"a better finisher than playmaker, he is not at his best when handling the puck"
"he shows an interest and applies himself on the backcheck only when the puck is in his sights"
"his intensity wanes when the puck is not on his stick and he can be down right lazy at times"
"his offensive game is solid however, his lack of physical involvement cripples the type of game that is necessary to thrive at the NHL level"
Others were right what I have seen in those 10+ games this season, but these aren't.
1)He is very good playmaker as well, I would compare him to Malkin(not talent wise, but playingwise) guy who can shoot well, but do makes some really nice passes time to time. And he is good with puck.
2)He does backcheck at least with quite nice intensity. Maybe it's a part true that he could do it better when puck is longer from him.
3)Surely not true, he is makin a lot effort without puck as well. Moving with speed to create space.
4)He does use his (small) body well and use it and can be physical, but obviously his lack of size&muscle are hindering his play.
Then again if it's the same scouting company which rated Nättinen over Rajala, then I'm not surprised about that kind of mistakes.
Have to see Pulkkinen more to compare Rajala&Pulkkinen, but had to correct those obvious flaws.
edit:Have to say what I have seen Rajala is one of those who are always giving team mates extra pads and trying to root them for better plays. Yes, he might be sometimes be selfish with the puck, but same you could say about allmost every top player in the world(Kovalchuk, Ovechkin, Malkin, Iginla, etcetc).