Dahlicious
Registered User
I love Kyle Brandt so much.
Also - love getting Bernard locked up. Probably a tad rich on the APY but I bet that's heavily incentivized.
I doubt there are a lot of incentives. It's likely going to look like a slighter cheaper version of the Shakir deal.I love Kyle Brandt so much.
Also - love getting Bernard locked up. Probably a tad rich on the APY but I bet that's heavily incentivized.
Benford could be the toughest one as he is a late day 3 pick and might want to get top of the market money.That re-signing money is starting to get allocated. We had five big names to decide on this off-season:
-Cook
-Rousseau
-Benford
-Bernard
-Shakir
The last two are now locked up. Benford needs to be the top priority next. I just don't see it for Cook at anything above $12x4 right now. Is what it is, running backs are expendable, cornerbacks and the safety valve for your QB on offense and leader of your defense are not.
Makes sense, I guess McGovern should have been on the list, too. He's great.Benford could be the toughest one as he is a late day 3 pick and might want to get top of the market money.
It wouldn't shock me at all if McGovern and Rousseau are the next two extensions they get done. Especially since those two deals free up more 2025 cap space than Benford.
Benford is obviously the best player of the five…and the most important. But he’s also the one they would franchise if need be. His situation isn’t as pressing because paying him top 5 money at his position is more than fine on the tag. So they have more runway with him than the others…because I’m not paying any of them top five at their position. Benford is getting the bag either way.That re-signing money is starting to get allocated. We had five big names to decide on this off-season:
-Cook
-Rousseau
-Benford
-Bernard
-Shakir
The last two are now locked up. Benford needs to be the top priority next. I just don't see it for Cook at anything above $12x4 right now. Is what it is, running backs are expendable, cornerbacks and the safety valve for your QB on offense and leader of your defense are not.
Makes sense, I guess McGovern should have been on the list, too. He's great.
My concern is that we are THIN at CB even with Benford. I know McDermott can coach guys up but our secondary looks like one of, if not the, worst in the league if we don't keep him around long-term.
interesting...hahaView attachment 988877
If this is one of Connor's relatives, I'm guessing he really likes it with the Bills...
Hopefully will benefit from a stronger DL, if that's hopefully in the cardsI'm a little concerned with the Bernard extension. It's going rate for a starting MLB......but I want him to be much more consistent on the mundane plays. Too often he runs himself out of a play or bites on play action. And his splash plays dried up this year.
But if he improves, he'll easily be worth that money if not more.
I enjoyed his Pivot Podcast episode.
Dion is making the rounds today.
I agree, he definitely has to continue to develop for the deal to have value.I'm a little concerned with the Bernard extension. It's going rate for a starting MLB......but I want him to be much more consistent on the mundane plays. Too often he runs himself out of a play or bites on play action. And his splash plays dried up this year.
But if he improves, he'll easily be worth that money if not more.
Dion is making the rounds today.
I’d get it…but I’m not all about it. Just because he’s our best pass rusher doesn’t mean he’s the best we can do.SalC mentions on wgr that he thinks a Rousseau extension is percolating and coming next.