syz
[1, 5, 6, 14]
- Jul 13, 2007
- 30,367
- 15,839
People who thought the Oilers were tanking in that era continue to severely underestimate how bad Steve Tambellini was as an NHL GM. He was legitimately trying to win every year.
Ken Holland swears he only need 2 generational producers OR the 2 best two-way centers in the world and a top 3 defenseman of all time and THEN he's your guy for sure!this strategy only works if you have an elite, all time great hof GM like Ken Holland to build the perfect team around your top end talent
What a weak take…. now do the Penguins, Blackhawks, Avalanche, etc.Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:
Florida Panthers:
2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall
4 Top Three picks in a five-year span
Edmonton Oilers:
2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall
5 Top Three picks in a six-year span
The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.
Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.
Nah, there was a whole docuseries thing called "Oil Change" about the 2009-10 season that was clear they were tanking hardcore after doing the "chasing the dream" thing in 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 prior to that.People who thought the Oilers were tanking in that era continue to severely underestimate how bad Steve Tambellini was as an NHL GM. He was legitimately trying to win every year.
The answer to all 3 of those are center-defense, their centers don't defend well or control play. Buffalo's first iteration has potential to control the middle of the ice but they imploded before their players could develop.For every Colorado you have a Columbus, Arizona, or Buffalo. I don't think it's a reliable way to build a team, but the argument can be made that if you're a team that is stuck at the lower end of the league that it probably increases your chances a bit.
Florida isn't necessarily winning because of their own draft picks though - they're winning because of Calgary's... At least that's what put them over the top.
"what a weak take, in fact I am going to agree with your entire post just to show how much I disagree"What a weak take…. now do the Penguins, Blackhawks, Avalanche, etc.
How else does a small market, Western Canadian remote team possibly build a team to get to the Stanley Cup finals against so many other factors that factor into today’s NHL culture? Even that being said, the pure fluke of the talent available in the exact drafts that you end up landing the top picks is just that… pure good or bad fortune.
It a minor miracle that the Oilers have made these Stanley Cup Finals.
Center, Defense, Wing, Goaltender. In fact, you could just say "a winning team"The answer to all 3 of those are center-defense, their centers don't defend well or control play. Buffalo's first iteration has potential to control the middle of the ice but they imploded before their players could develop.
Hate your timing… it seems like an attempt to downplay the accomplishments of the Oilers and bring down their fan base."what a weak take, in fact I am going to agree with your entire post just to show how much I disagree"
No specifically the ability of their centers to defend or at least possess the puck, that's why most rebuilds fail."what a weak take, in fact I am going to agree with your entire post just to show how much I disagree"
Center, Defense, Wing, Goaltender. In fact, you could just say "a winning team"
I pick the night the Stanley Cup final matchup is decided to... discuss the Stanley Cup finalists from a 300 foot level? That's not.. weird.Hate your timing… it seems like an attempt to downplay the accomplishments of the Oilers and bring down their fan base.
You pick the night the Oilers clinch a SCF berth to post this? Seem fishy.
That is INSANE.Edmonton Oilers:
2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall
No, most rebuilds "fail" because 1 team wins the Cup and 31 teams lose so statistically, it's much more destined to "fail" because it has to be that case by nature.No specifically the ability of their centers to defend or at least possess the puck, that's why most rebuilds fail.
Agreed, it's not my point that tanking alone is sufficient, but it's often... if not necessary it's pretty close to it... to get the thing kicked off and let good management take over from there.I mean…florida made a huge move to grab tkachuk
Picked Forsling off of waivers
Traded for Bennett, Montour, Reinhart
Signed Bobrovsky and verhaeghe
Sure they drafted ekblad, Barkov, lundell, and a couple others but to say tanking is what got here is discrediting everything else they’ve done
Teams like Buffalo, Ottawa, Toronto to an extent although not as bad as those two also tanked…and look where they are
Ditto for Edmonton, but I guess you have more of a case there, but still Hyman, ekholm have changed the teams identity and complexion just as much as rnh and Bouchard have.
To be successful you have to make good picks, develop those prospects, make good signings and shrewd trades.
Holland has more rings in the last 30 years than the entire country of Canada.this strategy only works if you have an elite, all time great hof GM like Ken Holland to build the perfect team around your top end talent
Saying they got there tanking is not downplaying the Oilers. It's a statement that it's the best way to build a winner and using them as an example. Which you also provided 3 more examples of.Hate your timing… it seems like an attempt to downplay the accomplishments of the Oilers and bring down their fan base.
You pick the night the Oilers clinch a SCF berth to post this? Seem fishy.
lol, no, I'll be stoked for McDavidThese are the threads of a person who is going to cry if the oilers win
Well every city can't be as desirable as Boston or Dallas. Bruins signed Chara after a dogshit season. That's not happening in Edmonton.Hard not to respect teams like Dallas that more or less build through good drafting and management. Obviously there are other teams who have done the same (Boston).
Who sez tanking doesn't work? For the most part it works, except for a few teams that royally screw things up, like Buffalo. The Oilers are close to Buffalo though, given all those #1 overall, and still sucking for a long time. At least they got some pay-off with a SCF appearance, and maybe a Stanley Cup. How does Buffalo do it? You have to almost purposely be that bad.Contemporary Top 3 Picks for Each Team in the Finals:
Florida Panthers:
2010 - 3rd overall
2011 - 3rd overall
2013 - 2nd overall
2014 - 1st overall
4 Top Three picks in a five-year span
Edmonton Oilers:
2010 - 1st overall
2011 - 1st overall
2012 - 1st overall
2014 - 3rd overall
2015 - 1st overall
5 Top Three picks in a six-year span
The whole "tanking doesn't work!" argument always focuses on the unsuccessful rebuilds, but once again we see the familiar pattern in the Salary Cap era that this is the most reliable way to build a team with Stanley Cup aspirations.
Long-story short: if your team is no good, tank and tank hard, and don't be afraid to just keep on tanking if you don't have immediate results until you eventually do.