Mr Hockey
Toronto
- May 11, 2017
- 11,156
- 3,662
Well, I certainly hope not. I have no complaints at all about Matthews if it isn't a birthright for him to earn 12-13 mil per. McDavid scored 100 points and won a hart trophy before being offered such a contract.is he?
Well, I certainly hope not. I have no complaints at all about Matthews if it isn't a birthright for him to earn 12-13 mil per. McDavid scored 100 points and won a hart trophy before being offered such a contract.
This is completely true even though he gets more goals from in and around the netI feel like if auston doesn't get a couple of those Buffalo OT goal shots off a game, he's considered to have had a bad game / been invisible.
I'd be content with some solid stickhandling, a few shots on goal, some forechecking and possession in the offensive zone, no major turnover and no injury
Even with Matthews playing about half of what he's capable of since that Kronwall boarding, he is still in 6th overall in PPG. Now just one point shy of 40 points at the half way mark, that's still pace for 98 points (in only 68 games).
Matthews is basically tied with Ovechkin for number 1 in the league in Goals per game and is on pace for 50 in 68 games. And yes, he is still not playing up to his potential these days like he was before that Trouba hit (16 goals in 10 games).
It's about defense, not offense.
Matthews is just not that good without the puck.
He's still a young center. He still does not know what to do in every situation. That cost the team the last game.
If he can't do it, and nothing so far indicates Matthews can play good defense on a consistent basis, you have no choice but to put Hyman with Matthews. They could do Brown with Matthews, but Nylander and Johnsson with Matthews, that is no good. Two or three years from now, that could be real good, but now, it's not.
He never had 16 in 10. He had 10 in 6 then still had 10 in 11 after injury (10 and a period to be exact). He had 16 points if that's what you mean.
That's not particularly true either. All star players take a few shifts off each game including Marner and Tavares. We all see our favs in different lights. They all have bad giveaways, lazy backchecks and missed assignments at times.
This isn't true this season though, Marner has far less giveaways and consistently creates more and defends better nearly every game. Tavares competes more but gives the puck away and tries to deke standing still way too much. I have defended that Matthews has been our best player before this season, I don't have any favourites and that post you quoted is true.
So what? He's a 13 million dollar player.
.Even with Matthews playing about half of what he's capable of since that Kronwall boarding, he is still in 6th overall in PPG. Now just one point shy of 40 points at the half way mark, that's still pace for 98 points (in only 68 games).
If he goes for top dollar, he hurts the team by taking cap space. You're better off keeping him and sacrificing elsewhere, but it still hurts.
But by "hurt", you actually mean "lose some of the ability to pay a player who isn't as good as Auston Matthews".
I don't mind paying a top player in the game top dollar. That's how it should be.
People still have to get used to the concept of 8 figure salaries for the top stars in hockey, I think. The cap isn't 60 million anymore.