Toggle sidebar

The Kings new conference.

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
DryIslandBartender

DryIslandBartender

KCCO
Jun 30, 2006
5,632
2,520
What is the new conference makeup going to look like and what are the new playoff rules? Will it be tougher for the Kings to make the playoffs or easier? I am confused on this new setup the NHL is implementing.
Click to read more...
 
As I understand it, the "pacific" division will be made up of Calgary, Edmonton, Vancouver, San Jose, Anaheim, Phoenix (or whoever by next season) and LA. The top 4 teams make the playoffs, at which point 1 plays 4 and 2 plays 3, then the 2 winners will play each other. Not sure how they decide who plays who when they get down to 1 from each of the 4 conferences though.
 
dsafsdfdsfsdfadsfsdfs_original.jpg


If Phoenix moves to Seattle, the NHL won't have to make any adjustments to the division the Kings will be playing in as they'd be within the Pacific timezone.
 
1.Chicago 77
2.St.Louis 60
3.Minnesota 55
4.Winnipeg 51(22 ROW)
5.Dallas 48
6.Nashville 41
7.Colorado 39

1.Anaheim 66
2.Los Angeles 59
3.Vancouver 59
4.San Jose 57
5.Phoenix 51(17 ROW)
6.Edmonton 45
7.Calgary 42

Top 3 in each group have guaranteed spots. The last two are wild cards, and they go to the two teams with the best remaining records, regardless of group. The division winner with the most points plays the wild card team with the fewest points in the 1st round, regardless of group. The rest of the matchups are based on division standings. In the above scenario, that means Chicago vs. Winnipeg. However, if Phoenix were to be the 2nd wild card team, they play Chicago, and the Coyotes would stay in the "Midwest" divisional playoff bracket until they're eliminated.

They could've changed things by the time everything is announced officially, but that's what was agreed to when last we heard about it.
 
I'm curious as to why the mods haven't changed the forum. Years over. We're in a new conference as of now IMO. CHANGE THE DAMN BOARDS! :sarcasm:
 
cnshockey said:
I'm curious as to why the mods haven't changed the forum. Years over. We're in a new conference as of now IMO. CHANGE THE DAMN BOARDS! :sarcasm:
Click to expand...

Might be waiting for a name change and for things in the NHL to calm down a bit before they do a bit of an overhaul to the board organization.

I expect the change some time after free agency starts.
 
KingsFan7824 said:
1.Chicago 77
2.St.Louis 60
3.Minnesota 55
4.Winnipeg 51(22 ROW)
5.Dallas 48
6.Nashville 41
7.Colorado 39

1.Anaheim 66
2.Los Angeles 59
3.Vancouver 59
4.San Jose 57
5.Phoenix 51(17 ROW)
6.Edmonton 45
7.Calgary 42

Top 3 in each group have guaranteed spots. The last two are wild cards, and they go to the two teams with the best remaining records, regardless of group. The division winner with the most points plays the wild card team with the fewest points in the 1st round, regardless of group. The rest of the matchups are based on division standings. In the above scenario, that means Chicago vs. Winnipeg. However, if Phoenix were to be the 2nd wild card team, they play Chicago, and the Coyotes would stay in the "Midwest" divisional playoff bracket until they're eliminated.

They could've changed things by the time everything is announced officially, but that's what was agreed to when last we heard about it.
Click to expand...

The good news that I see, If I get this properly, is odds of the Kings facing the Blues again in the first round would be a long shot, unless the Kings have another so-and-so season and get a wild card spot...
 
Winger23 said:
The good news that I see, If I get this properly, is odds of the Kings facing the Blues again in the first round would be a long shot, unless the Kings have another so-and-so season and get a wild card spot...
Click to expand...

Vise versa could be true to. But ya way less of a chance.
The chance of an Anaheim LA series is a heck of a lot better.
 
Winger23 said:
The good news that I see, If I get this properly, is odds of the Kings facing the Blues again in the first round would be a long shot, unless the Kings have another so-and-so season and get a wild card spot...
Click to expand...

Correct - the only way we could face the Blues in the first round would be if we were the #1 seed in our division AND St. Louis was the 7 or 8 seed (depending on how many points the Div B winner has).

The positive I see in this is that if we are going to meet Chicago in the conference finals again (something I REALLY want next year) then it is FAR more likely that they will have gotten past St. Louis than we will.

I'm not going to say us playing St. Louis and SJ before Chicago allowed them to win the series this year, but I don't think there is any doubt it contributed to the loss.

Ziggy Stardust said:
If Phoenix moves to Seattle, the NHL won't have to make any adjustments to the division the Kings will be playing in as they'd be within the Pacific timezone.
Click to expand...

I am hoping for this SO much. I could go to three Kings games a year without ever leaving town.
 
Winger23 said:
The good news that I see, If I get this properly, is odds of the Kings facing the Blues again in the first round would be a long shot, unless the Kings have another so-and-so season and get a wild card spot...
Click to expand...

Or the Blues have a so-so season and get a wild card.

It's less likely the Kings will see the Blues early on, but still possible. If the Kings finish either 2nd or 3rd in the division, they're guaranteed to play someone from the west of the western conference in the 1st round. If they finish 1st or as a wild card, who knows.

I'm thinking the wild card idea is mostly for the teams in the east, as is usually the case. It could mess up the travel in the west come playoff time, which was one reason a new alignment was proposed in the first place.

The league and the PA are going to give the new alignment and playoff format a couple years, and then see if they want to change things again. It's really just a big experiment.
 
KingsFan7824 said:
Or the Blues have a so-so season and get a wild card.

It's less likely the Kings will see the Blues early on, but still possible. If the Kings finish either 2nd or 3rd in the division, they're guaranteed to play someone from the west of the western conference in the 1st round. If they finish 1st or as a wild card, who knows.

I'm thinking the wild card idea is mostly for the teams in the east, as is usually the case. It could mess up the travel in the west come playoff time, which was one reason a new alignment was proposed in the first place.

The league and the PA are going to give the new alignment and playoff format a couple years, and then see if they want to change things again. It's really just a big experiment.
Click to expand...

My hope would be eventual expansion, followed by 4, 8-team divisions. Each division goes 1v4 and 2v3, then winners vs each other, then division champ v division champ for the conference and the two conference winners for the cup.

You wanna build division rivalry, guarantee that EVERY team goes through two division opponents to get to the cup. Also, bring back the good ole division names (Smythe, Patrick, Norris, Adams)!!!
 
Instead of the classic Smythe, Norris, Adams, and Patrick divisions we should go with contemporary names like Gretzky, Lemieux, Orr, and Howe divisions :p: Not sure about the conferences so let's keep it East and West.
 
MynameisKing said:
Instead of the classic Smythe, Norris, Adams, and Patrick divisions we should go with contemporary names like Gretzky, Lemieux, Orr, and Howe divisions :p: Not sure about the conferences so let's keep it East and West.
Click to expand...

I was expecting a vote for cat beards from you of all people! :rant:
 
MynameisKing said:
Instead of the classic Smythe, Norris, Adams, and Patrick divisions we should go with contemporary names like Gretzky, Lemieux, Orr, and Howe divisions :p: Not sure about the conferences so let's keep it East and West.
Click to expand...

I think it's already been confirmed that they'll retain regional names to identify each division.
 
Division championships are going to carry a hell of a lot more weight starting next year. I'm excited. First two rounds will be bloodbaths for the most part with assured rivalries.
 
Richie10 said:
Division championships are going to carry a hell of a lot more weight starting next year. I'm excited. First two rounds will be bloodbaths for the most part with assured rivalries.
Click to expand...

The division champs and the wild card in the western conference are almost the worst place to be. You are the only teams that might have to travel outside your timezone by more than one zone to play games before the 3rd round.
 
jimmy1100 said:
My hope would be eventual expansion, followed by 4, 8-team divisions. Each division goes 1v4 and 2v3, then winners vs each other, then division champ v division champ for the conference and the two conference winners for the cup.

You wanna build division rivalry, guarantee that EVERY team goes through two division opponents to get to the cup. Also, bring back the good ole division names (Smythe, Patrick, Norris, Adams)!!!
Click to expand...

What about the Gretzky conference?
 
Ziggy Stardust said:
They talked to Gary Bettman on NHL Live around the time of the announcement of the realignment and they made that suggestion and he mentioned that they will likely go towards the regional names.
Click to expand...

Given that, it doesn't sound confirmed. Otherwise they would have officially named them all regionally, at the time of the realignment news.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom