OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: Kansas City Swifts vs Philly Eagles

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
The reasons listed above of why the Steelers could move on from Najee Harris, a glut of talented RBs in the draft, the perception of his flaws, are a reason he might be back.

He might not get the money he is expecting on the open market.

Here's the thing. I could kinda get bringing Harris back if he was real cheap and the logic was ploughing resources into everything else, but when there's reports suggesting a deal in the 7-10m region? That he'll get the money he expects on the open market, just the Steelers will match to bring him back?

If that comes true, that makes no damn sense.
 
Here's the thing. I could kinda get bringing Harris back if he was real cheap and the logic was ploughing resources into everything else, but when there's reports suggesting a deal in the 7-10m region? That he'll get the money he expects on the open market, just the Steelers will match to bring him back?

If that comes true, that makes no damn sense.

I don't see any market for Najee Harris at 3 years, $25m or so. If it happens I would be fascinated.

Truly the only rationale for bringing back both Harris and Warren is to spend zero draft capital at RB this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaded-Fan
I don't see any market for Najee Harris at 3 years, $25m or so. If it happens I would be fascinated.

Truly the only rationale for bringing back both Harris and Warren is to spend zero draft capital at RB this year.

I'm not necessarily expecting it, but it wouldn't surprise me. It's basically some team wanting David Montgomery on David Montgomery money and deciding he's the best version available.
 
Here's the thing. I could kinda get bringing Harris back if he was real cheap and the logic was ploughing resources into everything else, but when there's reports suggesting a deal in the 7-10m region? That he'll get the money he expects on the open market, just the Steelers will match to bring him back?

If that comes true, that makes no damn sense.
I'd much rather spend a rookie contract and most likely get the same production. Then spend the saved capital on an aging DL or subpar WR corp or... whatever in ufa.
 
I don't see any market for Najee Harris at 3 years, $25m or so. If it happens I would be fascinated.

Truly the only rationale for bringing back both Harris and Warren is to spend zero draft capital at RB this year.
Montgomery Hubbard Mixon Connor Stevenson all got 8 million or more this season. Swift got 8 million
Warren again could just get 2/6 million they paid Patterson

I don't see any market for Najee Harris at 3 years, $25m or so. If it happens I would be fascinated.

Truly the only rationale for bringing back both Harris and Warren is to spend zero draft capital at RB this year.
Hubbard Mixon Connor Stevenson all got 8 million or more this season.
 
Koreza said they have to spend 80 million and new money this season and next. We will probably bring in a free agent on the watt threshold and queen threshold. He said he thinks they dump larry and Lowry sign a free agent Dl and draft 2
 
I'd much rather spend a rookie contract and most likely get the same production. Then spend the saved capital on an aging DL or subpar WR corp or... whatever in ufa.

See, this is why I'd rather sign an experienced RB, and use the draft capital on a hopefully more impactful DL or WR.
 
See, this is why I'd rather sign an experienced RB, and use the draft capital on a hopefully more impactful DL or WR.
Oh don't get me wrong. I still want DL 1st round if one is available and WR round 2 or 3 if there'sa good CB in 2. I just think there's quality RBs to be had in rounds 3 through 5.
I just feel you can/should strengthen your depth in your weakest positions before the draft. Gives more flexibility. And we all know, picks don't always work out.
 
Oh don't get me wrong. I still want DL 1st round if one is available and WR round 2 or 3 if there'sa good CB in 2. I just think there's quality RBs to be had in rounds 3 through 5.
I just feel you can/should strengthen your depth in your weakest positions before the draft. Gives more flexibility. And we all know, picks don't always work out.
Most reports say rb and dl are deep cb and wr in the draft aren’t deep
Hopefully they address some issues with the roster in free agency before the draft
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad