i got a bad feeling about the carolina coasts
Well, Kentucky, Mississippi, Louisiana, West Virginia, and Arizona (albeit not "traditionally Southern") are all quite low in that ranking. Michigan, as well. (edit: I put Ohio. That was false.)
I didn't learn anything new about New Jersey or California.
Since you included Arizona as a "non-traditional southern state" why did you not include New Mexico, ranked 41st, as a "non-traditional southern state"? Or does that not go with your narrative that states with tendencies to vote Republican are not fiscally healthy?
Corruption is never exclusive to a region or group...Acceptance on the other hand is a completely different story.Well, Kentucky, Mississippi, Louisiana, West Virginia, and Arizona (albeit not "traditionally Southern") are all quite low in that ranking. Michigan, as well. (edit: I put Ohio. That was false.)
I didn't learn anything new about New Jersey or California.
I question the conclusiveness here, considering we've possessed Puerto Rico since 1898. It's really hard to say just how much of the corruption is influenced by internalized norms vs. externalities. I find it hard to believe that there is a sociopolitical landscape installed in Puerto Rico that makes it any more or less susceptible to government corruption just by virtue of the surrounding region. (e.g. New Jersey and New York in the mid 20th century)
Fraud, waste, and abuse exist throughout this entire country. I'm not of the view that our federal government installed in Washington can claim a high ground in regards to corruption.
Corruption is never exclusive to a region or group...Acceptance on the other hand is a completely different story.
Um, well, I was building upon a specific point I made, where I referenced "states that tend to vote Republican."
I literally acknowledged New Jersey and California.
You should probably read my entire post before insinuating I'm being a partisan hack.
i got a bad feeling about the carolina coasts
I'm just pointing out it was convenient NM was left out is all
That state fiscal ranking study isn't all that surprising though. It is no surprise the Northeast, Appalachia, Illinois, Michigan, and California are all in bad fiscal positions.
To pivot the discussion, Michigan totally makes sense.
Whenever I visit family friends out in Battle Creek, I'm always left with "holy **** how can they POSSIBLY have worse roads than Jersey?" It's almost impressive. (I don't have statistics here, this is anecdotal.)
Granted, they have brutal winters, but so can/do we.
EDIT: Glad stats back up my anecdote, somewhat. We rank above Michigan in bridge quality, which, while you're more likely to wreck a wheel on a pothole in Jersey, at least our bridges are deemed less likely to suddenly fail. But really nitpicking which states have better roads is kinda pointless, the whole country is kinda ****ed.
MAPPED: The sorry state of America's roads
I was genuinely surprised at the quality of their roads though, Idaho, Utah and Wyoming too. I figured with the rough winters they get that the roads would be bad, but I did not see a single pot hole in any of those states.
(moving this to the thread about nothing)always found it amazing that majority of these jobs go to sexy men and women. like being attractive is a requirement. maybe it was 20/30 years ago but now? not so much needed imo
HAHAHA sharknado sequel: sharkicaneI cant believe there are people on TWTR who believe this.
I was genuinely surprised at the quality of their roads though, Idaho, Utah and Wyoming too. I figured with the rough winters they get that the roads would be bad, but I did not see a single pot hole in any of those states.
We dont do that in New Jersey. We build a road today that we know will be obsolete in a few years so the construction & contracting fiefdom gets more $ in a few years (SEE: Corruption discussion in this thread a handful of posts above).
Relatively speaking...Most of the West is "New" compared to the east...We have Water Mains older than they have been States.Everywhere I've been in Utah the roads are fantastic.
What's more, they've planned them with an eye to the future and with growth in mind. There are places where there are 4 or even 5 lanes that clearly only need 3 (or probably 2 in some places), but they're built with the knowledge that the population will eventually increase.
We dont do that in New Jersey. We build a road today that we know will be obsolete in a few years so the construction & contracting fiefdom gets more $ in a few years (SEE: Corruption discussion in this thread a handful of posts above).
Since we were talking about it, I saw this today and it’s sad. FEMA saying they don’t know why it’s there but they should not have put it there if they did and PR saying FEMA put it there but can’t say how they know that.