Murray is clearly missed against the Bruins, and there shouldn't be any more questions why Nash and Dubinsky are in the lineup.
I wont harp on Werenski's known defensive issues, but what I will bring up is that in game 1, he actually played more overall time than Jones. I'll quickly hop on the, "Torts sucks" bandwagon, and make it known that this should never happen. Not only is he getting regular PK time (Kukan arguably is better here imo) but he's also getting "significant" more time than Jones on the PP, or at least is clearly used as the "go to guy".
Other than being a smoother stickhandler and his quicker release on his wrist/snap shot, Werenski isn't better than Jones offensively or on the PP in ANY way. The accuracy of Jones wrist shot, and his (imo) much better slap shot (imo) 'trumps' the things Werenski does better. Jones' passing and "offensive awareness" is also (imo) quite a bit better and he seems to have some moments with Panarin, where their skill and chemistry just "clicks". There's no reason that Werenski should be playing on the #1PP if he and Jones are going to have nearly the same TOI numbers or god forbid Werenski actually plays more.
With all that said, Clendening played just over 9 min in game 1. Its safe to say that Torts does not trust him in "tough" or penalty kill situations, and that he couldn't really play anybody less than that, unless Gabe Carlsson was the only guy available. Looking at this, and the fact that we have Zack f***ing Werenski playing 25-nearly 30 minutes, and a "big" chunk spent on the PK, I think we (should) see Gavrikov get in tonight and end up making an impact quite quickly.
Also, Tampa is not Boston. Or should I say, Boston is not Tampa. Its really NOT just him, but also that the lineup I believe needs a tweak. Texier (Alexier?) should prolly come out. Again, its not just him, but we do have plenty of scoring potential throughout the lineup, and even though he is "fine" along the boards and in the defensive zone, he is not going to be able to play consistent hard minutes on a Jenner/Dubinsky or Nash/Dubinsky "defensive" 4th line.
Panarin-Dubois-Atkinson
Foligno-Duchene-Bjorkstrand
Dzingel-Jenner-Anderson
Nash-Dubinsky-Sedlak
If you ask me, Sedlak is underrated both offensively and defensively. He is not flashy but I see remarkable similarities between him and 1 of my other longtime favs Anisimov. They are EFFECTIVE. Not to mention, Sedlak especially, plays a gritty game that works well with both the guys on the 4th line and against the Bruins. He is arguably better, or at least, harder to keep away from the net than anybody other than Jenner and MAYBE Anderson/Dubois. N-O to Hannikainen, please and thank you.