Section 104
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2021
- 768
- 814
Back in the 1970s a columnist for the Sporting News, Leonard Koppett, wrote an interesting column of what legalized gambling would do. He noted that around 1910 a horse named Dan Patch was one of the biggest celebrities in America. His feats on the track were celebrated. But over the years as gambling became legal on horse racing, and virtually no where else, things changed so that by the mid 1970s the emphasis on the evening new sports report was how much the daily double paid.
Could it be in a few years that’s all we hear about a sporting event…what wagers paid and not the final score?
Phil Mushnick, grumpy old man for the New York Post, noted these ads really emphasize a trifecta…for example McDavid gets at least two points, Draistl gets a goal and Nashville scores 3 or more; Hard to hit all three but they will push these instead of something simple Oilers 40 or more shots on goal? Apparently a lot of these companies will start restricting how much you can bet if you actually are good at picking winners.
Could it be in a few years that’s all we hear about a sporting event…what wagers paid and not the final score?
Phil Mushnick, grumpy old man for the New York Post, noted these ads really emphasize a trifecta…for example McDavid gets at least two points, Draistl gets a goal and Nashville scores 3 or more; Hard to hit all three but they will push these instead of something simple Oilers 40 or more shots on goal? Apparently a lot of these companies will start restricting how much you can bet if you actually are good at picking winners.