Hopefully the Samuelis have taken notice.
This is basically what they're banking on is people like me: won't outright boycott the team and will still probably go to games, but are aware of what he's done and have to bury it deep in the recesses of my consciousness to try and simply enjoy the product*
*This could change though and although I would never root for another team, I could just end up following the league. Honestly, I'm a lot more on edge than I thought I was going to be when this idea was first pitched; it makes me mentally sick to think that after all the chirping I did about everyone involved that the public face of the whole ordeal might lead this hockey team.
Because winning matters more than anything else. Which, paradoxically, is the exact mentality that led to the Aldridge situation unfolding the way it did.Wow why would we do this. I really don’t get it
It's a very cynical view if that's how they see it.
I just remember when Bowman went to the Oilers, even a few supporters were like "well he's put in the work, so if he's learned then he deserves another chance." Well he hasn't learned, obviously, it was all for show. AND the team is worse.
So ask yourself, for those of you who are into 2nd chances ... how will you feel if Q comes in, but turns out to be not changed at all when first opportunity presents itself? And on top of that, if he doesn't bring the success on ice you hope for (which is well within the realm of possibility)? Still gonna feel good about the hire?
It's entirely possible he'll be subpoenaed in the John Doe lawsuit as well. If he pulls a Bowman and tries to quash it, will that bother you at all?
If you just want a Cup winning coach with no baggage, there's guys out there. If you just want an old school guy who gets good results, there's guys out there.
Tommy Gorman, Dick Irvin, Scotty Bowman. That's the list of coaches who have replicated their Cup winning success with a 2nd team. The entire list. Does anyone really think Q is gonna join that group? And if not, if that's not the expectation, then why is he any more preferable than a veteran coach who has good results but no Cup?
Or if a Cup win means so damn much to you, then go get Bylsma.
Where did you see this?Buccigross seems to think Carle is out for the Ducks. Not much substance but he feels Utah is the darkhorse if Carle leaves college.
I kind of want to move on just to avoid the baggage. It doesn't matter what he does to make amends or how many victims give their blessing, some people are going to be outraged. And that's the best case scenario. More likely, PV would not be the most eloquent and it would leave everyone with more questions.
I don't think the organization needs that.
Where did you see this?
He is/was an incredibly talented in-game tactician. He would be the most talented coach this franchise has ever had.Obviously there are real concerns with Q off the ice, but does anyone have insight on the type of coach he is on the ice?
I wasn’t really following hockey as closely back when he was coaching, so I’ve got no clue how he is as a coach.
Hate to bump Sicard, but this is kinda true. At best, the Samuelis are straight up negligent with dealing with the hockey ops side of things.
Aside from the obvious, this is the crux of the issue entirely and why I'm stunned this is even being considered. There's very little upside to this move in the first place, but the downside is tremendous to the point of losing a not so insignificant portion of the fanbase for good.
This is so easy: just hire someone else. Literally ANYONE else. Especially since you have probably the best situation of any team with a coaching opening in the sport.
It's a very cynical view if that's how they see it.
I just remember when Bowman went to the Oilers, even a few supporters were like "well he's put in the work, so if he's learned then he deserves another chance." Well he hasn't learned, obviously, it was all for show. AND the team is worse.
So ask yourself, for those of you who are into 2nd chances ... how will you feel if Q comes in, but turns out to be not changed at all when first opportunity presents itself? And on top of that, if he doesn't bring the success on ice you hope for (which is well within the realm of possibility)? Still gonna feel good about the hire?
It's entirely possible he'll be subpoenaed in the John Doe lawsuit as well. If he pulls a Bowman and tries to quash it, will that bother you at all?
If you just want a Cup winning coach with no baggage, there's guys out there. If you just want an old school guy who gets good results, there's guys out there.
Tommy Gorman, Dick Irvin, Scotty Bowman. That's the list of coaches who have replicated their Cup winning success with a 2nd team. The entire list. Does anyone really think Q is gonna join that group? And if not, if that's not the expectation, then why is he any more preferable than a veteran coach who has good results but no Cup?
Or if a Cup win means so damn much to you, then go get Bylsma.
Think it’s being done hereDoes anyone know how to get in touch with the Ducks through their website about this? There are a ton of sections and I didn't find a contact us spot on the most obvious choices.
Hate to bump Sicard, but this is kinda true. At best, the Samuelis are straight up negligent with dealing with the hockey ops side of things.
Aside from the obvious, this is the crux of the issue entirely and why I'm stunned this is even being considered. There's very little upside to this move in the first place, but the downside is tremendous to the point of losing a not so insignificant portion of the fanbase for good.
This is so easy: just hire someone else. Literally ANYONE else. Especially since you have probably the best situation of any team with a coaching opening in the sport.
Short version: I think McIlvane is the de facto coach-in-waiting.
I think Verbeek was hoping Cronin would instill work ethic and toughness and defense and all that stuff in the meantime. Maybe he'd last three years and McIlvane would be ready by then. Or maybe Cronin would get extended for a couple years. In reality, Cronin sucked and got fired, but Verbeek still needs someone to bridge the gap until McIlvane is ready. And, scandal aside, Quenneville is the perfect candidate.
I've heard this goes to the ticketing office but beyond that there's no way to contact the team directly short of pestering the Twitter and IG admins or inundating the team store with calls. If enough people write to the team with that form, it will get through to those with the authority to make these decisions.Think it’s being done here
![]()
Official Anaheim Ducks Website | Anaheim Ducks
The official National Hockey League website including news, rosters, stats, schedules, teams, and video.www.nhl.com
That’s not really what happened with Babcock, though. The truth is that Q, should he coach again, is highly unlikely to be in a similar situation again for various reasons, chiefly that should something happen it should be dealt with swiftly from much higher levels.This may very well end up being similar to the Blue Jackets situation from two years ago: they hire him, they get dragged through the mud and piled on by opposing fans, Ducks' fans essentially riot, and then they have to pivot and fire him anyway. Might as well just cut out the middleman and stay away.
If a bridge coach is all that's needed/wanted, then there's a LOT of pretty good options out there, who have solid track records.
Yeah it’s just what I’ve seen going around on twitter. I’m sure its a combination of that and direct replies and messages going around that have been noticedI've heard this goes to the ticketing office but beyond that there's no way to contact the team directly short of pestering the Twitter and IG admins or inundating the team store with calls. If enough people write to the team with that form, it will get through to those with the authority to make these decisions.
I'd say people can write to Lee, Present, Cavanagh, Stephens etc. but it seems like they've noticed and if Elliote Friedman noticed I'm sure the team is aware.
Not much more we can do short of STH deciding not to renew in droves.Yeah it’s just what I’ve seen going around on twitter. I’m sure its a combination of that and direct replies and messages going around that have been noticed
I don’t think this is accurate?- **Ryan O’Reilly (St. Louis Blues)**:
- On early career: “Q was my first NHL coach. He was tough on me as a rookie, but it taught me what it takes to be a pro. I owe a lot of my work ethic to him.” (Source: Denver Post, 2019, reflecting on Quenneville’s time with the Colorado Avalanche).