The jury is officially in: Alexis Lafreniere is a complete bust

Status
Not open for further replies.

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,173
18,761
Mulberry Street
I still don't think so. He's played LW his entire career, on the Rangers he's stuck behind Bread and Kreider, that won't change because they're both there long term. This year is really the first time he's ever had a chance at a top 6 role and it's on his off-side, that's not an easy shift to make, especially at the NHL level for a 22 year old kid.

Yes this is a lot of time spent making excuses, but like.. what else is he supposed to do. Some ppl are saying that he should be outplaying Panarin or Kreider as a 19-22 year old... please.

I think of Laf as a 1st overall pick who's gotten late first round opportunity. Given the situation his development hasn't been unexpectedly terrible, it's just been a really bad situation for him. More importantly, no easy solution because the Rangers are / have been win-now, they're not going to give reps to some kid just so they can be a worse team with Panarin or Kreider out of their top six.

***

All that to say, 100% agree that a trade clearly would make sense. I'd take him on the coyotes in half a second, stick him with one of your top development centers (in this case, Cooley) for at least 10-15 games and see what Laf can do with actual opportunity on his preferred side. Pretty sure every rebuilding team would do the same thing wrt Laf's development

Kreider is nothing special and a 50 point forward (minus one career year). If Laf was worth the hype then he should've easily been able to. play above him in the lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan

PANARIN BREAD FAN

Registered User
Feb 18, 2019
1,135
719
Carcone in less time than it took to write this post. Done.

In all seriousness I'd give you a good but not elite prospect for him, like a deal based around someone like Conor Geekie (who I think is an inarguably better asset than Carcone, but if you want Carcone then have at him). Do you think that would actually be enough to get something done?
wait - not maccelli? you said you would hook up 13 with cooley. even over zucker? if that's the case you would deal maccelli even up without having to mention others? as far as carcone is concerned i'm in a huge minority group in thinking that i'd rather have him than 13.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,593
14,122
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
Should've just traded the pick I guess.
I still feel like Vancouver is going to offer some ridiculous package for him and regret it instantly like we do with pretty much all of our trades.
PA "Brock, we've traded you to the Rangers, you've gotten your wish, best of luck to you"
BB - "Wait, I rescinded my trade request, I like the direction the team is heading in n...."
PA "Brock, we've traded you to the Rangers. Best of luck"
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

Jeune Poulet

Registered User
Oct 31, 2019
1,901
4,523
It's been said by the smarter posters on HF since Laf's second season: whatever potential Lafrenière had, the Rangers were not going to get it out of him and were better off trading him while his value was still high.

The more time passes, the less of a valuable reclamation project he is and the less likely that the Rangers will get good value for him.

It's inevitable that he will end up elsewhere, so you gotta wonder what's the point for the Rangers in waiting pointlessly and wasting all the value of the 1st overall gloss?
 

PANARIN BREAD FAN

Registered User
Feb 18, 2019
1,135
719
Kreider is nothing special and a 50 point forward (minus one career year). If Laf was worth the hype then he should've easily been able to. play above him in the lineup.
if 13 and kaako were close to being what he was projected to be then the deals for copp, vatrano and tank wouldn't have been necessary. i wished those were still on the team.
 

AndreRoy

Registered User
Jan 3, 2018
4,466
3,593
You wonder if he had been sent back to work on things and continue his growth instead of buried on a roaster trying to win now and being punished for mistakes and killing all confidence if he could be a player.

The Lightning tried to do that with Drouin and we all saw how that turned out. Not that Laf would necessarily have responded the same way, but sometimes a bust is just a bust no matter what the team does with him.
 

SimpleJack

Registered User
Jul 25, 2013
6,817
4,533
What an epic bust this guy turned out to be.

If he and Kakko would have reached their potential(like they should have based on the hype and expectations) then the NYR would be an absolute powerhouse with a loaded top 6 full of firepower. Instead their combined ineptitude has held back the team from becoming the Cup contender that many expected. They peaked in the 2022 playoffs.
 

LokiDog

Get pucks deep. Get pucks to the net. And, uh…
Sep 13, 2018
12,025
23,986
Dallas
Are they waiting until he's 27 to move him?

#FreeLafreniere

70a90259-44b9-4672-997b-93fe033ab45e_TVASPORTS_WEB.jpg

Plot twist: he is 27 and that’s why he sucks. He was dominating 16 & 17 year old kids at a 23 year old with a full beard in juniors, pretending he was 17 himself. Now he’s already earned a few millions in the NHL, the con worked, he’s just happy to be here.
 

Oneiro

Registered User
Mar 28, 2013
9,934
12,114
One player not developing is whatever. Two is I guess misfortune.

But 4-5-6? I’m not writing Laf off yet but a Rangers fan should really question what the development process is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

Guttersniped

Satan’s Wallpaper
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,904
51,462
Im curious, did you ignore the GP? Regardless, he hasn't been great. I agree. Not sure he is worst of those as he brings more than, for example, Nail did when not having the puck.

Also when adjusting for GP it seems as though he is better than a few of these "busts" so far.

Now do Joe Thornton
First 3 seasons
213 games played, 42 goals, 66 assists, 108 points

Here ya go.

Most of these players have more PP production than Lafrenière obviously, which helps.

Regular Season
BFF86C4A-4822-40A3-A0A8-E71F80FD8B29.jpeg
5ACFAC2B-9C2C-4CC4-8898-CA3253477E36.jpeg

Playoffs
124A46FC-E7F1-4508-A685-3E792A3912BD.jpeg
EF227AE9-CE2D-48D4-B1E8-A0254A18D127.jpeg

Regular Season
FE0C1C2A-DC6F-4323-954E-D524C8B64EB3.jpeg
40E96B9C-A15E-4008-8971-F4E639E06F75.jpeg

Playoffs
9EF37C00-6569-4D3F-8866-5CF6B760EF23.jpeg

1E9A30D5-E279-4724-BF2C-16190FDA866E.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: HBK27

BostonBruins11

Registered User
Dec 4, 2010
2,044
1,655
Moncton, N.B.
He's like a less offensively talented Winger version of Charlie Coyle. I could see him grow his game to a 40-50 pts player, top end 3rd liner or complementary 2nd liner.

How's his 2-way game though?
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,960
42,451
Sometimes you just have to be lucky to NOT win the lottery and have to pick another player.

He was the clear # 1.

100% this.

If a team says they had some other guy on their board as #1, they're full of shit. I think Ottawa tried to claim Stutzle was their number one guy, again crock of shit.

I'm sure another organization who coulve given him a bigger role and perhaps is better at 'developmen't than the Rangers mightve been (be) able to make him a 45 point player instead of a 30-35 point player, but the biggest part is that the player is just not good. He wouldn't have come close to as advertised no matter what team/situation he was drafted into.
 

PainForShane

formerly surfshop
Dec 24, 2019
2,872
3,304
wait - not maccelli? you said you would hook up 13 with cooley. even over zucker? if that's the case you would deal maccelli even up without having to mention others? as far as carcone is concerned i'm in a huge minority group in thinking that i'd rather have him than 13.

No, not Maccelli. Macc is a weird case because he came out of nowhere and has shown flashes of elite vision combined with above average passing, I don't think any Zona fan would be surprised if Macc were able to get to an assist heavy 60 points every year even playing with plugs in the middle six. And if he starts shooting maybe he gets to 20g and almost PPG, who knows.

Just as possible last year was a fluke. But he's earned the opportunity he's gotten, and at this point I think we'd want to see what Maccelli actually is. And ideally just keep the guy as a complementary offensive producer.

**

Regarding Zucker, yeah I'd prefer to give Laf reps with Cooley instead, Zucker's a 31 year old winger on a one-year deal, not entirely sure he is or should be part of our core going forward. And it's not like we're trying to win now anyway so who cares if we're 10-15 points out of the playoffs or 20 points, it's essentially the same thing.

Either way, something like a good prospect plus a little bit is what I think Zona would part with. Carcone easily, imo Maccelli is a bit much at this stage of both their careers
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkusNaslund19

PANARIN BREAD FAN

Registered User
Feb 18, 2019
1,135
719
No, not Maccelli. Macc is a weird case because he came out of nowhere and has shown flashes of elite vision combined with above average passing, I don't think any Zona fan would be surprised if Macc were able to get to an assist heavy 60 points every year even playing with plugs in the middle six. And if he starts shooting maybe he gets to 20g and almost PPG, who knows.

Just as possible last year was a fluke. But he's earned the opportunity he's gotten, and at this point I think we'd want to see what Maccelli actually is. And ideally just keep the guy as a complementary offensive producer.

**

Regarding Zucker, yeah I'd prefer to give Laf reps with Cooley instead, Zucker's a 31 year old winger on a one-year deal, not entirely sure he is or should be part of our core going forward. And it's not like we're trying to win now anyway so who cares if we're 10-15 points out of the playoffs or 20 points, it's essentially the same thing.

Either way, something like a good prospect plus a little bit is what I think Zona would part with. Carcone easily, imo Maccelli is a bit much at this stage of both their careers
ehh heh - hey don't fault me - i took a shot
 
  • Like
Reactions: PainForShane
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad