sfvega
Registered User
- Apr 20, 2015
- 3,319
- 2,722
It's left me speechless on several occasions.
Krug was fine this year. He wasn't an all star, but he was fine. Basically got what we paid for.
One of the issues with Krug is that this is supposed to be the good part of his contract. Year 1 wasn't terrible, but it wasn't great either. But years 5-7 probably don't look great. For him to be worth that contract in totality, he needs to be flat out better while still in his "prime."
The idea is that he can adjust like Faulk did, but maybe that doesn't happen. Scandella was probably worse his 2nd year here, but that's not as fun to think about.