WeThreeKings
Demidov is a HAB
I don't give a damn about "the mix" BS, All I want is progress from the players and coaches
They will spike.. and they will fall.. and they will spike again.
Progression is very rarely a straight line upward.
I don't give a damn about "the mix" BS, All I want is progress from the players and coaches
We still have far more holes than the Knights had year one never mind when they started making their aggressive moves.
I also don't think we have a great mix in the players we don't think of as holes we are even showing cracks we didn't think existed.
Wyatt Johnson is a good exemple.They will spike.. and they will fall.. and they will spike again.
Progression is very rarely a straight line upward.
Regression of this magnitude concerns me though.
From 5th worst to 2nd worst is pretty terrible considering they added players to help the team and other teams are going through more deliberate tanksFrom ,450 to ,357 is not that great of a drawback, considering how young they are and how useless a lot of vets are and how little talent there really is on the team.
Yeah, they’ve looked bad for fifteen games.If amassing assets was the goal, you should be acknowledge they squandered them on Dach, Newhook, and didn’t sell high on Matheson.
l
And let's be honest. Most of that regression is Monahan, Savard and the goalies. Yes the team at the end of last season was playing better (with no pressure to win) but at the beginning of last season if you remove Monahan imo it would have looked like this year.From ,450 to ,357 is not that great of a drawback, considering how young they are and how useless a lot of vets are and how little talent there really is on the team.
They added Laine and he is not playing ... all the other adds are rookies.From 5th worst to 2nd worst is pretty terrible considering they added players to help the team and other teams are going through more deliberate tanks
Yeah, but I’d want that RD to have some mobility. As I said a Hamrlik type player. Really solid defensively but has some offensive ability. Essentially a solid number two pairing guy.Personally i would try to swap Matheson for a defensive RHD
Guhle - Savard
Hutson - defensive RHD acquired for Matheson
Xhekaj - Barron
Struble
Matheson and Hutson are too similar and we have nobody on the right to play with them. I think Matheson is a good 1st test for KH. He's a local player so hard to trade him but at the same time it would only be logical to trade him with Hutson coming in.
I'm not arguaing trading matheson for a 3rd pairing dman He has his flaws but he is a top 4 offensive dman and some teams are looking for that. I mean Carolina has been trying plan Z for this role for 3 years now. Teams keep rotating the Gustafsson and Grossebière of this world because they need offense from the blueline. I'd be willing to add a bit to Matheson to grab a good 2nd pairing defensive dman able to skate and be solid all aroud.Yeah, but I’d want that RD to have some mobility. As I said a Hamrlik type player. Really solid defensively but has some offensive ability. Essentially a solid number two pairing guy.
That's a very large range of players.I'm interested by this...just looking quickly for the that type of Dman from non contenders, I came up with the following list.
Brandon Carlo - Bruins
David Jiricek (not a veteran but i'd take a flyer), Severson - Blue Jackets
Scott Mayfield - Isles
Colton Parayko - Blues
Dante Fabbro - Predators
Rasmus Andersson - Flames (obviously)
I want to reiterate, i'm not suggesting that all of these players would solve everything or are top pairing guys, but just help add a bit bit more stability
I wonder when Hughes feels compelled to make a move.Top 4 RD would help stabilize things.
I wonder when Hughes feels compelled to make a move.
Outside of trading vets on expiring contract and acquiring a vet for a cheap price i don't see him doing anything before next summer.I wonder when Hughes feels compelled to make a move.
I don't see adding a vet RD as a panic move though. I see it as a practical solution to a problem that we're going to have regardless of whether this team was going to be improving or not. You need some veteran presence in the lineup and that's lacking on that backend.Probably not at all outside of making an example of a veteran.
They wanted to see some progression but if there isn't any by trade deadline, then the strides they expected the team and players to make, they didn't make and they'll need to re-assess.
Never got the sense this management group would ever skirt the long term plan because it wasn't happening on the earliest possible timeline it could.
I don't see adding a vet RD as a panic move though. I see it as a practical solution to a problem that we're going to have regardless of whether this team was going to be improving or not. You need some veteran presence in the lineup and that's lacking on that backend.
We'll see. I think adding a vet on RD is a good move regardless.They will do small things but when I picture 'making a move', I think it more impactful than just picking up a vet piece or adding a depth player to send Condotta down.
Other RHD William Borgen and Connor Murphy both big and Physical.I'm interested by this...just looking quickly for the that type of Dman from non contenders, I came up with the following list.
Brandon Carlo - Bruins
David Jiricek (not a veteran but i'd take a flyer), Severson - Blue Jackets
Scott Mayfield - Isles
Colton Parayko - Blues
Dante Fabbro - Predators
Rasmus Andersson - Flames (obviously)
I want to reiterate, i'm not suggesting that all of these players would solve everything or are top pairing guys, but just help add a bit bit more stability
The habs can't be thinking that replacing Savard's roster spot with Mailloux for next season is all they need to do for their 7 D men. That would be absolutely insane. So, at some point, between now and the start of next season, they do need to add another (and very likely 2) veteran Dman.I don't see adding a vet RD as a panic move though. I see it as a practical solution to a problem that we're going to have regardless of whether this team was going to be improving or not. You need some veteran presence in the lineup and that's lacking on that backend.
Yeah, a bridge player who can carry the load for a while.The habs can't be thinking that replacing Savard's roster spot with Mailloux for next season is all they need to do for their 7 D men. That would be absolutely insane. So, at some point, between now and the start of next season, they do need to add another (and very likely 2) veteran Dman.
They hoped for too much from Barron/Struble/X to figure it out on their own.