salbutera
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2019
- 15,890
- 18,191
In particular for Mesar a lot of people keep saying he's still one of the best but his team fell off, but none of the other big guns numbers fell off at all.
In particular for Mesar a lot of people keep saying he's still one of the best but his team fell off, but none of the other big guns numbers fell off at all.
That’s what I figured (have not looked it up for a few days). I’ll start reading prospect lists and watching vids then, assuming odds are teams also don’t move much in the lottery either. Lazy prospect hobbyist lol.
edit - craps, this dude on Sportsnet has a bunch of D up there in those spots… I’ll find lists where a giant right winger that looks like Slaf’s mirrored image is available at 6 and use my confirmation bias to validate it before being obstinate on here so I feel I belong.
Scout's Analysis: Ranking the top 40 prospects for the 2024 NHL Draft
Back with his second rankings for the 2024 NHL Draft, scout Jason Bukala expands his list to 40 names, with one very familiar still at the top.www.sportsnet.ca
Scroll up.Take the time to read the comment you are trying to defend lol. The best != in the conversation
How dare you find pleasure in the moment-to-moment activity of watching hockey. You’re so entitled.I'm a huge tanker, but you missed a really good hockey game last night. This was one of those really good 2-1 games. Not sure if you remember the 2-1 win we had over the Leafs where Kovalchuk scored the OT winner off of a rebound of a Suzuki breakaway, but it was sort of like that.
One of the things that made this game so exciting was how skilled and good the Avs were. They probably had more chances than us on the night. But there were many points when they'd dominate and pass the puck around like the Harlem Globtrotters and generate so many chances, only to be stoned by Montembault. But then we'd come back and have like 4 or 5 shifts in a row where each line was either keeping the puck deep and cycling to get chances or getting grade A chances on the counter attack. It was incredible hockey and our players had incredible fight, mixed with nice plays to create scoring chances, all while watching Makar, McKinnon, Rantenen and their crew was like watching the Globetrotters. It would have been nice if there were playoff implications on the line like the Toronto game I referenced. But from a pure hockey standpoint, it was a good one, imo.
Do we see the habs trading down? Hard to imagine trading for 1oa.The 2024 draft could be similar to the 2012 draft. I could see 5 D drafted in the top 10.
Think about that...they have a great deal of talent on D and up front yet they are so mired in a losing culture that is doesn't matter.Day 169 since the season started of waiting for Ottawa to pass us in the standings....
I'd think Catton will fall due to his size.It'll be 6 d men in the top 10.
All of Levshunov, Dickinson, Silayev, Yakemchuk, Buium and Parekh are going top 10.
I'd think Catton will fall due to his size.
Who do you think the top 4 forwards will be:
Celebrini, Demidov, Lindstrom, and Eiserman?
Eiserman sounds like a 6 foot Cole Caufield. But many goal scorers are streaky, like Brock Boeser in Vancouver.
Not a chance…How dare you find pleasure in the moment-to-moment activity of watching hockey. You’re so entitled.
Do we see the habs trading down? Hard to imagine trading for 1oa.
you go for bpa and that’s your asset even if redundant? I mean it makes sense even as a future trade chip; a lot of people really diss drafting for need… say a lhd is next bpa on your list…Not a chance…
So we are likely getting one of those first 8…..ready to live with that!!Top 4 defenseman will be Dickinson, Levshunov, Silayev and Yakemchuk.
Top 4 forwards are Celebrini, Demidov, Lindstrom, and I'd put Catton at 4, but I don't think there's a consenus on that, some people have Helenius or Eiserman ahead of him.
Then you draft the LHD….I’d imagine at 6-7-8 Yakemchuk, Eiserman and Catton are all available….be hard to turn your back at the Yak given those options.you go for bpa and that’s your asset even if redundant? I mean it makes sense even as a future trade chip; a lot of people really diss drafting for need… say a lhd is next bpa on your list…
Then you draft the LHD….I’d imagine at 6-7-8 Yakemchuk, Eiserman and Catton are all available….be hard to turn your back at the Yak given those options.
I wasn't asking who they will be. That's hard to predict. Did you have the Russian D going 6th to Arizona last year?Top 4 defenseman will be Dickinson, Levshunov, Silayev and Yakemchuk.
Top 4 forwards are Celebrini, Demidov, Lindstrom, and I'd put Catton at 4, but I don't think there's a consenus on that, some people have Helenius or Eiserman ahead of him.
Simply responding to you. Clearly you didn't read the chain of replies.Why? What are you trying to argue about?
I wasn't asking who they will be. That's hard to predict. Did you have the Russian D going 6th to Arizona last year?
I was asking who you have top 4 for forwards for us to draft, based on your viewing.
It'll be 6 d men in the top 10.
All of Levshunov, Dickinson, Silayev, Yakemchuk, Buium and Parekh are going top 10.
Just have to hope that 5 of them are not pick from 6 to 10
Then you draft the LHD….I’d imagine at 6-7-8 Yakemchuk, Eiserman and Catton are all available….be hard to turn your back at the Yak given those options.
Imagine a RHD consisting of Mailloux, Reinbacher and Yak….mon dieu that’s NASTY!!!
I would happily turn my back on Yak and laugh all the way to the bank with Catton in the systemThen you draft the LHD….I’d imagine at 6-7-8 Yakemchuk, Eiserman and Catton are all available….be hard to turn your back at the Yak given those options.
Imagine a RHD consisting of Mailloux, Reinbacher and Yak….mon dieu that’s NASTY!!!