The Kings are.. oof | Page 6 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

The Kings are.. oof

Good thing that players are not measured only in the playoffs - and ya it’s homerism despite how far you move the goal posts to fit the narratives. Please enlighten me on the accolades of kempe vs Matthews.

What a joke

Not sure why you are singling out Kempe - he's a stud and a gamer. Ask fans of other Pacific Division teams who play against him regularly what they think of him - I'm sure you'll hear praise.
 
Every team that's beaten Edmonton in the last 3 years has been the eventual Cup champion. Beating the Oilers 4/7 games is no easy feat.
Beating the Oilers isn't easy, but that bit of trivia doesn't really prove it. In 2022, the team that beat the Oilers had a 50% chance of winning the Cup after that. In 2023, it was a 25% chance. In 2024, it was a 100% chance. Those are good odds. As you go further in the playoffs, your chance of being or losing to the eventual Cup champion skyrockets. The Oilers have consistently gone far, and that's what proves that they're good, not what the teams that beat them went on to do. The same goes for the Kings, who shouldn't use the Oilers' success as an excuse or comfort for the last 4 years, either.
 
Respectfully man, as a Kings fan…


You’re wrong.

They are a 'pretty good' team

But unfortunately firmly in the 'not talented enough to out-talent you' category with no help on the way there unless Greentree is Mario Lemieux and

Also unfortunately not firmly in the "tough/dirty enough to run you thru the walls in a 7 game series" category

So they're good enough to rack up good regular seasons--it's a talented roster with a great defense--but not good enough OR tough enough to go further. It's not a good place for the GM to be in. They're still identity-less. They are exactly who we said they'd be at the beginning of any season since 2022, a wild card or low divisional seed that's first-round fodder. They just do a slightly better job of fooling us almost every year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fripp and Osprey
Sure, I'll play.

The Kings blow it up and trade away Kopitar, Doughty, Fiala, Kempe and Danault. All players who are old enough where they probably have either slowed down or retired when the team is ready to compete again.

What's step 2?

Tank next year because next year is a ridiculous draft.
 
They are a 'pretty good' team

But unfortunately firmly in the 'not talented enough to out-talent you' category with no help on the way there unless Greentree is Mario Lemieux and

Also unfortunately not firmly in the "tough/dirty enough to run you thru the walls in a 7 game series" category

So they're good enough to rack up good regular seasons--it's a talented roster with a great defense--but not good enough OR tough enough to go further. It's not a good place for the GM to be in. They're still identity-less. They are exactly who we said they'd be at the beginning of any season since 2022, a wild card or low divisional seed that's first-round fodder. They just do a slightly better job of fooling us almost every year.

The 2025 Kings had three second lines, two 2nd pair d-pairs and very little in what would be considered aggressive, tough or agitating players among those 13 players. And I don't think that was by accident, they want system players above all else, and if someone emerges more beyond that, great. But it can't be at the expense of the defensive system.

This type of roster construction is just doomed to fail every year with the arms race in the Western Conference.

This is the frustrating thing about out a lot of our fanbase (not you). I just don't know how people got fooled this year (for a fourth time), when the same foundational problems that existed the three previous years were still around. I was absolutely shocked with how many "Kings in a sweep" and "Kings in 5" posts there were.

None of the people who drank the Kool-Aid ever wanted to answer a simple question, how many teams that had neither a top 15C or a top 15D have had success in the western conf playoffs in this decade? I still can't get any of them to give me examples. The immediate retort was to say how this Kings team was "different" and they were ready to make a run because "Insert some lame canned cliche" , some of the shit was hilarious.

"Tougher to play against"
"Will steamroll the Oilers with depth"
"More committed to winning board battles"
"Tighter lockerroom this season"
"Young players taking ownership" (and then Hiller proceeded to bench or scratch most young players)
"Everyone buying into the system"
"They just really care about each other this season"

And then they still lose, even with the Oilers #1 d-man being out.

None of these "little things" and "intangibles" that messageboard fans drastically overrate are going to be enough for the Kings to beat the great teams in the west. And I think this year the Oilers were worse than Dallas and Colorado, and probably a toss-up with a healthy Winnipeg. If the Kings had played Dallas or Colorado they would have been slaughtered.

And the real kick in the balls, because of this playoff system, there is a very good chance that we will be subject to this again next season, at least it will be interesting to see what Jamie Kompon like cliches people can come up with as to why the 5th time will be a charm as Anze Kopitar and Drew Doughty assume their regular roles as 1C and 1D in their age 38 and 36 seasons.
 
For all the smack talk Leafs got about consistently losing to Boston, and running back with the same core “the definition of insanity”..

This kings team is brutal. 4 straight years of losing to the oilers who have started sieves in net, including this year where career backup/AHL goalie Calvin Pickard 4-0’s them.

Since 2015 they have either missed the playoffs or lost in the first round.

At what point do we stop ignoring this teams faults and ask if they should blow it up?
They are stuck in a middle of a black hole. It will be yrs before they realize what's going on.
 
The 2025 Kings had three second lines, two 2nd pair d-pairs and very little in what would be considered aggressive, tough or agitating players among those 13 players. And I don't think that was by accident, they want system players above all else, and if someone emerges more beyond that, great. But it can't be at the expense of the defensive system.

This type of roster construction is just doomed to fail every year with the arms race in the Western Conference.

This is the frustrating thing about out a lot of our fanbase (not you). I just don't know how people got fooled this year (for a fourth time), when the same foundational problems that existed the three previous years were still around. I was absolutely shocked with how many "Kings in a sweep" and "Kings in 5" posts there were.

None of the people who drank the Kool-Aid ever wanted to answer a simple question, how many teams that had neither a top 15C or a top 15D have had success in the western conf playoffs in this decade? I still can't get any of them to give me examples. The immediate retort was to say how this Kings team was "different" and they were ready to make a run because "Insert some lame canned cliche" , some of the shit was hilarious.

"Tougher to play against"
"Will steamroll the Oilers with depth"
"More committed to winning board battles"
"Tighter lockerroom this season"
"Young players taking ownership" (and then Hiller proceeded to bench or scratch most young players)
"Everyone buying into the system"
"They just really care about each other this season"

And then they still lose, even with the Oilers #1 d-man being out.

None of these "little things" and "intangibles" that messageboard fans drastically overrate are going to be enough for the Kings to beat the great teams in the west. And I think this year the Oilers were worse than Dallas and Colorado, and probably a toss-up with a healthy Winnipeg. If the Kings had played Dallas or Colorado they would have been slaughtered.

And the real kick in the balls, because of this playoff system, there is a very good chance that we will be subject to this again next season, at least it will be interesting to see what Jamie Kompon like cliches people can come up with as to why the 5th time will be a charm as Anze Kopitar and Drew Doughty assume their regular roles as 1C and 1D in their age 38 and 36 seasons.
This is actually all nonsense.

There is no right or wrong way to win and series, and whether or not Kopitar and Doughty are top 15 in productuon was totally irrelevant.

The Kings lost due to the same mental weakness that has plagued them since the departures of the REAL leadership of the 12-14 Cup runs. Their leaders are front runners who collapse the second they are challenged.

This was an easily winnable series for the Kings. They did have the depth, the offense, the defense, the board play - all the right boxes checked off to sweep Edmonton. They lost because their best players play not to lose instead of playing to win. There isn't anybody in that room with the clout to grab the team, put them on his back and respond to shifts in momentum properly.
 
Good thing that players are not measured only in the playoffs - and ya it’s homerism despite how far you move the goal posts to fit the narratives. Please enlighten me on the accolades of kempe vs Matthews.

What a joke
Kempe is genuinely levels above Matthews in the playoffs. He's done more damage against the Oilers in one series than Matthews has in his entire playoff career.
 
This is actually all nonsense.

There is no right or wrong way to win and series, and whether or not Kopitar and Doughty are top 15 in productuon was totally irrelevant.

The Kings lost due to the same mental weakness that has plagued them since the departures of the REAL leadership of the 12-14 Cup runs. Their leaders are front runners who collapse the second they are challenged.

This was an easily winnable series for the Kings. They did have the depth, the offense, the defense, the board play - all the right boxes checked off to sweep Edmonton. They lost because their best players play not to lose instead of playing to win. There isn't anybody in that room with the clout to grab the team, put them on his back and respond to shifts in momentum properly.

I know, it's always the blame of two of the best players in franchise history. They get none of the credit for the good, and all of the blame for the bad.

We know you thought it was an easily winnable series, were you shining them up so that if they won you could give all of the credit to guys like Warren Foegele and Joel Edmundson?

The Top 15 D and Top 15C is just simply asking a question, if it's such a common way to win, surely there would be plenty of teams in history who have won that way. But hey props to you for at least acknowledging the question, that is more than most of the "we are right there" fans will do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: King'sPawn

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad