The Los Angeles Kings - For Real or a Mirage?

Ghetty Green

Registered User
Apr 7, 2018
1,496
1,720
It’s temporary but it has been surprising where they are in the standings without Doughty and their 99 goalie problems. It’s inevitable that they’ll crash back down. They are on a 6 game winning streak and the GDTs are barely active because us kings fans know what’s to come.
The GDT being less active has more to do with the low quality posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Docgonzo

Statto

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 9, 2014
5,717
8,082
It’s temporary but it has been surprising where they are in the standings without Doughty and their 99 goalie problems. It’s inevitable that they’ll crash back down. They are on a 6 game winning streak and the GDTs are barely active because us kings fans know what’s to come.
That’s because everyone likes to complain and there is not much to complain about. Normally the GDT is just a bitchfest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Docgonzo

MessierII

Registered User
Aug 10, 2011
28,780
18,341
Kings are good. They are one of the best defensive teams in the league and have been for years. People discount them because they face the oilers every year. If they played anyone else round 1 they probably win. Frustrating team to face.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghetty Green

BaileyFan

Registered User
Jun 14, 2023
704
1,421
Kings are good. They are one of the best defensive teams in the league and have been for years. People discount them because they face the oilers every year. If they played anyone else round 1 they probably win. Frustrating team to face.
This sounds like the exact sort of thing that Blake and Luc tell each other in the front office to convince themselves to do stuff like pull the plug on a rebuild after 2 years and trade promising young players and futures for the likes of Fiala and Dubois. This is the sort of talk that leads to both of them somehow not getting fired after one of the most fireable seasons in recent memory.

The Oilers were immediately buried by the first good contender they played in 22 and 23. No Kings fan at this point is delusional enough to think we would’ve done any better against any of those teams.
 

kingsholygrail

17-8-3 We're back. It's over.
Sponsor
Dec 21, 2006
82,973
17,505
Derpifornia
Easy to feel good about them in the middle of a winning streak, but they have been lights out at home this year and middling on the road. The current road trip is a good test. They play the Devils tomorrow.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,842
16,827
Vancouver
This sounds like the exact sort of thing that Blake and Luc tell each other in the front office to convince themselves to do stuff like pull the plug on a rebuild after 2 years and trade promising young players and futures for the likes of Fiala and Dubois. This is the sort of talk that leads to both of them somehow not getting fired after one of the most fireable seasons in recent memory.

The Oilers were immediately buried by the first good contender they played in 22 and 23. No Kings fan at this point is delusional enough to think we would’ve done any better against any of those teams.

I guess it depends on what constitutes good. Kings are definitely a good team and have been a 100 point team for awhile now, but I don’t think they have the horses to be a real contender.
 

Soul Assumption

Registered User
Jul 18, 2022
370
428
It also means that they are full of young players that are just now making a name for themselves as opposed to old geezers whom people expect to be good like Nashville, Pittsburgh, Boston, or Rangers are experiencing. Washington is very similar story in the East in that regard.
"full of young players" sounds like an exaggeration, they have maybe 4-5 young players and only 2 of them are high picks and one of those players (Byfield) doesn't look good
 

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
8,019
12,271
The way Kings fans talk about their team, I always expect them to be at the bottom of the standings.
Nobody thinks they are a bad team, we are upset that Blake blew the possibility of really turning the franchise around via a rebuild in favor of quick fixes to get the ancient Cup core another run. It clearly wasn't going to work, and it cost Vilardi, Faber and a couple of what would have been high 1st round picks.

They traded potential to cement mediocrity, and everyone saw it coming except for management.
 

SoundAndFury

Registered User
May 28, 2012
12,011
6,043
"full of young players" sounds like an exaggeration, they have maybe 4-5 young players and only 2 of them are high picks and one of those players (Byfield) doesn't look good
Again, same applies to Washington. You can make a point Ovechkin is still their best F, Carlson still their best D but young blood energizes the lineup, it doesn't have to be all Stutzles and Bedards.

Now, down to numbers, Anderson, Clarke, Spence, Byfield, and Laferriere (who is 3rd on the team in scoring, high pick or not) are all 25 or less. Maybe you could add Turcotte to that list as well. In which case it would make it 3 high picks although again, not sure if that's relevant.

Out of the impact skaters, only Kopitar and Dannault are over 30. Now "full of young players" might have been and overstatement but the team basically doesn't have big names that are past their prime unlike so many other struggling team people expected to be better.
 
Last edited:

SoundAndFury

Registered User
May 28, 2012
12,011
6,043
They don't have any big names at all, that's the point. You call Rangers old but they also have a bunch of young players: Miller, Cuylle, Chytil, Lafreniere, Kakko
5 out of 6 guys in the Rangers top-6 tonight are 31 or older. Why are you acting like it's so hard to understand what I am saying?

Yes, they don't have big names who are overpaid because they have been this and that at some point of their career (well they have one but he isn't playing this season). That's exactly the point I'm making. If you look at the other "surprise" teams across the league (Washington, Minnesota) that's the thing they share. And overpaid veterans is the thing teams that people are surprised to see struggling the most share.
 

Soul Assumption

Registered User
Jul 18, 2022
370
428
Yes, they don't have big names who are overpaid because they have been this and that at some point of their career (well they have one but he isn't playing this season). That's exactly the point I'm making. If you look at the other "surprise" teams across the league (Washington, Minnesota) that's the thing they share. And overpaid veterans is the thing teams that people are surprised to see struggling the most share.
ok bro i think all these teams (LA, Minnesota, Washington) are well coached with a good defensive structure but they overachieved and are not a threat in the playoffs because you can't win a cup when your best player is Kopitar or Ovechkin because it isn't 2012 or even 2018
 

SoundAndFury

Registered User
May 28, 2012
12,011
6,043
ok bro i think all these teams (LA, Minnesota, Washington) are well coached with a good defensive structure but they overachieved and are not a threat in the playoffs because you can't win a cup when your best player is Kopitar or Ovechkin because it isn't 2012 or even 2018
I don't believe they are a threat to win the Cup either but stop moving the goalposts. This whole discussion of ours was prompted by you saying "they are barely a playoff team". Now you are talking about winning the Cup.
 

HockeyWooot

Registered User
Jan 28, 2020
2,627
2,280
They’ve been a good team for a while that shouldn’t be in dispute, losing 3 years in a row to an Oilers group that would get within a game of winning the cup seems to have skewed perception.

Whether they are able to take another step forward or not, is a completely different question. Doesn’t change the fact they are a good team.
 

Soul Assumption

Registered User
Jul 18, 2022
370
428
I don't believe they are a threat to win the Cup either but stop moving the goalposts. This whole discussion of ours was prompted by you saying "they are barely a playoff team". Now you are talking about winning the Cup.
Because they are all barely playoff teams on paper and everyone thought they would be barely playoff teams. Minnesota missed the playoffs last season, Washington is the 2nd WC, LA is a little better but still a mediocre team, and now you act like their performance is not overachieving and you totally expected it.
 

Trash Panda

Registered User
May 12, 2021
2,386
4,332
Nobody thinks they are a bad team, we are upset that Blake blew the possibility of really turning the franchise around via a rebuild in favor of quick fixes to get the ancient Cup core another run. It clearly wasn't going to work, and it cost Vilardi, Faber and a couple of what would have been high 1st round picks.

They traded potential to cement mediocrity, and everyone saw it coming except for management.
This isn’t a response that is going to resonate with the main board, but it’s absolutely correct.

Could have been great, but instead it’s turned into assured “good but not good enough”
 

Paper

Registered User
Nov 4, 2009
4,682
2,296
The fact the title of this thread isn't "The Los Angeles Kings - For real or Pretenders" should get the OP banned.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad