Empoleon8771
Registered User
The way it reads to me is that you're not debating Matthews, you're debating McDavid because of Sid. That's what it reads to me and I wager for everyone else too.
If I was solely debating McDavid because of Sid, I wouldn't be bringing Matthews into it
It is partially that, but it's also criticizing an argument I've been having a lot on here with people saying guys aren't good because they haven't done it for long enough yet.
They shouldn't be held to the same standard. 69 points should not be enough to warrant you a spot as a #4 center, even if 40 of them are goals.
But 100 point season, Hart and Art Ross is enough to make a fair argument for #1 centre.
I guess my complaint was people I was reading were focusing more on Matthews only having 1 season more than they were focusing on how laughable his credentials are for being ranked the #4 center in hockey right now.