The Paul Maurice Pitchfork Thread (MOD Warning Post #1)

Mogo

Registered User
Jun 26, 2002
25,744
11,695
So all the posters who are over the top negative every season, to the point of being an annoyance, are now annoyed THIS is too premature?

LOL, cant make this stuff up....

Nah. Most of us dont expect much from this season. A transition season. Have to accept it.
I mean just look at the roster. Cant expect much. Hopefullu Zito makes the right moves next off season to get this back on track. If we made the playoffs Id consider that a huge win. I dont see a reason personally to panic yet with what Maurice has here to work with (gimme couple more weeks) 😂

Not having our 1st rounder protected pisses me off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BabyBennettov

IceManCat

#StanleyCupChampions2024🏆
Jul 13, 2006
6,382
3,086
The Rat Den
I don't think Ekblad being injured has much to do with it. I think I'm gonna agree with Vendetta and others: Maurice has turned a fun, creative offensive group into a bunch of mud-slogging blockheads.

The good news is, there is still plenty of time for him to put his ego in check and have them open things up a bit.
He said this at the start of the season that he would play this style. It's a "playoff" style and we got beat last year because we didn't play a playoff style, according to him at least.
 

BeezKnees

Registered User
Jun 4, 2010
2,211
2,148
Orlando, FL
The fact that we're bad/mediocre at this style of play is the point of why we're playing it. This is what we're going to look like in the playoffs again until we push through and learn to excel at this style
 
  • Like
Reactions: drktmplr12

Dr Beinfest

Registered User
Jun 11, 2012
3,881
2,889
Washington, DC
The fact that we're bad/mediocre at this style of play is the point of why we're playing it. This is what we're going to look like in the playoffs again until we push through and learn to excel at this style
Say what you want about the 5 on 5 and the transition play needing to change, but there’s zero truth to that regarding special teams and the playoffs. And special teams doesn’t look particularly different. Just worse.
 

KW

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 21, 2006
13,318
11,787
Here are my longer term concerns
- PP
- PK
- 4th line (Staal)
- Replacing Hornquist
- Carlson and Kiersted
- Coach’s 2nd/3rd line combos

Here are my NOT longer term concerns
- 5v5
- Bob and Knight
- Barkov, at all
- Reinhart
- Lundell

Here are my question marks
- Bennett
- Balcers
- Cousins
- Coach
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 Hole

pantherbot

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 7, 2006
6,058
8,147
I'm not sure what you are criticizing exactly? That we're boring? I think it's fine to call out things you don't like about Maurice's style etc., but for some people to call for him to be fired 10 games into the season? I'm not even sure what the point is, he's obviously still going to be here for at least the next two years. Are we really going to have "fire maurice" calls after every loss or less-than-overwhelming win?

Yeah the power play % is awful, but again, we're shooting at an awful rate and it absolutely won't stay like that. The lowest power play shooting percentage in a season has been 8%, we're shooting at <6%. If we were shooting at 8%, that brings PP% back to 15% conversion. If we shot at a still-low 10%, our PP% would be 20%, which is pretty respectable. How many posts has Reinhart alone hit? And those don't even count as shots. And we're doing this without Ekblad.

The PK I agree isn't great, but also not basement awful. I think they can do better on denying entries and be better at defending cross ice passes, but we're also missing our best (or third best according to some people) defender.

And we're handicapped by the cap this year, that's just the reality of getting Tkachuk who looks great so far and the stupid Yandle buyout. Having the Staal bros hasn't been great and they seem almost net negative, especially Eric, but that's not on Maurice. He's got limited options. Fact is, our roster is pretty different from last year without Huber, Weegar, Marchment, Duke, and Ekblad. We aren't going to look like the same team and we have less depth this year.
 

FrolikFan67

Registered User
Apr 29, 2012
7,353
4,075
I wouldn’t judge until we see how effective we look in the playoffs under his direction l. The point he keeps preaching is to consistently play this style since this is how they’ll need to play in the postseason. We know there are styles that work much better in the regular season than in the playoffs and vice versa. So even if we don’t set the world on fire during the regular season it may serve us better in the playoffs. We’ll just have to wait and see, but this is all playoff training in my view. And then we’ll see if it actually looks good when that time comes. Not comparing us to the kings but didn’t they barely make the playoffs as an 8th seed before steamrolling to a Stanley cup? I don’t think we’re at a Stanley cup level right now but trying to illustrate the point that so-so regular season teams can look a lot different when the playoffs begin.

It’s promising that our already thin D looks decent even with Ekblad out. Essentially not Ekblad or Weegar and still hanging in there. That’s no small feat. Goaltending hasn’t been terrible but it could certainly be better. 5v5 play looks solid, we just need some of our key guys to get it going. The biggest point of improvement will simply be the special teams, they’ll need to think of something to make both the PP and PK effective. Obviously with our talent there’s no excuse to not have a good PP and with guys like Barkov, Lundell, and luostarinen we should have a better PK too
 

CanePanther

Registered User
Jan 4, 2022
1,731
1,359
Nah. Most of us dont expect much from this season. A transition season. Have to accept it.
I mean just look at the roster. Cant expect much. Hopefullu Zito makes the right moves next off season to get this back on track. If we made the playoffs Id consider that a huge win. I dont see a reason personally to panic yet with what Maurice has here to work with (gimme couple more weeks) 😂

Not having our 1st rounder protected pisses me off.
How do you get that we are predicted as one of the top 3 teams to win the cup ?????
 
  • Like
Reactions: scholl

letsgrowcactus

Registered User
Jan 21, 2017
4,794
5,280
Not a fan of the Maurice hiring at all, but let's see where we're at by the end of this month.

I do wonder, what's the plan if this season is a bust? How much rope will Zito give Maurice? If we miss, do you fire him? If we don't miss but bow out in round 1 in an embarassing fashion, I guess you cross your fingers and hope next year's better? Fingers crossed they figure out the special teams soon, regain their swagger and this is just some idle speculation.
 

KW

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 21, 2006
13,318
11,787
Not a fan of the Maurice hiring at all, but let's see where we're at by the end of this month.

I do wonder, what's the plan if this season is a bust? How much rope will Zito give Maurice? If we miss, do you fire him? If we don't miss but bow out in round 1 in an embarassing fashion, I guess you cross your fingers and hope next year's better? Fingers crossed they figure out the special teams soon, regain their swagger and this is just some idle speculation.
When total amateur players like me can see some things that are glaringly wrong with the PP and PK, it really makes me wonder what these total pros do when they practice PP and PK. Like really, w t f.
 

scholl

Registered User
Jun 26, 2019
983
890
Helsinki, Finland
Nah. Most of us dont expect much from this season. A transition season. Have to accept it.
I mean just look at the roster. Cant expect much.

He said this at the start of the season that he would play this style. It's a "playoff" style and we got beat last year because we didn't play a playoff style, according to him at least.

Besides, last year proved we can win without Q.

In my opinion the biggest problem is that we lost Q. He would have been able to adjust the style and win in playoffs. The team just continued its thing and Brunette seemed to be a spectator. Now with Maurice the style is totally different but it's not the Florida way. In markets like SE Florida hockey needs to be offense oriented, otherwise fans don't like it. They get used to action and scoring when they watch NBA games and don't appreciate defensive hockey. Of course, the game changes in playoffs but in my opinion it's not acceptable that the team plays boring hockey 82 games in the regular season just to be ready for playoffs.

I agree that the roster isn't as good as it was last season. There is quite a lot scoring skills missing when Hubie, Frankie, Marchment are gone and Duclair injured. It's also much more difficult to turn plays when Ekblad and Weever aren't there. Of course Thatchuk brings something that was missing in that team. Something, however, needs to change to get some comfortable wins. PP must be better and the team needs to attack with more confidence and risk. It's tough with those d-men but still...

The team has played much more away games compared to home games. Therefore I'm not ready for giving my verdict yet but as I mentioned earlier the Florida style should be offensive hockey no matter who is the coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IceManCat

Marco 85

Registered User
Jan 13, 2021
5,126
3,686
When total amateur players like me can see some things that are glaringly wrong with the PP and PK, it really makes me wonder what these total pros do when they practice PP and PK. Like really, w t f.
Good point. It drives me crazy to see who is on the PP and what positions they are in. If our coaching staffs over the last 2 years. Were coaching the Caps.
They would move Ovi over to the right side so he wouldn’t be able to 1 time the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KW

Chaos2k7

2024 Stanley Cup Champions! 🏆
Aug 10, 2003
12,208
11,362
Costa Rica
Since when before last season, was Florida Panthers hockey, firewagon hockey?

Our MO since incepetion has been losing.

Score lots, score little... just win.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BabyBennettov

Dr Beinfest

Registered User
Jun 11, 2012
3,881
2,889
Washington, DC
Since when before last season, was Florida Panthers hockey, firewagon hockey?

Our MO since incepetion has been losing.

Score lots, score little... just win.
And this isn’t about scoring more goals. We’re losing at 2-3x rhw rate of last season. The loss of Weegar and Marchment doesn’t make a 122 pt team a .500 team, and I refuse to believe swapping Huberdeau for otherwise our best player right now with Tkachuck is why we are losing at the rate we are.
 

Felidae

Registered User
Sep 30, 2016
11,875
14,864
Here are my longer term concerns
- PP
- PK
- 4th line (Staal)
- Replacing Hornquist
- Carlson and Kiersted
- Coach’s 2nd/3rd line combos

Here are my NOT longer term concerns
- 5v5
- Bob and Knight
- Barkov, at all
- Reinhart
- Lundell

Here are my question marks
- Bennett
- Balcers
- Cousins
- Coach
Agreed except I'd put Bob as a long term concern.

Fact is, his track record with us is more bad than good. He'll need more than one good year to cancel out 2 seasons of abysmal years of regular and postseason play to the point im not concerned about how he'll play for a full season going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am not exposed

FinlandPanther

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2009
22,234
20,390
Florida
Agreed except I'd put Bob as a long term concern.

Fact is, his track record with us is more bad than good. He'll need more than one good year to cancel out 2 seasons of abysmal years of regular and postseason play to the point im not concerned about how he'll play for a full season going forward.
He’s not very good and hasn’t been his whole time here. If we just wanted adequate goaltending we could ride Spencer and let him learn on the job. He’s getting paid 10 mil to be a difference maker and he’s just isn’t.
 

Dr Beinfest

Registered User
Jun 11, 2012
3,881
2,889
Washington, DC
He’s not very good and hasn’t been his whole time here. If we just wanted adequate goaltending we could ride Spencer and let him learn on the job. He’s getting paid 10 mil to be a difference maker and he’s just isn’t.
This is an awkward situation of “you really can’t blame him for not living up to $10 million.” He isn’t necessarily disappointing so much as “well, Dale, what did you expect?”
 

KW

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 21, 2006
13,318
11,787
This is an awkward situation of “you really can’t blame him for not living up to $10 million.” He isn’t necessarily disappointing so much as “well, Dale, what did you expect?”
The undeniable truth is that Dale Tallon kept this franchise from achieving higher during his time, and eventually set us back as a long term effect. He really screwed up the team. And I don’t want to hear how he picked Barkov (which wasn’t his idea anyway) and a couple of others. Bolland, Yandle, expansion draft, Bob, list goes on… totally f’d us up.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad