HalfPastDan
Registered Schmoozer
- Feb 7, 2010
- 785
- 16
Is it just me or did the Canucks sign just as many AHL vet types as any other team in the off-season? It seems to me that the issue is other teams have a far better pool of drafted/signed prospects on their AHL team that gives the team its depth. You can argue about the quality of the AHL guys the Canucks signed, sure, but I feel, as usual, Canucks drafting is a problem. It's not just about quality either. It's also about quantity. If you have a lot of picks, maybe you don't get a ton of NHL'ers but you likely get your Grenier types to help fill.out the AHL roster.
I don't understand why anyone's all that surprised that our AHL team is struggling. The biggest weakness of this new regime has been pro-level scouting. And their amateur scouting isn't good enough, or they haven't had enough longevity yet to make up the difference. When you're spending assets on fringe level NHL'ers like Vey, Prust, even Granlund, Gudbransen, Sbisa, while NHL'ers - haven't been all that astute acquisitions.
Why would the formula change at all for the AHL team. It's still pro-scouting just with a lesser budget. I for one am not surprised that the Comets have gone to **** - why would you be? Management is inept at the most important facet of managing a farm team - pro scouting.
Who knows - maybe more of Jimbo's picks pan out and Utica starts getting a stream of decent AHL players for a season or two, but that pipeline hasn't been established yet, and until that happens (knock on wood), it sucks, but the Comets will suck. Because this group couldn't spot a decent AHL'er in a pick up game.