We all know where the term "Joy Division" comes from, no?
Winner!!
I was never a fan of Joy Division or New Order, though I didn't dislike either.
We all know where the term "Joy Division" comes from, no?
Anyone here a fan of groove metal? During the Metallica two-day concert at the beginning of the month, Pantera and Five Finger Death Punch were openers (different nights), and since then, I've just let my FFDP playlist run through and let Apple Music go from there. I had never really investigated that genre of music before, but have since discovered how much I really like harder metal bands like Godsmack, Slipknot, Korn, Stone Sour, All That Remains, etc. For other fans, what are some other bands I should spend more listening time on?
Best cover of all time.
Totally. While Elvis cover has a sexual tone, the Clash one is more violent. Maybe that's their point?
Speaking of The Clash...
An album as important and critically acclaimed as much as it was divisive with the band in question's original fan base. London Calling was The Clash's point of initial sonic separation from punk and becoming more of a pop rock band. While pop rock has had its fingers in the DNA of punk, the sound of The Clash on London Calling was a massive departure from their initial harder edged sound that was showcased front and center on their first two albums. Whether that was the upgraded level of production quality smoothing out the sound to the point it was taking off too much of the sonic edge that The Clash had, The Clash experimenting too much they deviated naturally away from the likes of The Ramones and Sex Pistols, the shifting nature of the music scene The Clash were in, or just the natural byproduct of crossing over into the mainstream is too hard to pinpoint at least from my perspective. What can be said is that the album is very good and was a happy mix between punk and the initial flirting the band had with genres of music like reggae, ska, jazz, and rockabilly among others. And while I like The Clash's music efforts after this, there's something the band's later output is missing in my opinion.
Speaking of The Clash...
An album as important and critically acclaimed as much as it was divisive with the band in question's original fan base. London Calling was The Clash's point of initial sonic separation from punk and becoming more of a pop rock band. While pop rock has had its fingers in the DNA of punk, the sound of The Clash on London Calling was a massive departure from their initial harder edged sound that was showcased front and center on their first two albums. Whether that was the upgraded level of production quality smoothing out the sound to the point it was taking off too much of the sonic edge that The Clash had, The Clash experimenting too much they deviated naturally away from the likes of The Ramones and Sex Pistols, the shifting nature of the music scene The Clash were in, or just the natural byproduct of crossing over into the mainstream is too hard to pinpoint at least from my perspective. What can be said is that the album is very good and was a happy mix between punk and the initial flirting the band had with genres of music like reggae, ska, jazz, and rockabilly among others. And while I like The Clash's music efforts after this, there's something the band's later output is missing in my opinion.
I've heard it said that they slowed down enough to learn how to actually play their instruments. Which is funny, but ignores the fact that they were pretty good musicians (for punks) before they formed The Clash. I mean, Joe was in a frigging rockabilly group, and none of them taught themselves to play in 2 weeks using Stooges albums and amphetamines ala Steve Jones.
Yep. I also know what the "31G" stands for in the song Warsaw.
Totally. While Elvis cover has a sexual tone, the Clash one is more violent. Maybe that's their point?
I forget the exact quote "Good artists copy, great artists steal". Something like that.
Just my take.
I Iike Dark Side of the Moon and Shakedown Street too.
Mediocrity borrows.
Genius steals.
Speaking of "Dark Side of the Moon," anyone up on jolly Roger Waters these days?
What a guy!
View attachment 747726
He's always been that guy, he just hid it well before. Tough to imagine how a guy who is that obsessed with his father's death in the war against Nazis and Fascists could be such a virulent anti-semite. Weird how the mind works.