I appreciated that his performance had the right amount of restraint where a less nuanced actor might have spent the whole episode over acting and yelling. His visual cues and tone of voice indicated a lot of things. In the first third, you can see the growing unease. The almost desperate desire to not just save Ellie from the danger of the world, but from the hidden hurt her experiences have already caused and could continue to cause her. And then through every line of dialogue before and after the rampage, you know that Joel is aware that what he did was monstrous and selfish, but he's so desperate to protect someone he loves that he looks at it like he has no choice. You can pick that up through context just fine, but I thought Pascal imbued that in his performance really well. Best part of a somewhat disappointing finale.Pedro Pascal deserves all of the awards. I knew the ending from a friend playing the game years ago, but man it still hit me hard. Back then I thought it was extremely stupid but now you can understand why he made that choice as selfish as it might be.
The fact is that neither Marlene nor Joel gave Ellie a choice. That's part of the point. Both were too afraid of what Ellie's answer might be to give her agency in that moment. You can argue that Marlene could have forced her if she didn't like the answer, but they added the intro to build on the relationship between Marlene and Ellie's mom for a reason. Marlene was having a tough time making that call, and didn't want to add anything to make it potentially even harder.First, she might've avoided everything if she'd just asked Ellie to submit to the surgery, which she probably would've, since she came all that way and wanted to help.
That's also intentional. It a stronger point to make in the game than it is on TV, as it forces you, the player, to actually take agency in that situation and participate in the killing. The moment with the surgeon it will literally sit there indefinitely until you kill him. But Joel is very much not supposed to be a flawless protagonist, and the decision he makes here is at the core of both the game and show's message. It's about the lengths a parent will go thru to protect their child, and asking each of us what we would be willing to sacrifice to protect ours. Joel was willing to sacrifice a cure for humanity and the lives of even the unarmed and defenseless (let alone killing plenty of others).Finally, Joel shooting unarmed and incapacitated people (including even a surgeon) in the head and lying to Ellie afterwards (after all they'd been through) soured me a little on Joel and put a damper on the episode and season.
Joel did give Ellie a choice. He offered to take her back to Tommy and she turned it down because they'd come so far and she didn't want it to be for nothing.The fact is that neither Marlene nor Joel gave Ellie a choice. That's part of the point. Both were too afraid of what Ellie's answer might be to give her agency in that moment. You can argue that Marlene could have forced her if she didn't like the answer, but they added the intro to build on the relationship between Marlene and Ellie's mom for a reason. Marlene was having a tough time making that call, and didn't want to add anything to make it potentially even harder.
That was my point, that it seemed so intentional that it felt contrived. I guessed as much that it worked better in the game because the point of view was different.That's also intentional. It a stronger point to make in the game than it is on TV, as it forces you, the player, to actually take agency in that situation and participate in the killing. The moment with the surgeon it will literally sit there indefinitely until you kill him. But Joel is very much not supposed to be a flawless protagonist, and the decision he makes here is at the core of both the game and show's message. It's about the lengths a parent will go thru to protect their child, and asking each of us what we would be willing to sacrifice to protect ours. Joel was willing to sacrifice a cure for humanity and the lives of even the unarmed and defenseless (let alone killing plenty of others).
-Conversely I don't think Ramsey was all that great in this one after back to back to back excellent performances. I get that Ellie is supposed to be pensive and nervous heading into this momentous destiny but I just wasn't feeling much from her until the last scene.
-I think part of what probably held Ramsey back was that the dialogue scenes didn't get enough room to breathe. I agree with what someone else said, it wouldn't work to extend Joel's rampage more than what we got. I think that risks extending into tedious action for action's sake. People are saying this was note for note just like the game so idk what more you could add but maybe you let the Ellie and Joel moments breathe a little more. It's not that I think those moments weren't powerful, but they did feel a bit rushed.
That was well before they knew what was involved. Ellie was never asked if she'd be willing to sacrifice her life.Joel did give Ellie a choice. He offered to take her back to Tommy and she turned it down because they'd come so far and she didn't want it to be for nothing.
That was one of the irritating bits. They absolutely should've asked her.That was well before they knew what was involved. Ellie was never asked if she'd be willing to sacrifice her life.
We know what her answer would be (in part because of the conversations that occur afterwards) - but she wasn't actually given the choice by either Joel or Marlene.
The point is that they don't. Ellie is stripped of her agency.That was one of the irritating bits. They absolutely should've asked her.
But it doesn't make sense.The point is that they don't. Ellie is stripped of her agency.
You said that Joel was too afraid to ask her because of what her answer might be. I don't understand how you can blame him for not giving her that choice when he didn't learn what was involved until he woke up and she was already unconscious.That was well before they knew what was involved. Ellie was never asked if she'd be willing to sacrifice her life.
He didn't just stop the procedure to wait for Ellie to decide, he murdered the surgeon! He killed Marlene to stop her from coming after Ellie in the future. He invented a lie cover story to tell Ellie after the fact, and built into that lie are statements designed to make Ellie think there's no point in going down that route again. He told her there were others like her, dozens. He told her that they had stopped looking for a cure. He intentionally set up a narrative where she wouldn't have incentive to try something like that again. Through all these actions, he took away Ellie's choice - just as Marlene had done.You said that Joel was too afraid to ask her because of what her answer might be. I don't understand how you can blame him for not giving her that choice when he didn't learn what was involved until he woke up and she was already unconscious.
Of course it does. The Fireflies had made up their mind and they didn't want to risk losing the very real possibility of a cure. The chance of a vaccine was bigger than Ellie's agency, it was bigger than any of them. They also saw it as the most humane option, as Ellie wouldn't have any fear or pain.But it doesn't make sense.
Wait, why? I agree it's the right thing to do in that situation but under the circumstances with two characters pushed to their extremes it absolutely makes sense why both Marlene and Joel would disregard Ellie's right to choose what happens to her. One wants to save the human race, one wants to save himself and the adoptive daughter he loves. Both at the expense of Ellie's agency to choose.But it doesn't make sense.