We don’t have the D the 2019 team had, but I like our 4 lines just as much
I think there is a legitimate argument that the current D (with Parayko) is on par or close to the 2019 group. It is constructed differently and is weaker in areas, but it is also stronger in areas.
The top 3 isn't as good. Petro, Parayko, J-Bo is just an overall better group than Parayko, Fowler, Broberg. I'm not going to make a case that Parayko, Fowler, and Broberg will give you 25+, 25, and 23 minutes as good as Petro, Parayko, and Bo did in the 2019 playoffs. And the current group doesn't have a pair that can as effectively play the 'matchup shut down' role that Bo-Parayko played. I also don't think that any of the three will provide the performance Petro did in the 2019 playoffs. If the strength/value/quality of the groups ends at the comparison of the top 3, then 2019 is absolutely better overall.
But our current top 3 does have
significantly more offensive pop than the top 3 in 2019. Petro was the only guy who cracked 30 points out of that trio and the three of them combined for 26 goals and 86 points in the regular season (in 229 combined games played). Parayko, Fowler, and Broberg currently have combined for 30 goals and 89 points through 164 combined games played. I know offense is up around the league, but they've outscored the 2019 top 3 in 65 fewer games played. That's a huge gap. Dunn's 12 goals dwarf's Faulk's 4 this year, but Faulk is currently only 3 points behind Dunn's season-long total in 2019 and will likely match or eclipse Dunn's point total by the end of the year. All in all, while the top of our D group doesn't have the shut down ability the 2019 group did, they also are way more involved in the offense than the 2019 group was. The current blueline's ability to engage in the offensive zone without allowing rushes the other way is a big part of this team's identity that didn't exist at nearly the level of effectiveness in 2019.
Additionally, I think the bottom half of our current D is absolutely better than the bottom half of the 2019 group. The big 3 that year was good enough that we got away with really sheltering the bottom half of the D group, but it is kind of easy to forget just how much we relied on those 3 horses to carry the load. They were our only D who played 17+ minutes a night in the 2019 playoffs. They were also the only 3 D who played 20+ minutes a night in the regular season. We had to mix-and-match partners with Petro and Petro was the level of player that could still be a stud through that mixing and matching. But we didn't have a defined, consistent top pair that was out there together in all situations. Eddy was on the top pair some nights and a healthy scratch other nights. Petro got multiple shifts every night with someone other than his 'usual' partner and his 'usual partner wasn't consistent. And then we really limited the minutes of the 3rd pair.
Faulk (for all his warts) is a better overall player than any of Gunnar, Dunn, Eddy, and Bortz was at that stage of their careers.
Suter is more capable of soaking up minutes effectively than Gunnar, Eddy, or Bortz.
While Leddy and Tucker are both playing their off side as the 3RD, I think that both are comfortably relied on to provide more than the 12:19 Berube trusted Bortz to handle in the 17 games he was in the lineup in the playoffs and there were 9 playoff games where we had a LHD as the 3RD in that run.
I think there is a noticeable gap between the current #4-7 D men and the 2019 #4-7. There are plenty of Cup winners who have had success leaning extra-heavy on the top 4 while only using the 3rd pair to soak up enough minutes to let those guys catch their breath. Our 2019 team certainly wasn't unique for doing that and the coaching staff handled the 4-7 guys beautifully in our Cup run. But there is also a tangible advantage to having a 3rd pair that doesn't scare the hell out of the coach.
I'm not going to say that someone is wrong if they feel the 2019 D group was better than the current group, but I think that there is a real argument that the current groups is as good overall and even if you disagree, the gap isn't massive. The 2019 team was 2nd in expected goals against per 60 after Berube took over. The current team is also 2nd since Monty took over. Parayko is having a career year and the additions of Broberg/Fowler have turned this blueline into a damn good group. The style and strengths of our current D group is different than the 2019 group, but I'm not sold that it is definitively worse.