RizzleMcRib
Cheeseburgers and rocket ships.
Excuse my ignorance, but does vinyl make a significant difference?
For me I'd say yes. On older 60s and 70s recordings, totally. It's the closest you'll get to what the artist intended it to be. Analog. What was recorded was pretty much what you're gonna get. Yeah, you could cut and splice tape, but it was nothing like you see today with things like Pro Tools where you can drag, drop, cut, paste with ease. Digital recording wasn't really widely introduced until the early 80s. There is a reason when some popular album is remastered, the source is a big deal to some. Original tapes, compared to some digital source. Why get a digitally remastered copy of something that sounds just like the CD? Just buy the CD.
When it comes to newer artists, if it's something I really like, Tame Impala for example, even digitally mastered, I enjoy having a tangible recording of that album. Sure Spotify is easy, but it has lead to many artists, in my opinion, to stop actually sitting down and taking the time to make an album. It's also made for some really lazy listeners. You don't take the time to actually stop and enjoy listening to the songs on that album. For me, there isn't much that beats putting on a record sitting there holding the actual artwork while you actually listen. Not some background music in your car on the way to work or on your computer while your searching Facebook. It almost forces you to listen to the whole album, yeah you can queue up songs, but why? If the artist spent then time to record and album (compared to majority of artists now who just make singles for the Spotify generation) as a listener take the time to listen to it through. To me, some of the best songs on some of the greatest albums weren't the singles. Not only that, but if you really like an artist, why not support that artist by buying their music?
Another reason for me is growing up I remember my parents putting on albums. Even though I was a child of the 80s, something about vinyl brings back memories of that.
Lastly, for sake of not boring you anymore than I have already, think of a record recorded in 1967. That object is 50 years old. It has a story. I don't mean in the music, I mean in the actual physical object itself. Anytime I break out Jimi Hendrix Axis: Bold as Love, I can't help but wonder how many joints were probably rolled using that gatefold cover. The travel of that record is a story within itself.
This completly 100% is my opinion. Some people enjoy the ease of a skip button or the versatility and compatability of an iPod, but for me there is really no other way to go. I still have CDs, but they sit in a box somewhere taking up space.
Plus I just prefer the warmer, more soothing sound of vinyl. I probably could have just typed that and answered your question.
Last edited: