The Loss of Broberg and Holloway Gripe Thread

[TB12]

They can coach defense, but they better not f***ing complain come May/June that no one but three players is scoring if they're in tight against a team that has a strong goalie like in a series against Vegas or Winnipeg or Florida (we lost all three series' last time we played all three of these teams in large part because their goaltending was outstanding and we really needed additional goals).

Because they put in zero effort as a staff to get anyone else going this year other than maybe Podkolzin and tried nothing different thus far this regular season.

If Knob isn't going to use these players then next time say f***ing something on July 1 Knob. This isn't how a championship caliber team conducts itself.

Did Florida whine and cry about less than perfect players like Reinhart and Montour and OEL? No. They maximized their abilities and properly integrated them into the group and have a Cup to show for it.

Sam Reinhart was -28 in 54 games with the Sabres before going to Florida, did their coaching staff cry about that? No, they found ways to utilize his talents properly.

You are inventing narratives and then getting mad about them. And you keep repeating the same exact thing over and over again. You always do this and it's rather annoying.

Puljujarvi had seasons of 12, 14 and 15 (right before you announced to the board that he was going to ‘outscore RNH and Hyman’ ). Yamamoto had 20. Holloway had put up 9 goals across 89 regular season games. He got the contract offer he deserved.

What a lot of the jilted boyfriends on this board can’t seem to get through their heads is that Dylan Holloway tried to jump his place in the queue. He took a pen out of his pocket and signed a document that was a big fat f*** you to the team that drafted and developed him and gave him his shot in this league. He did it because he couldn’t bear to wait one more season to make that extra million dollars he felt he was entitled to. And he did it in a critical SC window season and under circumstances that he knew full well were critical for the team. Keep cheering for a guy like that I guess …

This. Really well said. A lot of guys on here still cry about their ex gf's from high school I bet.

 

[Duke74]

I think the issue is that this team gambled on a player they werent familiar with (Skinner) instead of running with a player they were not only familiar with but they had an investment in with Holloway.
This team seems to do this a lot...investing in a player and developing the player only to trade that player away just before that player adjusts to the NHL.
Its very poor assest management.

In terms of their Stanley Cup aspirations....a contending team needs a couple of young players in the middle 6...especially if they have the grit and speed like Holloway has.
Its really hard to justify why this team made the decision to sign Skinner at $3M and let Holloway walk.
Both are clear mistakes.

I agree that the whole Skinner thing isn't working out. He reminds me in so many ways of Eberle, a player that we jettisoned years ago. I think he's being misused on the fourth line, which is obviously contributing to his struggles. Seems like there's a disconnect between management and coaching on this one.

Holloway even at 2.3 million is realms better than Skinner at his higher price tag. I'm just trying to understand management's mindset. I have no idea what transpired behind the scenes, but I'm wondering if they worried that they had already overpaid young guys in the past, and quite honestly, what Holloway accepted from St.Louis was an overpay based on historical production. Of course, the gamble worked out for the Blues, leaving us with egg on our faces.

 

[McDNicks17]

I think the issue is that this team gambled on a player they werent familiar with (Skinner) instead of running with a player they were not only familiar with but they had an investment in with Holloway.
This team seems to do this a lot...investing in a player and developing the player only to trade that player away just before that player adjusts to the NHL.
Its very poor assest management.

In terms of their Stanley Cup aspirations....a contending team needs a couple of young players in the middle 6...especially if they have the grit and speed like Holloway has.
Its really hard to justify why this team made the decision to sign Skinner at $3M and let Holloway walk.
Both are clear mistakes.

I don't think the plan was one or the other. Ideally Holloway would have been in Pod's spot at $1.5M or something, but unlike 99% of RFAs, he chose to chase money.

And I'm not even sure if he's going to come out ahead moneywise. It's starting to look like he took terrible advice from a rookie agent who kind of got swept up into being used by a much more seasoned agent. If Holloway drops ~25 goals, he's going to be super underpaid next year at $2.2M. Signing the 1 year/$1.5M or whatever it was that was offered might have been the way to go, but he chose(or was convinced by an awful agent) to not bet on himself when it came to competition in the lineup or taking a one year deal(apparently term was the biggest sticking point between the Oilers and Holloway's camp).

The Oilers likely wouldn't be able to afford him next offseason, but he'd be looking at a big extension somewhere else instead of being locked into a $2.2M deal on a bottom feeder.

 

[KCC]

You people are still going on about these players? Get over it. lol.

 

[Sheikyerbouti]

Signing the 1 year/$1.5M or whatever it was that was offered

2X1 million and a 4rth line role, which is insulting

I was angry at Holloway and his agent as well, felt he left over 500k, but that wasn't the case if you believe Holloway. The Blues offered over double the Oilers, which looks like a value contract now, so our evaluation of the player, and the market, was the issue, not Holloway or his agent

You people are still going on about these players? Get over it. lol.

never!

 

[McDNicks17]

2X1 million, which is insulting after he played top six in the finals.

I was angry at Holloway and his agent as well, felt he left over 500k, but that wasn't the case if you believe Holloway. The Blues offered over double the Oilers, which looks like a value contract now, so our evaluation of the player, and the market, was the issue, not Holloway or his agent

Holloway himself mentioned the one year deal and lack of budging on term, so I tend to not believe those other numbers that were thrown out there by the STL beat writer.

 

[DavidHasselhoffsFist]

You people are still going on about these players? Get over it. lol.

 

[guymez]

I don't think the plan was one or the other. Ideally Holloway would have been in Pod's spot at $1.5M or something, but unlike 99% of RFAs, he chose to chase money.

And I'm not even sure if he's going to come out ahead moneywise. It's starting to look like he took terrible advice from a rookie agent who kind of got swept up into being used by a much more seasoned agent. If Holloway drops ~25 goals, he's going to be super underpaid next year at $2.2M. Signing the 1 year/$1.5M or whatever it was that was offered might have been the way to go, but he chose(or was convinced by an awful agent) to not bet on himself when it came to competition in the lineup or taking a one year deal(apparently term was the biggest sticking point between the Oilers and Holloway's camp).

The Oilers likely wouldn't be able to afford him next offseason, but he'd be looking at a big extension somewhere else instead of being locked into a $2.2M deal on a bottom feeder.

Its virtually impossible to know what really happened in the background but there has been a trend of this team investing in players and then letting those players go at the wrong time.
I'm just tired of it.

 

[oobga]

You people are still going on about these players? Get over it. lol.

 

[guymez]

I agree that the whole Skinner thing isn't working out. He reminds me in so many ways of Eberle, a player that we jettisoned years ago. I think he's being misused on the fourth line, which is obviously contributing to his struggles. Seems like there's a disconnect between management and coaching on this one.

Holloway even at 2.3 million is realms better than Skinner at his higher price tag. I'm just trying to understand management's mindset. I have no idea what transpired behind the scenes, but I'm wondering if they worried that they had already overpaid young guys in the past, and quite honestly, what Holloway accepted from St.Louis was an overpay based on historical production. Of course, the gamble worked out for the Blues, leaving us with egg on our faces.

I have to admit...I dont get some of what Knoblauch does at all. Probably a large part of why I'm on here posting instead of coaching somewhere meaningful.

In terms of Skinner though I do get it. I mean who do you replace in the top 6 and does having Skinner there actually make the team better?
I just dont see it.

So I think that you are right on the mark with the bolded. What justification could Management possibly have for signing this player?