CheckingLineCenter
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2018
- 9,422
- 12,944
The Steelers missed out on Flacco too.
How do you get tweets to look like this
The Steelers missed out on Flacco too.
Just trade him. They've won nothing with him; who cares about Defensive Player of the Year award; I don't. They won't be winning anything in the near future. He's getting older and beat up. Set yourself up for (hopefully) the next Super Bowl winning cycle.I actually love Shadeur as a competitor. I like his arrogance and cockiness, even if it does go overboard. The issue I have is that he's cocky but his talent can't back it up like his Dad, and when he gets exposed he gets whiny.
No! That's what I'm trying to say. This isn't about a top QB. You keep seeing "Arch." The college QBs next year are better and many are less of projects than any of these guys. The crops of QBs are just so much better in future years where we DO get aggressive for our guy. Trade the whole f***ing draft if he's there.
My end game if I were king of the Steelers would be to do what we have to do in this draft to fill our weaknesses (that line up perfectly with this draft) and go all in on QBs the next 2 years. We walk out with 1 or even 2.
I'm also NOT against taking Shadeur or Dart. I just wouldn't do it at 21 and we don't have a 2nd if one of them falls.
I think for me, this draft lines up with our weaknesses and we have such better odds in the years following. I get that we don't know if these guys are going to be anything, but if you were a betting man and someone said "you can pick from this bucket, there's a gold flake in a bucket of sand, or here's a gold nickel in a bucket of sand...which one would you rather wade in?" You want to work with the pool that has less risky. This is legit the riskiest QB class since Pickett's class. We also have history - that class compares to this one...none of those guys are on their original teams.
You nailed it - the intangibles of the guys coming up are just absurd.
I would be totally shocked if they even play hardball with him, but if they aren't going to re-sign him, or they are going to hold out, they should just do the full rebuild instead of dicking around with a franchise legend.
Just trade him. They've won nothing with him; who cares about Defensive Player of the Year award; I don't. They won't be winning anything in the near future. He's getting older and beat up. Set yourself up for (hopefully) the next Super Bowl winning cycle.
But, we know they won't do that because they'll cave to him like weasels.
Eh, politely disagree.As an asset management POV, I agree. Sometimes assets do not matter. If TJ wants to retire a Steeler, he really should. He's a first ballot HOFer. Add him to the list. TJ being in 1 jersey should happen unless he doesn't want it to.
Franco Harris played or the Seattle Seahawks after the Steelers released him in 1984. It was at the end of his career and did not go well, but the Steelers at the time (Dan Rooney) was able to cut the cord, something Art II would be unwilling/unable to do. They got to the AFC Championship game with Walter Abercrombie, Frank Pollard and Rich Erenberg playing Running Back for them.As an asset management POV, I agree. Sometimes assets do not matter. If TJ wants to retire a Steeler, he really should. He's a first ballot HOFer. Add him to the list. TJ being in 1 jersey should happen unless he doesn't want it to.
Yea man, who better to train the next generation on winning than a bunch of guys who have never won a playoff game.I'm gonna keep banging this drum - people look way too much at ageing stars in terms of win now and not enough in terms of prepping the next generation. It was one thing for the star studded Steelers of old to be ruthless, but this team has some pretty thin leadership.
Also, if someone wants to come and blow us away with an offer then great, but the same age and new contract issues that have people spooked about keeping him are also going to limit his return so who knows if that happens.
I'm not against trading Watt. I just don't think it's the no brainer move that so many seem to think it is.
I watch watt and I watch Garrett and it's hard for me to understand why everyone is so sure TJ is the better player. When the browns signed Garrett to that deal I thought wow that's a lot of money when you don't have a prayer of winning a championship. And now Watt thinks he should get more than Garrett from a team who has Mason Rudolph at QB. It just feels like too much.
I'm gonna keep banging this drum - people look way too much at ageing stars in terms of win now and not enough in terms of prepping the next generation. It was one thing for the star studded Steelers of old to be ruthless, but this team has some pretty thin leadership.
Also, if someone wants to come and blow us away with an offer then great, but the same age and new contract issues that have people spooked about keeping him are also going to limit his return so who knows if that happens.
I'm not against trading Watt. I just don't think it's the no brainer move that so many seem to think it is.
College football is in a great place. Iamaleava got a massive deal to play at Tennessee and wasn’t anything special last year.
Can he transfer elsewhere now or is that closed for the year? Assuming he can transfer I guess he'll probably be fine since he'll get a job and a bag. Might also improve his draft stock going to a better program.
There’s a real good chance Kublink is next year’s Dart. Sellers is Milroe. Ward Dart and Sanders were all transfers. My favorite player to watch next season is Leavitt Ward compared him to ben and Allar has more ups than WardIf he can't get a good landing spot at a P5 school he may not come out in 26. We know Arch isn't likely to come out, so the 26 class might not be as great as anticipated. If the Steelers wait until next year to get a QB they could face the same questionable level of talent they'll see in 25.
If he can't get a good landing spot at a P5 school he may not come out in 26. We know Arch isn't likely to come out, so the 26 class might not be as great as anticipated. If the Steelers wait until next year to get a QB they could face the same questionable level of talent they'll see in 25.
That's wild. Wonder where he ends up? Saw some speculation USC.
Kind of conflicted on this stuff. I'm glad the kids are getting paid instead of just padding the pockets of people in suits, but it has ruined the 'school pride' or whatever you want to call it that used to be one of the selling points of college football.
I don't think it reflects well on Nico, though. Right before the season starts you pull this and from what I've seen Tennessee said he's kind of just gone dark on them. Not very professional or a sign of a leader.
Depends on what your goals are as in organization. If TJ asks to be traded sure they will make it happen.am i right in thinking contract negotiations breaking down with tj is best case scenario for the steelers? wrong side of 30 and playing for a quarterback-less franchise is not a recipe for winning in this nfl
Depends on what your goals are as in organization. If TJ asks to be traded sure they will make it happen.
They wouldn’t be playing the waiting game on Rodgers if they were going to proactively trade TJ. No different than Garrett in Cleveland
TJ has repeatedly said being a 1 helmet guy is important to him and his brother said the Steelers could have gotten a discount if they extended him before last season then Garrett got paidWhat's funny is that Garrett shut up about his trade demands once he got paid more $$
I don't see TJ and MG as having the same motivations.