HabzSauce
Registered User
- Jun 10, 2022
- 1,465
- 3,711
Really depends. For a developing team, I would probably rather the motivator. But at some point you need the incredible strategist. Motivation alone can only take you so far. In the playoffs where margin for error is so small & games are so tight, we're gonna need those X's and O's & attention to detail in all aspects to give us best chance at winning. Like Knoblouch last year for example. That dude looks lifeless but he ran a beautiful system last playoffs with the Oilers. They were phenomenal defensively because of his structure & looked really solid overall against elite teams in VAN, DAL & FLA. Motivation was still there because they had a system that worked & were winning games. Didn't need to be a motivational speaker to fire them up.This has been repeated ad nauseum since his interim days. You've flipped the narrative, but the question should be reversed towards people like you. Why do you presume that he'll be only good at development? It's the same old sauce. It's an assumption with zero basis. Something that is promulgated as a foregone conclusion, yet the team has a system and he adapts in-game or else we wouldn't be one of the better 3rd period teams in the 2nd half.
Also, better to have a hell of a motivator than an incredible strategist in hockey. X's and O's doesn't make players hustle and be first on the puck. That's motivation.
When it comes to Marty, I never said it was a forgone conclusion he couldn't get the job done with a contender. I'd just rather someone that's more battle tested & proven vs a coach that went straight from pewee to the NHL. Marty is still developing. A guy like Montgomery would have been perfect.