The Rise And Fall Of Mike Sullivan...

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
During the post-Cup Bylsma years Pittsburgh fans ate a lot of slop, that they feasted on nonetheless. The secret is...
...just keep feeding it to them. They will keep eating it and buying tickets, and merch, and remembering the good old days. If they start complaining, here's another disgusting helping of slop that you're going to chow down on boys and girls!
Pens were still an elite team back then, they were #1 in the NHL in points between 2010-2015. Just had some spectacular playoff failures. This is a far cry from that, they might actually be the worst team in the league.
 
Pens were still an elite team back then, they were #1 in the NHL in points between 2010-2015. Just had some spectacular playoff failures. This is a far cry from that, they might actually be the worst team in the league.

Not to mention we still made the playoffs back then too.

The “slop” back then was either injuries or shit goaltending
 
Pens were still an elite team back then, they were #1 in the NHL in points between 2010-2015. Just had some spectacular playoff failures. This is a far cry from that, they might actually be the worst team in the league.
Yea would you rather be perennially the best offensive team in the NHL with star players in their prime, or bottom of the East with the worst defense in the NHL and all your core players are almost 40? Lol.
 
Word was that Sid and the gang (Malkin and Letang) wanted Sullivan back for one last dance if they were to sign and stay like they did a couple of years ago.
Makes sense if the core wanted him back, there's very few players that have as much influence over a team as Sid does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BallardEra
Pens were still an elite team back then, they were #1 in the NHL in points between 2010-2015. Just had some spectacular playoff failures. This is a far cry from that, they might actually be the worst team in the league.

Forgive me, my issues have to do more with this organization's abject refusal to change despite what is so glaringly obvious to all.

I look at what teams like Washington and Minnesota are doing this year, all things considered, and wonder why Pittsburgh could not have put themselves in a better position over the course of the past several years. I get that we are not contenders but we should also not be an embarrassment.
 
They could be second last in the Conference after tonight.

Screenshot_20241125-224037~2.png
 
Last edited:
That roster is just awfull and so badly build& has been for some time

But the coach is the easiest one to blame in Pitt instead of going after the real issues

Dubas has set that team back so much already
how exactly has dubas set them back?
 
how exactly has dubas set them back?

Short answer?

They have the worst looking future in the league and roster that has zero chance at competing now

Dubas said when he got the job that he wants to build for the future and be able to compete at the same time


& as I said currently they are pretty much in the worst shape in the league and the next 8-10 years are looking painfully rough for them
 
If they fired him tomorrow morning - I'd literally go out and place a $100 bet that Penguins win the cup this season. I could see it happen.

This makes absolutely no sense.

You don't even have to blame him or to call him a bad coach- you can blame the players if you want. Call Crosby, Malkin & co a bunch of spoiled babies who can't be coached if you need to and who have given up on yet another coach. But this Pittsburgh core has reacted better to coaching changes than pretty much any other hockey core in the league in the past 20 years. Multiple times, Pittsburgh brought in a new coach when things weren't clicking, and right away Crosby/Malkin & Pitt end up contending for Cup and having a huge improvement in year 1.

Why wouldn't you try that again?

2006 season - Pens are bottom feeders....bring in Therrien. Pens go from 2nd to last in league, to a team playing 23 games above 500 the next season.

2009 - Bylsma hired mid-season, despite Pitt being a cup finalist, shocking move....and they go on to finish the season with an 18-3 record, and win the cup in year 1.

2016 - Pittsburgh going nowhere, Crosby sucking...Mike Sullivan comes in, and Crosby is back to a Ross/Hart contender, Pittsburgh make playoffs, win cup, and do it again the next year.

That's 3 coaches with extremely significant impact in year 1 in the Crosby/Malkin era.

Why wouldn't Pittsburgh try that again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodgerwilco
If they fired him tomorrow morning - I'd literally go out and place a $100 bet that Penguins win the cup this season. I could see it happen.

This makes absolutely no sense.

You don't even have to blame him or to call him a bad coach- you can blame the players if you want. Call Crosby, Malkin & co a bunch of spoiled babies who can't be coached if you need to and who have given up on yet another coach. But this Pittsburgh core has reacted better to coaching changes than pretty much any other hockey core in the league in the past 20 years. Multiple times, Pittsburgh brought in a new coach when things weren't clicking, and right away Crosby/Malkin & Pitt end up contending for Cup and having a huge improvement in year 1.

Why wouldn't you try that again?

2006 season - Pens are bottom feeders....bring in Therrien. Pens go from 2nd to last in league, to a team playing 23 games above 500 the next season.

2009 - Bylsma hired mid-season, despite Pitt being a cup finalist, shocking move....and they go on to finish the season with an 18-3 record, and win the cup in year 1.

2016 - Pittsburgh going nowhere, Crosby sucking...Mike Sullivan comes in, and Crosby is back to a Ross/Hart contender, Pittsburgh make playoffs, win cup, and do it again the next year.

That's 3 coaches with extremely significant impact in year 1 in the Crosby/Malkin era.

Why wouldn't Pittsburgh try that again?

Because as Therrien would say, “‘dey ‘don care..”
 
If they fired him tomorrow morning - I'd literally go out and place a $100 bet that Penguins win the cup this season. I could see it happen.
There is no way it happens with this team. Back then the core players were much younger.

They are now 37-38 years old with no good young pieces around to help them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary69
how exactly has dubas set them back?
Karlsson def didnt help. Everyone and their mother saw the Sharks Norris season being chaos all offense and no defense. Bringing him in while keeping Letang was a head scratcher. Obviously he wouldnt be allowed to play that recklessly in Pit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary69
If they fired him tomorrow morning - I'd literally go out and place a $100 bet that Penguins win the cup this season. I could see it happen.

This makes absolutely no sense.

You don't even have to blame him or to call him a bad coach- you can blame the players if you want. Call Crosby, Malkin & co a bunch of spoiled babies who can't be coached if you need to and who have given up on yet another coach. But this Pittsburgh core has reacted better to coaching changes than pretty much any other hockey core in the league in the past 20 years. Multiple times, Pittsburgh brought in a new coach when things weren't clicking, and right away Crosby/Malkin & Pitt end up contending for Cup and having a huge improvement in year 1.

Why wouldn't you try that again?

2006 season - Pens are bottom feeders....bring in Therrien. Pens go from 2nd to last in league, to a team playing 23 games above 500 the next season.

2009 - Bylsma hired mid-season, despite Pitt being a cup finalist, shocking move....and they go on to finish the season with an 18-3 record, and win the cup in year 1.

2016 - Pittsburgh going nowhere, Crosby sucking...Mike Sullivan comes in, and Crosby is back to a Ross/Hart contender, Pittsburgh make playoffs, win cup, and do it again the next year.

That's 3 coaches with extremely significant impact in year 1 in the Crosby/Malkin era.

Why wouldn't Pittsburgh try that again?
Have been saying and pointing out same since 2020
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rodgerwilco
If they fired him tomorrow morning - I'd literally go out and place a $100 bet that Penguins win the cup this season. I could see it happen.

This makes absolutely no sense.

You don't even have to blame him or to call him a bad coach- you can blame the players if you want. Call Crosby, Malkin & co a bunch of spoiled babies who can't be coached if you need to and who have given up on yet another coach. But this Pittsburgh core has reacted better to coaching changes than pretty much any other hockey core in the league in the past 20 years. Multiple times, Pittsburgh brought in a new coach when things weren't clicking, and right away Crosby/Malkin & Pitt end up contending for Cup and having a huge improvement in year 1.

Why wouldn't you try that again?

2006 season - Pens are bottom feeders....bring in Therrien. Pens go from 2nd to last in league, to a team playing 23 games above 500 the next season.

2009 - Bylsma hired mid-season, despite Pitt being a cup finalist, shocking move....and they go on to finish the season with an 18-3 record, and win the cup in year 1.

2016 - Pittsburgh going nowhere, Crosby sucking...Mike Sullivan comes in, and Crosby is back to a Ross/Hart contender, Pittsburgh make playoffs, win cup, and do it again the next year.

That's 3 coaches with extremely significant impact in year 1 in the Crosby/Malkin era.

Why wouldn't Pittsburgh try that again?
Might as well just give $100 to HF for server upkeep.

There's no way you can look at Crosby/Malkin's age, see the rest of the lineup and think they're one coach away from a deep run.
 
Karlsson def didnt help. Everyone and their mother saw the Sharks Norris season being chaos all offense and no defense. Bringing him in while keeping Letang was a head scratcher. Obviously he wouldnt be allowed to play that recklessly in Pit.
The Karlsson trade allowed them to get rid of bad contracts, he was gotten for essentially nothing. That was not a bad trade in a vaccum
 
Years ago (circa 2016, 2017), he was viewed as one of the better coaches in the NHL. He was praised and brought up in Coach of the Year conversations...

Now he's seen as a relic and possible politician. Many Penguins fans want him to be relieved of his duties.

I think it's quite obvious that his expiry date has passed... but what happened exactly?

Did his message become stale over time? Perhaps he couldn't adapt to a faster, higher scoring League? That would be ironic since he was credited with spearheading Pittsburgh's turnaround in the playoffs by having the team play a fast style that other teams had trouble against in the mid to late 2010s.

Maybe he simply isn't good enough to coach an aging and declining team to success. Are there that many coaches who would do better in his position?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad