Quattro
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2005
- 4,909
- 56
Great game, hopefully this changes our season around.
Not sure what Jordan Nolan is doing in the NHL though.
Three whole posts after a great win before someone goes negative. Nice effort!
Great game, hopefully this changes our season around.
Not sure what Jordan Nolan is doing in the NHL though.
Three whole posts after a great win before someone goes negative. Nice effort!
There is a tangible in the Hawks/Kings battles that I think makes a significant difference and that is this:
Crawford really seems to lose it in these big games against the Kings. He showed glimpses of this last season in the WCF, when he got upset when he let in a Jeff Carter goal in the third period of game 2 on the short side. Even the announcer (Eddie O I think it was) said that Crawford never had a chance on that goal and getting upset with himself was detrimental. (That's why I commented earlier that he seems to be his own worst enemy.)
He gets too emotional. He challenged Quick after the second period in game 6, if you all recall. That was just plain idiotic.
Last night, he reacted violently to letting in the Toffoli goal because Carter might have grazed him ever so slightly. No one in their right minds would have ever called that goalie interference but both Crawford and Eddie O lost it on that "non-call."
The point I am making is this: if these guys meet again in the WCF, the Kings can definitely get to Crawford; get under his skin. He plays poorly when he gets emotional. It's a huge tangible and it bears watching.
Also an example why the Kings are above average in the regular season. Cant play like this 3/4 of the season but its different in the playoffs.
I'm a little concerned about the fourth line only playing 6 min. One of the strengths of this team for the last couple years is the they could run 4 lines. Forwards will run out of gas for the stretch drive if they only play 3 lines for the next 3 months. Just as I a feel like DD might as well if they don't find help soon on back end.
There is a tangible in the Hawks/Kings battles that I think makes a significant difference and that is this:
Crawford really seems to lose it in these big games against the Kings. He showed glimpses of this last season in the WCF, when he got upset when he let in a Jeff Carter goal in the third period of game 2 on the short side. Even the announcer (Eddie O I think it was) said that Crawford never had a chance on that goal and getting upset with himself was detrimental. (That's why I commented earlier that he seems to be his own worst enemy.)
He gets too emotional. He challenged Quick after the second period in game 6, if you all recall. That was just plain idiotic.
Last night, he reacted violently to letting in the Toffoli goal because Carter might have grazed him ever so slightly. No one in their right minds would have ever called that goalie interference but both Crawford and Eddie O lost it on that "non-call."
The point I am making is this: if these guys meet again in the WCF, the Kings can definitely get to Crawford; get under his skin. He plays poorly when he gets emotional. It's a huge tangible and it bears watching.
He gets too emotional. He challenged Quick after the second period in game 6, if you all recall. That was just plain idiotic.
Ya, but you have to admit, that was pretty baller of Quick.
![]()
Nolan threw about 2-3 monster hits and was hard and heavy on the puck. Lay off the dude.
Ya, but you have to admit, that was pretty baller of Quick.
![]()
Crawford shakes his gloves like "you want to go?" Quicks like ..."F-off"
Crawford would quickly regret the challenge, I would think. Quick really needs to drop the gloves before he hangs them up.
Crawford really seems to lose it in these big games against the Kings. He showed glimpses of this last season in the WCF, when he got upset when he let in a Jeff Carter goal in the third period of game 2 on the short side. Even the announcer (Eddie O I think it was) said that Crawford never had a chance on that goal and getting upset with himself was detrimental. (That's why I commented earlier that he seems to be his own worst enemy.)
I always thought he was getting ****ed at Oduya, because he thought either Oduya tipped it or screened him. Whenever I watch it, I always think, "That's the difference between Quick & Crawford. Quick would never get ****ed at his d-man for a screen or tipped shot. Quick would say, 'I should've had that regardless'.".
It's bound to happen. My guess it's against Perron.