OkimLom
Registered User
- May 3, 2010
- 15,165
- 7,482
As someone in the same industry, yeah, interesting times.
Interesting about Paul. Their LB room feels...incomplete. They have two injury prone LBs, and while Williams has shown flashes at Will, there's nothing much behind Bernard. Plus, they owe Milano nothing after this year, and Bernard nothing after next. A second rounder is probably too big of an investment, but LB is an under the radar target if they end up with a third round pick somehow.
I fully agree LB is not the need that DT/D-line or secondary is, and I support the draft-BPA approach independent of position (trade down if there are too many BPAs available at positions of low-need). My concern is depth in case of injuries. Yes, depth will be available from 31 other camp cuts, and I'm sure they'll have a PS LB this season, but the benefit of drafting and keeping is around learning the Bills system. I don't want to see another Matekevich signed off the couch solution because familiarity with system and teammates is more important than athletic ability. later-round LB is fine usage. Bills LBs are versatile and given the 4-2-5, a critical exposure if a well-below-replacement-level LB is forced into the Bills scheme.Bernard and Williams were "nothing much" after their rookie years and took major steps forward in year 2.
The Bills had two rookie depth LBs last year.
I think they could take a LB this year. I also think they really like Bernard and Williams and would be fine if they were the starting LBs next year.
Barring the board lining up such that there is a "can't pass on this guy" LB, I don't see them taking a LB before day three this year.
I worked as a Controller in US manufacturers for 11 years before finally getting out in 2023. The pressures right now have to be devastating (diminishing demand, no capital investment, completely broken supply chains, drying up of foreign financing, built up inventory in attempts to get in front of this thing...). My heart rate is serously creeping up to unhealthy levels just thinking about it...As someone in the same industry, yeah, interesting times.
Hadn't even considered a LB up until this point, especially with Dorian Williams in the fold, but I still have a hard time thinking of one before the 4th or 5th.Interesting about Paul. Their LB room feels...incomplete. They have two injury prone LBs, and while Williams has shown flashes at Will, there's nothing much behind Bernard. Plus, they owe Milano nothing after this year, and Bernard nothing after next. A second rounder is probably too big of an investment, but LB is an under the radar target if they end up with a third round pick somehow.
STRENGTHS:
● Twitched-up athlete who plays fast and physical
● Takes sharp, decisive angles and doesn't play unsure of himself
● Has range to make plays outside the numbers and logs more steps than everyone else on the field
● Sees through blocks when mirroring laterally to string out runs
● Fierce hands as tackler to finish the mission
● Green-dot defender for the Rebels
● Plays with relentless nature that you feel on each tape
● Quickly reaches depth in zone coverage and returns eyes to the quarterback
● Explosive blitzer who races through gaps before blocking scheme can react
WEAKNESSES:
● Lacks ideal length, mass and growth potential (not built to play in a phone booth)
● Shorter arms limit his take-on ability and leaves him engulfed by offensive linemen (and some tight ends)
● Doesn't always see blocks in peripherals
● Frenetic pace leaves him vulnerable to cutbacks
● Average drive-through power as tackler, which leaves him hugging/pulling to finish
● Gets to landmarks in coverage but needs to develop route anticipation to be more of a playmaker versus pass
SUMMARY: A one-year starter at Ole Miss, Paul played the "Mike" linebacker role in defensive coordinator Pete Golding's 4-2-5 base scheme. Though he was productive in his first three seasons at Arkansas, he played his best ball after transferring to Ole Miss — led the team in tackles in
2024 and benefitted from playing behind a defensive line full of future pros. A highly active, run-around linebacker, Paul is an easy linebacker to appreciate, because of his play speed, execution and competitive toughness (he always had the dirtiest jersey on each tape studied). His lack of inches stands out, but he doesn't try to be something he's not and compensates for his lack of take-on length by eluding blockers or attacking full-speed into contact. Overall, Paul won't be a fit for NFL teams that have strict size thresholds at the position, but his "all-out" play style will find a way to be productive at the next level. He should shine on special teams.
GRADE: 3rd-4th round
Regardless of what they do in the draft, they are going to keep 6 LBs on the 53, most likely.I fully agree LB is not the need that DT/D-line or secondary is, and I support the draft-BPA approach independent of position (trade down if there are too many BPAs available at positions of low-need). My concern is depth in case of injuries. Yes, depth will be available from 31 other camp cuts, and I'm sure they'll have a PS LB this season, but the benefit of drafting and keeping is around learning the Bills system. I don't want to see another Matekevich signed off the couch solution because familiarity with system and teammates is more important than athletic ability. later-round LB is fine usage. Bills LBs are versatile and given the 4-2-5, a critical exposure if a well-below-replacement-level LB is forced into the Bills scheme.
Fair point. But the purpose of the post was not to make picks but to show the process I'm advocating for.I wouldn't want the Bills to draft Bond.
Someone I trust told me that not only does he have this warrant for DV, he has multiple women that have gotten orders of protection against him.
Hard pass.
Fair point. But the purpose of the post was not to make picks but to show the process I'm advocating for.
I imagine it went something likeYeah I was intrigued on Bond until now.
I wonder what the talks have been with Cooks team. Is it all quiet? Is he expected to hit the ground running at camp and all parties know it's time to play out the year? Did they give him permission or are they quietly looking at a trade to a team that will pay him off?
I imagine it went something like
Cook: I want 15 mil, I led the league in td's
Beane: Pick up a free runner on 3rd down ...?
*Awkward stare*
Beane: so talk in the off season?
from what Beane said it sounds like they wanted to sign him to a new deal but they just weren’t on the same page as far as AAV (Cook wants $15M/yr), so Beane said they moved onto contract discussions with players they could get deals done with.@Selanne00008
Beane publicly stated Bills have moved on from contract discussions with current players and UFAs and are draft focused.
I read that as a public way of saying Cook and team need to grow up take a seat and wait their turn even if it means 10 more months until next March.
Pretty good mock draft and discussion on draft favorites:
They used a draft simulator that I hadn't used yet:
Highly recommended, mostly because it felt tough to get the guys I wanted. Felt like the most realistic simulator I've used so far.
Pretty good mock draft and discussion on draft favorites:
They used a draft simulator that I hadn't used yet:
Highly recommended, mostly because it felt tough to get the guys I wanted. Felt like the most realistic simulator I've used so far.
Pretty good mock draft and discussion on draft favorites:
They used a draft simulator that I hadn't used yet:
Highly recommended, mostly because it felt tough to get the guys I wanted. Felt like the most realistic simulator I've used so far.
I’d get used to that. Copycat league. Everybody wants to be the Eagles.I'm very annoyed because there is always a run on DTs in 20s leaving me with no good options at 30 lol
Thanks for sharing, there goes my weekend.They used a draft simulator that I hadn't used yet:
Highly recommended, mostly because it felt tough to get the guys I wanted. Felt like the most realistic simulator I've used so far.