broadwayblue
Registered User
It's ok to be optimistic. But I'm also realistic. Vegas has us at +8000 to win the cup this season. That's the 6th worst odds in the league. I expect they are right and we finish far outside of the playoffs.
I'm w @broadwayblue on this... I believe you will not see that this season... I believe they will "compete" nightly but also lose a lot more than they win.Being a middling borderline team makes zero sense.
He also has to justify it for lthe schmuck season ticket holders like me. But the salary cap is what justifies it for Dolan. This isn't Derek Jeter who buys a team then has to sell his best players to make payroll. Dolan can pay to hit the cap and still make Bank without screwing the retool as long as he avoids long term deals (except JT - almost certainly not happening though)We are probably gonna suck. I hope we dont sign Leo Komorov. I know Dolan always is willing to spend money to make the team as good as possible. He has to justify it to the high priced corporate ticket holders. Personally, I would trade Hayes for Assets. Put in Anderson and Chytil as my 2nd and 3rd line centers. Lets see how the superstar coach that was hired accelerates development.
It is. Edm, buff, columb, islanders, etc have been bottoming out for what feels like forever with no cups to show for their bottoming out periods. The nyr meanwhile made multiple ecf appearances and a scf appearance while making numerous enormous draft and free agent blunders, losing a potential all star to death, another top 4 D to career ending freak concussion.Well look at that. And they never win the Cup either. Coincidence I guess.
They NEVER go with the consensus. I heard over on Blueshirt Underground Radio said that they think they're the smartest guys in the room and no one knows what they know. So when they pick, you see every other table shuffling papers to go down the list to see where our pick was. It's a total joke. One cup in almost 80 years does speak for itself.
It is. Edm, buff, columb, islanders, etc have been bottoming out for what feels like forever with no cups to show for their bottoming out periods. The nyr meanwhile made multiple ecf appearances and a scf appearance while making numerous enormous draft and free agent blunders, losing a potential all star to death, another top 4 D to career ending freak concussion.
Feel preeetty good about what the nyr did without bottoming out. Sometimes luck plays a role in things. What did the nyr lead all but like 2 mins in several scf games? Didnt we all watch AV choke the series away game by game? Blaming the no tank boogieman just doesn't reflect what actually happened
Luck plays a role in things all the time, not just sometimes. You need to put yourself into a position to capitalize on luck, and in my opinion, in this league, that starts with anchoring your team with elite talent. You get elite talent at the top of drafts, which requires bottoming out.
And it's been discussed as nauseam on this board. Comparing the NYR to those teams you listed is pointless. All of those teams struggle to lure FAs and they're at the top of player's no trade lists. Those teams can't get over the hump because they can't lure the required support players. They are all essentially the inverse Rangers.
You cant bring up the tank boogieman which has also been brought up ad nauseam and then claim we can igmore all that's relevant to disproving the notion. We saw it for half a decade. The "cant win without tanking" theory is simply wrong. It's a good method for building a cup team. Id say Its likely the best. Its just not the only method
I'm not arguing that it's the only way. It's certainly the best, and you seem to agree. How do we differ here?
Look at what's being very heavily insinuated in your first post and then look at what you said in the next "It's a requirement". You didn't leave any room for anything other than the thought that a team has to get a top pick in the draft. If you don't feel that it's the only way but is very likely the best possibly way, then I agree. It's just your posts were indicating differently.I'm not arguing that it's the only way. It's certainly the best, and you seem to agree. How do we differ here?
We won 34 last season and we will be a worse team. I'm not sure how much worse b/c I see the following teams also being lousy: AZ, VAN, NYI, OTT, BUFF, MON.I dont think they are going to win 30 games this season.
We won 34 last season and we will be a worse team. I'm not sure how much worse b/c I see the following teams also being lousy: AZ, VAN, NYI, OTT, BUFF, MON.
I think Buffalo is going to climb a bit this season. The Habs might be marginally better with a healthy Carey Price.
But other teams figure to be awful.
I think Hank, at this point, doesn't steal nearly as many games as we think he will. I'll also go on record as saying that I have my doubts that he doesn't have a meltdown because of this defense at some point.
I think we'll finish in the bottom 10. Getting into the bottom 5 might prove difficult.
As of today we figure to be the worst team in the East. Every team who didn't make the playoffs but the Rangers has improved via new player acquisitions. Of course the season never plays out as it seems it likely will, but the reality is we probably will stink this season.
And JG is committed to the rebuild - the reason we didn't sign anyone good yesterday is he won't commit to more than 2 years for an older player. I agree with the strategy but I am trying to be realistic also. We have no players who are close to All-Star level - not one. And when we say the forward lines have a lot of talent that includes the very young guys who likely will not be that good next season and need a few years to develop. Our defense could be the worst in the league - even the crappy Islander D core is probably a tad better than ours on paper. And the King - who at this point is probably league average for starting goalies - will really have his emotional and mental state tested playing for a non-contender at this point in his career when his prime goal is to contend for the Cup.
Again, I agree with the strategy but it could be a tough watch this season.
Are we sure we are worse?
We are short Grabner, Nash, Miller and McDonagh, but we return Shattenkirk, we may add Chytil and Andersson for part or all of the season, we possibly return a rejuvenated (slightly) Brendan Smith. We get possible improvement from ADA and Pionk.
And everyone thought that AV lost the team, so if Quinn comes in and gets them playing hard.... I mean, if Buch, Vesey, Zibanejad, Hayes and Shattenkirk all have banner production years, they could easily be better than last year.
And I say that as a bad thing because I actually do want this team to tank. But it may be too talented.
Are we sure we are worse?
We are short Grabner, Nash, Miller and McDonagh, but we return Shattenkirk, we may add Chytil and Andersson for part or all of the season, we possibly return a rejuvenated (slightly) Brendan Smith. We get possible improvement from ADA and Pionk.
And everyone thought that AV lost the team, so if Quinn comes in and gets them playing hard.... I mean, if Buch, Vesey, Zibanejad, Hayes and Shattenkirk all have banner production years, they could easily be better than last year.
And I say that as a bad thing because I actually do want this team to tank. But it may be too talented.