of the lineup guys beyond that.
 
I think going in everyone knew it would be a weaker draft. I do think Montreal will do really well out of this one though. Slaf, Hutson, Beck, Engstrom... Not too shabby.

I also really like Jared Davidson who we got in the 5th Round. He's kicking butt in the AHL and I really think he's got a future in the bottom 6 in the NHL.
 
I know it is still early but, the 2022 draft is looking mediocre at best. There has been no "superstar" to take the league by storm and the 2 most promising players seem to be Cooley and Hutson. The 1999 draft was dreadful minus the Sedins. What do you think was the worst draft class? Is there hope (i know it's early) for 2022 to be decent.

Cheers

You want to declare a draft the worst ever two years after the draft?

That's hilarious!
 
You are going to make a bunch of MTL fans mad.

Honestly need more time to properly assess 2022.

Why would Montreal fans be mad? Montreal fans are quite happy with the 2022 draft.

The Canadiens have already had three players from the 2022 draft suit up, two of them Slafkovksy and Hutson are already key contributors to the team, and three others, Owen Beck, Adam Engstrom and Filip Mesar are valued pieces of the rebuild.
 
Why would Montreal fans be mad? Montreal fans are quite happy with the 2022 draft.

The Canadiens have already had three players from the 2022 draft suit up, two of them Slafkovksy and Hutson are already key contributors to the team, and three others, Owen Beck, Adam Engstrom and Filip Mesar are valued pieces of the rebuild.

I keep repeating this but you guys shouldn't sleep on Davidson.

Bruin fans said sane thing about McAvoy
Sens about Chabot.

Yeah but those fandoms suck. BOS fans are a bunch of mouth breathers and ever been to OTT's barn? It's as quiet as a library and what do you find in a library? librarians. Who the F listens to hockey takes from a bunch of librarians? Case closed!

/s
 
I keep repeating this but you guys shouldn't sleep on Davidson.
I don't think anyone is sleeping on him, but I think, because he's two years older than the rest of the draft class, the expectations with him are a little different than the rest of the group.
 
I don't think anyone is sleeping on him, but I think, because he's two years older than the rest of the draft class, the expectations with him are a little different than the rest of the group.

I hears ya but I like it when we really start turning over stones for the overlooked guys in the later picks. In addition as an improving team we really need to spend some of that lucre to hit some singles and doubles with those 5th to 7th rounders. Jared Davidson was an undrafted guy who only started shining as a 19-20yr old.

I'd love it if the Habs started a part-time Scout program to make sure we have eyes and ears in EVERY junior arena.
 
I feel like the 99 draft needs to have it reaffirmed that:

After the Sedins and Zetterberg the next highest scorer is almost 340 points back (Radim Vrbata at 623 career points in 4th with Zetterberg's 960 in 3rd)

Only 4 players made it to 1,000 career GP and nobody else even made it to 800

Your top 10 scorers list for that class includes Mike Comrie, Tim Connolly, Ryan Malone, and Nik Hagman.

99 has 3 hall of famers and then it falls off a goddamn cliff.

The only other thing that might save 99 is that it at least produced two quality goalies in Ryan Miller and Craig Anderson to go with its 3 HOF level guys. If there's something else that could doom 96 it's that the top goalies from that class are also basically the only goalies from that class: Mathieu Garon and Robert Esche. Seriously, it's them, Stephen Valiquette, and that's it. 99 also had the good grace to give us Alex Auld, Mathieu Caron, and Michael Leighton.
 

Ad

Ad

Top
-->->