dackelljuneaubulis02
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2012
- 11,861
- 7,472
Ahhh that was an old tweetThat was like a month ago bruh
Ahhh that was an old tweetThat was like a month ago bruh
It's a bit disappointing that he hasn't continued his encouraging progression from last year into this year, especially given the contract he received.
He's clearly not yet able to be the engine on a line and is falling back into bad habits we saw at the beginning of his sophomore season.
Yet this is a player who has shown he can take leaps forward mid season. Leave him with Suzuki where he has shown the most progress.
He's the ultimate Project. 1OA but a project. I never would've thought to see such a thing.
Terrible take. Bottom shelf. None of them were considered projects at the time of their draft, they just took longer to get going -- completely different.Apparently you weren't following the NHL when any of :
MacKinnon
Hischier
Lafreniere
Hughes
Let alone most of the dmen drafted 1OA, Etc etc were drafted?
I appreciate that you've reiterated my assertion.It's actually quite common for NHLers drafted 1OA to take a few years to develop consistency to their game. Nothing surprising, uncommon or "unseen" about Slaf's development curve at all...
I dont mind benching Slaf as it was deserved. He made a stupid, irresponsible play and he learned his lesson, but really hate the double standard from MSL.
We are tiptoeing around Dach who has been atrocious, but he still plays top6 and PP1. Same applies to Newhook. I am not even talking about our amazing vet group.
I'm not worried about Slaf. He's still so young and raw. One step back, two step forward as you say.I was warning people about this last year. He will be back, but it's all part of the evolution that players go through especially the bigger guys.
I was encouraged what I saw last year, but the road is not a smooth linear path.
Many will castigate you for this perspective, but, really, if you watch Slafkovsky play absent bias and the natural desire to see him perform well to justify his selection, his performance this year has been radically sub-par. There have been precious few standout moments or demonstrations of skill; eleven points in seventeen games with only a single goal is radically disappointing in the extreme, particularly when he's generating no scoring chances and rarely seems to even be able to get off a shot, averaging just over one per game.
Frankly, the conclusion to his previous year is looking more like a fluke statistical anomaly considering how poor his hockey sense and decision making has been from the outset - one of his great deficiencies that led him to taking so many massive hits in the first year.
What is strange is Slaf goals numbers..... Did we not draft him for his ability to score and his size. Only goal is not looking good for him.He didn't play 17 games. He missed 2 iirc. It's 1 goal, 11 assists, for 12 pts in 15 games, which is not subpar.
At the time you made your post, he was at 12 pts in 14 gms.
He definitely needs to score more and be more consistent and look alive, but his ppg is right where you would expect it to be.
No, he has always been a playmaker, people got fooled by the Olympics.What is strange is Slaf goals numbers..... Did we not draft him for his ability to score and his size. Only goal is not looking good for him.