Movies: The Halloween Franchise
- Thread starter Ben Grimm
- Start date
Pranzo Oltranzista
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 3,981
- 2,900
Oh, if you're going to give me a thread to paste that, here's my comments on the films from my last rewatch frenzy (had to stop because I couldn't stand the idea of rewatching Ressurection).
Halloween (Carpenter, 1978) – I am fully aware this is supposed to be the superior film and bestest slasher ever. It's just not (IMO). I mean, it's still a pretty decent movie, and I still think it is an important slasher and has to be seen by any fan of the genre, but there's so many things that just don't work for me that it's hard not to think it's overrated (I don't think, for example, that it should be considered more important than Black Christmas, nor a better film). Most of all – and I guess it's kind of a “hot take” – Donald Pleasance's Dr Loomis kind of ruins the film. That character is so bad that I can't rewatch Halloween without considering him an accomplice to Myers, and probably the crazier of the pair. I've watched the extended TV version and it only adds to that feeling (his reaction towards a 6 y/o boy (foreshadowing his inexcusable behavior around the little girl in parts 4&5?) certainly aren't that of a psychiatrist). Don't worry, I know the film is not supposed to be read that way, but the guy leaves the hospital car for Myers to escape with, knows instantly where Myers is going, makes one stop during his 150 miles trip to Haddonfield, exactly where Myers stopped to kill someone and steal his overalls, there he manages to find the nurse's matchbox in the grass but not the body that lies three feet away from him, he sends the cop in every and all directions except the right one, he pretends he doesn't see the hospital car at the hardware store, pretends he doesn't see it right next to him the whole time he waits at the Myers house, and he tells the sheriff not to inform the population. The guy is shady, obsessed with a patient that hasn't said a word in 15 years. It's hard to think it's not blanks that he shoots at Myers.
I won't even comment on the fact that the 6 y/o boy who spends 15 years staring at the window without speaking to anyone knows how to drive when he escapes, because it's probably Loomis who taught him. The extended version has the “Sister” marking in Myers' hospital room that introduce the sequel's family twist. I think it kind of saves the day for the killer, who's too easily read as a frustrated incel who follows women around. At some point, he follows Laurie and her friend, in his stolen hospital car, from daylight to darkness, without them noticing him even though they know a weirdo with a stationwagon has been following them. He's bumper to bumper the whole time! This goes with my second big problem with the film: Carpenter's spatial construction. The body in the grass, the car that Loomis doesn't see even though it's right beside him, the doors that don't open the right way, the interiors that don't match the exteriors of the houses, and Laurie's fall in the staircase – nothing works. You have to give it to Carpenter for a few amazing moments (Myers coming out of the shadows, wow, but right after that he tries to stab Laurie and misses her even though she's 3 inches from him and doesn't see him coming, which for some reason pushes her over the handrail and into the stairs), but I just don't think he's that good a director at that time. The robbery at the hardware store is really hard to place in the timeline too. The film has some cool atmosphere at times, but it has so many weaknesses that I have a hard time going over 5.5/10.
Halloween II (Rosenthal, 1981) – It had been a while since I'd seen this one. I usually refer to it as my favorite slasher, and it might just be. The last 30 minutes probably are. The ride to get there is a little bumpy, but this last stretch has Michael Myers at his most threatening (and better looking), and manages to create a dark and claustrophobic atmosphere in the hospital. Dr Loomis even almost looks sane and credible (not really but a lot more than usual) for a few minutes there. The first hour is certainly a lot weaker, with cheap and ineffective “scares” (the cat in the dumpster, the killer behind the closing door – stuff that makes you wonder how few ideas Carpenter was left with), even one that is so weirdly constructed that I had to rewind it a few times (the girl goes towards the door at the right of the frame, something very common to get the spectator's attention to that side of the frame, the jump scare comes from another side, sure, but you have Myers jumping on her from mid-frame as if he was... on the floor?) - but I think it was the only time in this one I had to try to figure out spatial construction, a huge improvement on the original. Some of the kills in the first hour are way too sophisticated for a man who's been locked up since he was 6 years old, but since he somehow learned to drive, I guess he might have pick up some other skills. It's still a little inconsistent with his other range of actions (can't push a door open, walks through it). Points to the sheriff for acknowledging Loomis is in cahoots with Myers. 6/10
Halloween III: Season of the Witch (Wallace, 1982) - Very dark paranoid thriller mixed with decent gore. Gotta love the balls on this one, aiming for the children and not hesitating melting one with critters coming out of his face. The premise is great, the tone is great, but other than that, it's saddly pretty silly. The inexplicable stonehenge mystical bullshit is just too much, and the romance between the fugly womanizer doctor and the young lady who just lost her father the day before is hilarious (the line where she asks him where he'd like to sleep got me laughing out loud). Includes a little sexual harrassment seminar in the workplace with our good doctor slapping the ass of his lady colleague for fun. The film is on Roger Ebert's most hated list, but it's miles better than parts 4, 5, 6, H20, & Resurrection. In fact, I kind of like it. 4.5/10
Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (Little, 1988) - After box office failure and poor fans reception, the halloween anthology films idea that was launched with the third entry was flushed and inevitably, Michael Myers did indeed return. Now, the Halloween series has never been that good with continuity or logic (Myers escapes the loony bin at 21 years old after 15 years locked up but has no problem stealing a car, the first film ends with Loomis shooting Myers 6 times, but the second one begins with Loomis firing 7 shots - and then telling everyone he shot him 6 times, etc.), so it's only natural that after being burned alive and blinded, Myers returns has a dude that can walk around in a store to steal a mask with no problem, or drive a tow truck... This fourth entry is just a below-average slasher, with a very off-putting ending with Tommy Jarvis vibes. It still manages to look "ok" in a very weak series of films. 3/10
Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers (Othenin-Girard, 1989) - The premise of this one is the best of all (on a ridicule scale): after the events of the previous film, a wounded Myers crawls out of danger to a river that leads him to the hideout of a homeless man. He tries to attack him but collapses. One year later, next Halloween, Myers wakes up and kills the guy, who for some reason kept a comatose huge man in his tiny home for a whole year (or was he conscious and friendly this whole time?). Afterwards it's just the same crap, but with added bullshit (telepathy between young female Jarvis and Myers, some strange unidentified cult figure following Myers around) - you know how I like to read stuff into movies, and I'd love to use the fact that the killer is now played by a Native American and try to make the whole occult stuff make sense, but I don't think it's possible. The only good thing about the 5th film is that it confirms Loomis was the real psychopath all along (the only fun I have now revisiting the classic Halloween film is to read it with Loomis as the psychotic mastermind and Myers as his homicidal pet project - always knowing where he'll be, sending cops away from him to clear his path, shooting blanks at him, etc.) - his behavior around the little girl here is just wrong. 2/10
Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (Chappelle, 1995) - The Carpenter film was such a simple story... One sequel after the other (actually starting with the original film's own TV version), people tried to be interesting and "explain" the whys and the hows of Michael Myers, without understanding that all this dumb stuff worked only because it was left unsaid. Now this 6th entry tries to tie up everything that happened before, and tries to make unintelligible stuff make sense. Tommy Doyle, the little boy Laurie was babysitting in the first film, is back and prepared for Michael's return. He moved next door to the Myers house, where Laurie's cousins lives unknowingly (yeah right, all eveybody in this town talks about is Michael Myers, but they wouldn't know they live in his old house) - and why do they live there? Because their uncle - Laurie's father - was the estate agent in charge of selling it (indeed he was in the original film), but never managed to do it, for obvious reason, so his brother made him a favor and moved his family in the murder house. Also, well, that unidentified man in black that followed MM around and ultimately destroyed the police station and killed everyone to free him (where MM was jailed with his mask on, never forget) is revealed to be Loomis' superior from the lunatic ward in the first film. Oh and Jamie was abducted by his cult at the end of part 5 (not in the movie, but believable), and this one starts with her giving birth to a baby marked by evil... That's already a lot, and that's nothing about what actually happens in the film.
Now there's two versions of this film. Different scripts, bickering on the set, a very poor test screening and a lot of changes that went against everybody's wishes and/or understanding of the film. Oh, and Donald Pleasance died before they shot additional material, nothing to help them. Speaking of the devil, Loomis appears a lot more sane than usual, but the theatrical cut ends up with him going back to Michael's body saying he has “a little business to attend to” and they disappear together (pretty much confirming he was only working with him from the beginning!) - the “producers' cut” and much better, the cult leader's powers are transferred to Loomis, making him responsible for MM and all future killer kids (yeah, that's a thing). That cut also includes stuff like a little incest between Michael and his niece, and the cult leader guy working at the ward explaining he was the one who taught Michael how to drive (they really wanted to explain everything with this one – still, Jamie who's been captive since she was 8 also escapes and knows how to drive... I guess it's just something you know). It's really a mess, and not a very good one (despite a few ok-efficient scenes), with missing parts and weird transitions, and some early 90s music video aesthetics here and there. It's still better than parts 4 and 5, and probably better than H20 and, of course, Resurrection... 3/10
Halloween H20: 20 Years Later (Miner, 1998) - I remember absolutely hating this film when it first came out. It's not as amateurish as the 3 previous chapters, but it is on the other hand so formulaic that it feels more like a made-for-TV pastiche than a sequel. Also, intertextuality is an amazing tool to bring depth and meaning to a work, to make a closed narrative reach out to other works for hints and ideas or tone ; Intertextuality is also the worst way to try to make something look cool or smart when it actually isn't. Kevin Williamson doesn't have his name in the writing credits of this film, but it stinks of his empty allusions the whole way through, and it's insufferable. It's really part 7, but they decided to cut all mentions of 4-5-6 and do as if they didn't exist - still, they were in the original screenplay and the new timeline was just some more unnecessary bullcrap. Bringing in Steve Miner was Jamie Lee Curtis' idea, and probably was a good one. I just wish I could go over 3/10.
And for the record, I like Zombie's remakes, the sequel even more than the first one (despite the cheesy white horse and mother crap). As for Resurrection, I think it would fall at 1.5/10 or close to that. It's not "so bad it's good", it's just really bad.
edit:
Halloween (Green, 2018) – This was my initial comment posted here a year ago: Finally catched that one now that it's on Netflix Canada... Never understood how they thought it could be a good idea to, once again, make a sequel to only part of the Halloween films (H20 + H:Resurrection tried that with Jamie Lee Curtis and failed, and now the premise was even worse, also ignoring Halloween II, which is probably the best film of the whole lot, and only to put aside the brother-sister relationship). But no, they had to do it so extra-old Laurie Strode, now with a big "what would Sarah Connor do?" fetish, would get a third timeline (she already died twice!) to go against her non-brother. She has 40 years to prepare and both her trap and her plan are completely dumb. The Zombie films were far superior. 3/10 I'll add that the film tries to do a lot of what the original did, but it always feel clumsy: the no drinking (bad), smoking (bad), sex (bad) thing and the babysitter stuff are just ironic at this point, the crazy obsessed doctor is pushed way beyond the limits of suspension of disbelief (Loomis was already something, this one is ridiculous). There's a few scenes you've already seen in other entries with better execution and results, and I can't get over the fact that it kind of mocks the brother-sister storyline even though it really appeared in (the extended version of) the first film. I still have it at 3/10, but I must push it below H4 and H20 in the overall ranking.
edit 2:
Halloween (Zombie, 2007) – I am well aware that the Zombie remakes have a bad reputation. I am not myself a big fan of the Myers portrayed as a white trash family (and I can't stand Sheri Moon, her suicide scene is absolutely ridiculous!), and I think the background and explanations on the killer's persona are counterproductive in that they diminish the character more than they add to it (I do, on the other hand, appreciate the “love hurts” angle brought to his quest). Still, you can't really argue against the fact that Zombie has the strongest signature of all the directors who played with this material. The result – like it or not – is a lot more coherent as a whole, with clear intent and direction, than every other entries of the series. This first take might not be a great film (it's a very good Halloween film IMO), but it's a brutal film, and a pretty dark slasher. I'm not too sure about that version of Loomis, as much as I've crapped on that character, I still enjoyed his ambivalence (and I must admit I get a kick out of the “These are the eyes of a psychopath” speech, during which Zombie shows us the eyes of Loomis, and not of Michael – also, the “you've became like my best friend” Loomis says to Michael). 4.5/10
Halloween II (Zombie, 2009) – Hard film to rate for me. I understand why most people absolutely hate it. The switch in tone and style, not only from the original series but even from the first film, is somewhat off-putting – and the new elements are either borderline unbearable (the emo/grunge Laurie Strode) or unbearably corny (the wannabe surrealist dream sequences and wannabe Freudian/Jungian imagery). Loomis is nothing more here than a caricature, the vocabulary level is abysmal (f*** f*** f***), and the lead actress is suddenly really bad (she wasn't that bad in the previous one). Still, I like this film a lot! I think the first 22 or 23 minutes are masterful – that's a fifth of the whole film, from which Laurie just wakes up, with no indication that any of it was part of what really happened following the previous film. Not only a pretty ballsy move in itself, but that long dream sequence is in fact introduced by a weird intellectualizing quote about the white horse in opening credits (from a book that I don't think really exists), pointing to the interpretation of dreams. The dream sequence also betrays itself through another intertext (an existing one this time) with the stretching of the Nights In White Satin music video, never reaching the end (brilliant reflexivity). That sequence is also a remake of Halloween II, contained in the sequel to the remake of Halloween. To me, this long introduction to the film is at a level no other slasher ever reached. Add to that some beautiful night shots, a few brilliant dissolves, and directorial amuse-gueules (Annie's murder first told only in sound), and you've got a very special film (I'm also partial to this rendition of Michael Myers as a gritty and brutal force). As clumsy as some of the dream visuals that appear after the introductory dream sequence may be, I think they contribute to the overall oneiric tone of the film. Zombie toyed with the idea of having Laurie as the real killer in the film and Michael only in her imagination, and part of these ideas were kept (the Welcome to my Nighmare tag in her room, notably, but also the dream where she reproduces some of Michael's murders from the first film). This adds a layer of ambiguity to the final film (reinforced by the finale), which might just have added to people's disgust with it but that I think helps making it a more unique horror film. I had it at 6/10 and will keep it there.
edit 3:
Halloween Kills (Green, 2021) – The introduction of the “original characters” in the bar after the bird caller's scary reminder of Haddonfield's murders is so clumsy that you just knew the film would be a disaster. I guess they thought it was fan servicing to bring back a half handful of characters nobody cared about, just to off them for good this time. I liked the 1978 bits and the return of Donald Pleasance, but absolutely hated the 2021 characters and storyline – the vulgar interracial couple, the comic-relief gay couple, and the doctor-nurse black couple were all exhausting reminders that this movie right here was very much of its times. I enjoyed the brutal and merciless version of Michael Myers, akin to the Zombie one, but that's just 10-15 minutes of the film, the rest of it was either working on repetition alone and felt overdone (the whole mob-going-dumb thing was pretty bad, and one more time for the back row: Evil dies tonight!) or undercooked (the rushed 'he made us into monsters' wasn't working at all). It might be better than the previous one by a hair, but only because it got rid of the most ridiculous stuff. 3/10
edit 4:
Halloween Ends (Green, 2022) – The opening credits try to tell you something: this ain't your regular Halloween movie. Not the original's and usual orange font, but the blue one used for Halloween III: Season of the Witch – aka the one without Michael. It's at least a sign that the creators were consciously going astray. The problem is that it all feels like they had no idea exactly where they were going. It's clearly a film that tries to say something about evil being contagious, and able to spread its toxicity to a whole community (in logical continuity with the previous one), but it's never clever and most of the film's “discourse” passes through badly written dialogue – or worse, Lorie Strode's insufferable Memoirs (“It's up to each of us to not let evil inside” – rewritten thrice to make sure that evil is not Michael Myers, but something more diffused). The opening credits are also inviting to read the film intertextually – and that sure would require watching it a few more times – but it doesn't seem at first look to have much to offer. Corey Cunningham is an effective allusion to Christine, it works. The babysitter is watching The Thing with the kid, which also works and on a few levels: reference to a previous Carpenter movie, empty allusion to the original (where they were watching the original The Thing, creating a somewhat complex network of originals and remakes, cute, but I can't think of an significant return), and, more interestingly, effective allusion to Carpenter's The Thing, where evil spreads and is contagious. It's not dumb at all, and I'm sure there's more, but it feels more like an homage to Carpenter than a really meaningful intertext. As for the film itself, it's pretty bad. To match the themes of past trauma, Laurie Strode's character is suddenly an edgy gandma with a buried past (the lady went forty years preparing to trap and kill a monster she had no reason to believe would be back, going full Sarah Connor, and she suddenly gets over it when she actually knows he's out there and just killed her daughter... really?), which is the most stupid sequel writing I can think of, but also perhaps the only important new element to the story: Laurie the zen grandma is writing her Memoirs. It has to be conscious distanciation and reflexivity: inviting the spectator to consider the process of writing (the sequels and remakes). That's the only way you can defend what's going on in this film: it pushes you back (from the opening credits) and invites you to read it as written material, a metaphor or allegory. It's a very weak and confused one, it doesn't do a great job at anything, but I have to believe it tried. Otherwise, it's just a laughably bad and stupid Halloween film, could just be the worst of all – and I'm really glad it is. From the get go, I couldn't stand Green's trilogy and I was really fed up with people using his 2018 reboot to diminish the Zombie entries. Now, you've got it: these three films were at the level of the worst straight-to-video sequels, but done with greater means. These films just picked from the original ones, from the obsessed doctor, to the hospital sequel, to Myers living in the sewers with the homeless, and did a terrible job at making it feel “better”. Green's terrible direction is also exposed in this one and it's so obvious, when he tries to do drama or romance, when he tries to direct more serious dialogues or voice-over narration, that he lacks the chops to hold everything together – the opposite of Zombie's strong signature. Until I can have a better understanding of what they were trying to invite us to read into this film, I'll rate it as what it is: an extremely poor Halloween sequel. 1.5/10
Halloween (Carpenter, 1978) – I am fully aware this is supposed to be the superior film and bestest slasher ever. It's just not (IMO). I mean, it's still a pretty decent movie, and I still think it is an important slasher and has to be seen by any fan of the genre, but there's so many things that just don't work for me that it's hard not to think it's overrated (I don't think, for example, that it should be considered more important than Black Christmas, nor a better film). Most of all – and I guess it's kind of a “hot take” – Donald Pleasance's Dr Loomis kind of ruins the film. That character is so bad that I can't rewatch Halloween without considering him an accomplice to Myers, and probably the crazier of the pair. I've watched the extended TV version and it only adds to that feeling (his reaction towards a 6 y/o boy (foreshadowing his inexcusable behavior around the little girl in parts 4&5?) certainly aren't that of a psychiatrist). Don't worry, I know the film is not supposed to be read that way, but the guy leaves the hospital car for Myers to escape with, knows instantly where Myers is going, makes one stop during his 150 miles trip to Haddonfield, exactly where Myers stopped to kill someone and steal his overalls, there he manages to find the nurse's matchbox in the grass but not the body that lies three feet away from him, he sends the cop in every and all directions except the right one, he pretends he doesn't see the hospital car at the hardware store, pretends he doesn't see it right next to him the whole time he waits at the Myers house, and he tells the sheriff not to inform the population. The guy is shady, obsessed with a patient that hasn't said a word in 15 years. It's hard to think it's not blanks that he shoots at Myers.
I won't even comment on the fact that the 6 y/o boy who spends 15 years staring at the window without speaking to anyone knows how to drive when he escapes, because it's probably Loomis who taught him. The extended version has the “Sister” marking in Myers' hospital room that introduce the sequel's family twist. I think it kind of saves the day for the killer, who's too easily read as a frustrated incel who follows women around. At some point, he follows Laurie and her friend, in his stolen hospital car, from daylight to darkness, without them noticing him even though they know a weirdo with a stationwagon has been following them. He's bumper to bumper the whole time! This goes with my second big problem with the film: Carpenter's spatial construction. The body in the grass, the car that Loomis doesn't see even though it's right beside him, the doors that don't open the right way, the interiors that don't match the exteriors of the houses, and Laurie's fall in the staircase – nothing works. You have to give it to Carpenter for a few amazing moments (Myers coming out of the shadows, wow, but right after that he tries to stab Laurie and misses her even though she's 3 inches from him and doesn't see him coming, which for some reason pushes her over the handrail and into the stairs), but I just don't think he's that good a director at that time. The robbery at the hardware store is really hard to place in the timeline too. The film has some cool atmosphere at times, but it has so many weaknesses that I have a hard time going over 5.5/10.
Halloween II (Rosenthal, 1981) – It had been a while since I'd seen this one. I usually refer to it as my favorite slasher, and it might just be. The last 30 minutes probably are. The ride to get there is a little bumpy, but this last stretch has Michael Myers at his most threatening (and better looking), and manages to create a dark and claustrophobic atmosphere in the hospital. Dr Loomis even almost looks sane and credible (not really but a lot more than usual) for a few minutes there. The first hour is certainly a lot weaker, with cheap and ineffective “scares” (the cat in the dumpster, the killer behind the closing door – stuff that makes you wonder how few ideas Carpenter was left with), even one that is so weirdly constructed that I had to rewind it a few times (the girl goes towards the door at the right of the frame, something very common to get the spectator's attention to that side of the frame, the jump scare comes from another side, sure, but you have Myers jumping on her from mid-frame as if he was... on the floor?) - but I think it was the only time in this one I had to try to figure out spatial construction, a huge improvement on the original. Some of the kills in the first hour are way too sophisticated for a man who's been locked up since he was 6 years old, but since he somehow learned to drive, I guess he might have pick up some other skills. It's still a little inconsistent with his other range of actions (can't push a door open, walks through it). Points to the sheriff for acknowledging Loomis is in cahoots with Myers. 6/10
Halloween III: Season of the Witch (Wallace, 1982) - Very dark paranoid thriller mixed with decent gore. Gotta love the balls on this one, aiming for the children and not hesitating melting one with critters coming out of his face. The premise is great, the tone is great, but other than that, it's saddly pretty silly. The inexplicable stonehenge mystical bullshit is just too much, and the romance between the fugly womanizer doctor and the young lady who just lost her father the day before is hilarious (the line where she asks him where he'd like to sleep got me laughing out loud). Includes a little sexual harrassment seminar in the workplace with our good doctor slapping the ass of his lady colleague for fun. The film is on Roger Ebert's most hated list, but it's miles better than parts 4, 5, 6, H20, & Resurrection. In fact, I kind of like it. 4.5/10
Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (Little, 1988) - After box office failure and poor fans reception, the halloween anthology films idea that was launched with the third entry was flushed and inevitably, Michael Myers did indeed return. Now, the Halloween series has never been that good with continuity or logic (Myers escapes the loony bin at 21 years old after 15 years locked up but has no problem stealing a car, the first film ends with Loomis shooting Myers 6 times, but the second one begins with Loomis firing 7 shots - and then telling everyone he shot him 6 times, etc.), so it's only natural that after being burned alive and blinded, Myers returns has a dude that can walk around in a store to steal a mask with no problem, or drive a tow truck... This fourth entry is just a below-average slasher, with a very off-putting ending with Tommy Jarvis vibes. It still manages to look "ok" in a very weak series of films. 3/10
Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers (Othenin-Girard, 1989) - The premise of this one is the best of all (on a ridicule scale): after the events of the previous film, a wounded Myers crawls out of danger to a river that leads him to the hideout of a homeless man. He tries to attack him but collapses. One year later, next Halloween, Myers wakes up and kills the guy, who for some reason kept a comatose huge man in his tiny home for a whole year (or was he conscious and friendly this whole time?). Afterwards it's just the same crap, but with added bullshit (telepathy between young female Jarvis and Myers, some strange unidentified cult figure following Myers around) - you know how I like to read stuff into movies, and I'd love to use the fact that the killer is now played by a Native American and try to make the whole occult stuff make sense, but I don't think it's possible. The only good thing about the 5th film is that it confirms Loomis was the real psychopath all along (the only fun I have now revisiting the classic Halloween film is to read it with Loomis as the psychotic mastermind and Myers as his homicidal pet project - always knowing where he'll be, sending cops away from him to clear his path, shooting blanks at him, etc.) - his behavior around the little girl here is just wrong. 2/10
Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (Chappelle, 1995) - The Carpenter film was such a simple story... One sequel after the other (actually starting with the original film's own TV version), people tried to be interesting and "explain" the whys and the hows of Michael Myers, without understanding that all this dumb stuff worked only because it was left unsaid. Now this 6th entry tries to tie up everything that happened before, and tries to make unintelligible stuff make sense. Tommy Doyle, the little boy Laurie was babysitting in the first film, is back and prepared for Michael's return. He moved next door to the Myers house, where Laurie's cousins lives unknowingly (yeah right, all eveybody in this town talks about is Michael Myers, but they wouldn't know they live in his old house) - and why do they live there? Because their uncle - Laurie's father - was the estate agent in charge of selling it (indeed he was in the original film), but never managed to do it, for obvious reason, so his brother made him a favor and moved his family in the murder house. Also, well, that unidentified man in black that followed MM around and ultimately destroyed the police station and killed everyone to free him (where MM was jailed with his mask on, never forget) is revealed to be Loomis' superior from the lunatic ward in the first film. Oh and Jamie was abducted by his cult at the end of part 5 (not in the movie, but believable), and this one starts with her giving birth to a baby marked by evil... That's already a lot, and that's nothing about what actually happens in the film.
Now there's two versions of this film. Different scripts, bickering on the set, a very poor test screening and a lot of changes that went against everybody's wishes and/or understanding of the film. Oh, and Donald Pleasance died before they shot additional material, nothing to help them. Speaking of the devil, Loomis appears a lot more sane than usual, but the theatrical cut ends up with him going back to Michael's body saying he has “a little business to attend to” and they disappear together (pretty much confirming he was only working with him from the beginning!) - the “producers' cut” and much better, the cult leader's powers are transferred to Loomis, making him responsible for MM and all future killer kids (yeah, that's a thing). That cut also includes stuff like a little incest between Michael and his niece, and the cult leader guy working at the ward explaining he was the one who taught Michael how to drive (they really wanted to explain everything with this one – still, Jamie who's been captive since she was 8 also escapes and knows how to drive... I guess it's just something you know). It's really a mess, and not a very good one (despite a few ok-efficient scenes), with missing parts and weird transitions, and some early 90s music video aesthetics here and there. It's still better than parts 4 and 5, and probably better than H20 and, of course, Resurrection... 3/10
Halloween H20: 20 Years Later (Miner, 1998) - I remember absolutely hating this film when it first came out. It's not as amateurish as the 3 previous chapters, but it is on the other hand so formulaic that it feels more like a made-for-TV pastiche than a sequel. Also, intertextuality is an amazing tool to bring depth and meaning to a work, to make a closed narrative reach out to other works for hints and ideas or tone ; Intertextuality is also the worst way to try to make something look cool or smart when it actually isn't. Kevin Williamson doesn't have his name in the writing credits of this film, but it stinks of his empty allusions the whole way through, and it's insufferable. It's really part 7, but they decided to cut all mentions of 4-5-6 and do as if they didn't exist - still, they were in the original screenplay and the new timeline was just some more unnecessary bullcrap. Bringing in Steve Miner was Jamie Lee Curtis' idea, and probably was a good one. I just wish I could go over 3/10.
And for the record, I like Zombie's remakes, the sequel even more than the first one (despite the cheesy white horse and mother crap). As for Resurrection, I think it would fall at 1.5/10 or close to that. It's not "so bad it's good", it's just really bad.
edit:
Halloween (Green, 2018) – This was my initial comment posted here a year ago: Finally catched that one now that it's on Netflix Canada... Never understood how they thought it could be a good idea to, once again, make a sequel to only part of the Halloween films (H20 + H:Resurrection tried that with Jamie Lee Curtis and failed, and now the premise was even worse, also ignoring Halloween II, which is probably the best film of the whole lot, and only to put aside the brother-sister relationship). But no, they had to do it so extra-old Laurie Strode, now with a big "what would Sarah Connor do?" fetish, would get a third timeline (she already died twice!) to go against her non-brother. She has 40 years to prepare and both her trap and her plan are completely dumb. The Zombie films were far superior. 3/10 I'll add that the film tries to do a lot of what the original did, but it always feel clumsy: the no drinking (bad), smoking (bad), sex (bad) thing and the babysitter stuff are just ironic at this point, the crazy obsessed doctor is pushed way beyond the limits of suspension of disbelief (Loomis was already something, this one is ridiculous). There's a few scenes you've already seen in other entries with better execution and results, and I can't get over the fact that it kind of mocks the brother-sister storyline even though it really appeared in (the extended version of) the first film. I still have it at 3/10, but I must push it below H4 and H20 in the overall ranking.
edit 2:
Halloween (Zombie, 2007) – I am well aware that the Zombie remakes have a bad reputation. I am not myself a big fan of the Myers portrayed as a white trash family (and I can't stand Sheri Moon, her suicide scene is absolutely ridiculous!), and I think the background and explanations on the killer's persona are counterproductive in that they diminish the character more than they add to it (I do, on the other hand, appreciate the “love hurts” angle brought to his quest). Still, you can't really argue against the fact that Zombie has the strongest signature of all the directors who played with this material. The result – like it or not – is a lot more coherent as a whole, with clear intent and direction, than every other entries of the series. This first take might not be a great film (it's a very good Halloween film IMO), but it's a brutal film, and a pretty dark slasher. I'm not too sure about that version of Loomis, as much as I've crapped on that character, I still enjoyed his ambivalence (and I must admit I get a kick out of the “These are the eyes of a psychopath” speech, during which Zombie shows us the eyes of Loomis, and not of Michael – also, the “you've became like my best friend” Loomis says to Michael). 4.5/10
Halloween II (Zombie, 2009) – Hard film to rate for me. I understand why most people absolutely hate it. The switch in tone and style, not only from the original series but even from the first film, is somewhat off-putting – and the new elements are either borderline unbearable (the emo/grunge Laurie Strode) or unbearably corny (the wannabe surrealist dream sequences and wannabe Freudian/Jungian imagery). Loomis is nothing more here than a caricature, the vocabulary level is abysmal (f*** f*** f***), and the lead actress is suddenly really bad (she wasn't that bad in the previous one). Still, I like this film a lot! I think the first 22 or 23 minutes are masterful – that's a fifth of the whole film, from which Laurie just wakes up, with no indication that any of it was part of what really happened following the previous film. Not only a pretty ballsy move in itself, but that long dream sequence is in fact introduced by a weird intellectualizing quote about the white horse in opening credits (from a book that I don't think really exists), pointing to the interpretation of dreams. The dream sequence also betrays itself through another intertext (an existing one this time) with the stretching of the Nights In White Satin music video, never reaching the end (brilliant reflexivity). That sequence is also a remake of Halloween II, contained in the sequel to the remake of Halloween. To me, this long introduction to the film is at a level no other slasher ever reached. Add to that some beautiful night shots, a few brilliant dissolves, and directorial amuse-gueules (Annie's murder first told only in sound), and you've got a very special film (I'm also partial to this rendition of Michael Myers as a gritty and brutal force). As clumsy as some of the dream visuals that appear after the introductory dream sequence may be, I think they contribute to the overall oneiric tone of the film. Zombie toyed with the idea of having Laurie as the real killer in the film and Michael only in her imagination, and part of these ideas were kept (the Welcome to my Nighmare tag in her room, notably, but also the dream where she reproduces some of Michael's murders from the first film). This adds a layer of ambiguity to the final film (reinforced by the finale), which might just have added to people's disgust with it but that I think helps making it a more unique horror film. I had it at 6/10 and will keep it there.
edit 3:
Halloween Kills (Green, 2021) – The introduction of the “original characters” in the bar after the bird caller's scary reminder of Haddonfield's murders is so clumsy that you just knew the film would be a disaster. I guess they thought it was fan servicing to bring back a half handful of characters nobody cared about, just to off them for good this time. I liked the 1978 bits and the return of Donald Pleasance, but absolutely hated the 2021 characters and storyline – the vulgar interracial couple, the comic-relief gay couple, and the doctor-nurse black couple were all exhausting reminders that this movie right here was very much of its times. I enjoyed the brutal and merciless version of Michael Myers, akin to the Zombie one, but that's just 10-15 minutes of the film, the rest of it was either working on repetition alone and felt overdone (the whole mob-going-dumb thing was pretty bad, and one more time for the back row: Evil dies tonight!) or undercooked (the rushed 'he made us into monsters' wasn't working at all). It might be better than the previous one by a hair, but only because it got rid of the most ridiculous stuff. 3/10
edit 4:
Halloween Ends (Green, 2022) – The opening credits try to tell you something: this ain't your regular Halloween movie. Not the original's and usual orange font, but the blue one used for Halloween III: Season of the Witch – aka the one without Michael. It's at least a sign that the creators were consciously going astray. The problem is that it all feels like they had no idea exactly where they were going. It's clearly a film that tries to say something about evil being contagious, and able to spread its toxicity to a whole community (in logical continuity with the previous one), but it's never clever and most of the film's “discourse” passes through badly written dialogue – or worse, Lorie Strode's insufferable Memoirs (“It's up to each of us to not let evil inside” – rewritten thrice to make sure that evil is not Michael Myers, but something more diffused). The opening credits are also inviting to read the film intertextually – and that sure would require watching it a few more times – but it doesn't seem at first look to have much to offer. Corey Cunningham is an effective allusion to Christine, it works. The babysitter is watching The Thing with the kid, which also works and on a few levels: reference to a previous Carpenter movie, empty allusion to the original (where they were watching the original The Thing, creating a somewhat complex network of originals and remakes, cute, but I can't think of an significant return), and, more interestingly, effective allusion to Carpenter's The Thing, where evil spreads and is contagious. It's not dumb at all, and I'm sure there's more, but it feels more like an homage to Carpenter than a really meaningful intertext. As for the film itself, it's pretty bad. To match the themes of past trauma, Laurie Strode's character is suddenly an edgy gandma with a buried past (the lady went forty years preparing to trap and kill a monster she had no reason to believe would be back, going full Sarah Connor, and she suddenly gets over it when she actually knows he's out there and just killed her daughter... really?), which is the most stupid sequel writing I can think of, but also perhaps the only important new element to the story: Laurie the zen grandma is writing her Memoirs. It has to be conscious distanciation and reflexivity: inviting the spectator to consider the process of writing (the sequels and remakes). That's the only way you can defend what's going on in this film: it pushes you back (from the opening credits) and invites you to read it as written material, a metaphor or allegory. It's a very weak and confused one, it doesn't do a great job at anything, but I have to believe it tried. Otherwise, it's just a laughably bad and stupid Halloween film, could just be the worst of all – and I'm really glad it is. From the get go, I couldn't stand Green's trilogy and I was really fed up with people using his 2018 reboot to diminish the Zombie entries. Now, you've got it: these three films were at the level of the worst straight-to-video sequels, but done with greater means. These films just picked from the original ones, from the obsessed doctor, to the hospital sequel, to Myers living in the sewers with the homeless, and did a terrible job at making it feel “better”. Green's terrible direction is also exposed in this one and it's so obvious, when he tries to do drama or romance, when he tries to direct more serious dialogues or voice-over narration, that he lacks the chops to hold everything together – the opposite of Zombie's strong signature. Until I can have a better understanding of what they were trying to invite us to read into this film, I'll rate it as what it is: an extremely poor Halloween sequel. 1.5/10
Last edited:
Rob Zombie’s remakes are shit.
The only somewhat cool thing about the first one was the lil’ cliched backstory, showing Michael’s f***ed up home life as a kid, his being bullied as a kid, already displaying psychotic or antisocial behaviours etc. before he snaps on Halloween night.
Whereas obviously we know how the original ‘78 film lacks all of that and starts….with the killing in ‘63 on Halloween night..by…a little kid…you ask??
The only somewhat cool thing about the first one was the lil’ cliched backstory, showing Michael’s f***ed up home life as a kid, his being bullied as a kid, already displaying psychotic or antisocial behaviours etc. before he snaps on Halloween night.
Whereas obviously we know how the original ‘78 film lacks all of that and starts….with the killing in ‘63 on Halloween night..by…a little kid…you ask??
ManwithNoIdentity
Registered User
So hyped for HK
Already got tickets for Thursday night, first time I’ve pre ordered movie tickets in years
Already got tickets for Thursday night, first time I’ve pre ordered movie tickets in years
Love the franchise despite the fact that most of them are garbage. First one was a classic, though dated. I really like H20. It's so 90's and does a lot of paying homage to the original. The last one was also pretty good.
The Halloween Kills looks like it will be a return to awful. I still enjoy the bad ones despite how bad they are.
The Halloween Kills looks like it will be a return to awful. I still enjoy the bad ones despite how bad they are.
I love the first 2 originals.. and I've grown to appreciate 'Season of the Witch' as corny nostalgia.
My opinion, Halloween still has the greatest theme song in movie history..
My opinion, Halloween still has the greatest theme song in movie history..
Nothing will top Halloween: Resurrection for worst, but I didn't like the last one, either. Who decided that there needed to be three generations of Strode women this time (especially since just one has always been enough to stop Michael)? I predict...
...that the middle generation, the mom, will die in this next one (Halloween Kills); then, Laurie will die near the end of the following one (Halloween Ends) just before the youngest Strode finishes off Michael. There... I saved you from having to spend money to watch either of them. 
Last edited:
Rabid Ranger
2 is better than one
I believe the new one is going to be quite the bloodbath. You can never keep Mike down for long though even if his hand was blown off and he was caught in a raging inferno in the last one.
ManwithNoIdentity
Registered User
Honestly kinda surprised that people here hate H18 so much and for things that require suspension of disbelief which is absolutely at the coreof a slasher franchise
That said the brutality and atmosphere in HK were excellent but the dialogue and the way some of the scenes were shot, mainly the town going after Michael caused the film some damage
That said the brutality and atmosphere in HK were excellent but the dialogue and the way some of the scenes were shot, mainly the town going after Michael caused the film some damage
PhillyWings
Registered User
I enjoyed HK, but one particular scene as the movie was reaching it's climax spoiled it for me and felt like zombie was back in the director chair.
Halloween Kills was an absolute dumpster fire, this had to be some of the most unlikeable and downright stupid supporting cast of characters in any movie ever, I was actually rooting for Michael to off everyone.
Besides milking it for more money there's no reason this should have been stretched out into a trilogy, whatever happens in Halloween Ends could have easily happened here.
Besides milking it for more money there's no reason this should have been stretched out into a trilogy, whatever happens in Halloween Ends could have easily happened here.
shadow1
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2008
- 16,729
- 5,526
My favorite horror franchise of all time, but a flawed one.
Its best movies are very strong, but it has some extreme low points (Halloween 5 -> the RZ movies is basically one long 20 year low point). By comparison, the Friday the 13th series doesn't have one stand out movie like the original 1978 Halloween, but the series is more consistently decent.
Without spoiling any plot details, Halloween Kills was a let down. Not a terrible movie, but a downgrade from 2018's Halloween, a movie which breathed life back into the franchise. H:Kills had weird pacing, one needless subplot, a reliance on the "Idiot Plot", and one or two unintentionally funny moments.
My current ranking for the series fresh off the latest entry is:
Halloween (1978)
Halloween (2018)
Halloween II (1981)
Halloween 4 (1988)
Halloween 3 (1983)
Halloween Kills (2021)
Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)
Halloween 5 (1989)
Halloween H20 (1998) *Lower than consensus*
Rob Zombie's Halloween (2007)
Halloween: Resurrection (2002)
Rob Zombie's Halloween II (2009)
Its best movies are very strong, but it has some extreme low points (Halloween 5 -> the RZ movies is basically one long 20 year low point). By comparison, the Friday the 13th series doesn't have one stand out movie like the original 1978 Halloween, but the series is more consistently decent.
Without spoiling any plot details, Halloween Kills was a let down. Not a terrible movie, but a downgrade from 2018's Halloween, a movie which breathed life back into the franchise. H:Kills had weird pacing, one needless subplot, a reliance on the "Idiot Plot", and one or two unintentionally funny moments.
My current ranking for the series fresh off the latest entry is:
Halloween (1978)
Halloween (2018)
Halloween II (1981)
Halloween 4 (1988)
Halloween 3 (1983)
Halloween Kills (2021)
Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)
Halloween 5 (1989)
Halloween H20 (1998) *Lower than consensus*
Rob Zombie's Halloween (2007)
Halloween: Resurrection (2002)
Rob Zombie's Halloween II (2009)
Pranzo Oltranzista
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 3,981
- 2,900
Ouch. I think I might go as far as ranking Zombie's H2 just below the original H2, and thus just above the original original H - I'd need to see it again to decide if the cheezy stuff is enough to push it to third place, but it's certainly not last. The hospital sequence is better than pretty much everything else in the series IMO.
I haven't seen HK, so:
1. H2
2 (?). Zombie's H2
3. H
-
4. H3
5. Zombie's H
-
6. H Curse
7. H 2018
8. H4
9. H20
-
10. H5
-
-
11. H Resurrection
I didn't like 'Kills' (not a surprise, since I didn't like the 2018 movie, either) and wrote my thoughts in the movie review thread a couple of nights ago. Something to add, though, is that I read a review that pointed out that the original Halloween had only 5 kills while 'Kills' lives up to its name with the most of any movie in the franchise (25). That may point to one reason why reviews are so mixed. People hoping for terror and suspense are being disappointed, while people wanting blood and gore are being satisfied. There's more to it than that, but how much you insist on holding it up to the original (or even the 2018 movie) may play a big role in how much you'll like it.
Edit: Since it's now maybe hard to find, I'll just duplicate my review here:
Edit: Since it's now maybe hard to find, I'll just duplicate my review here:
Wearing a Christmas sweater on Halloween to confuse Michael Myers... clever
Halloween Kills (2021) - 3/10 (Really disliked it)
Michael Myers is alive... again... and looking to celebrate with his favorite pastime: killing strangers on Halloween. It picks up later the same night as the 2018 movie and ends with seemingly more to come from that night in next year's conclusion. So, is there a point to this middle act besides stretching things out to a trilogy to make more money? It didn't feel like it to me. There's really no story, much less one that explains anything in the first movie or sets up anything to be resolved in the third. The heroes from the first movie spend most of this one in the hospital, not running from or after Michael. That, more than anything, gave me the sense that the writers were stalling. While they're chilling and delivering exposition in the hospital, the movie introduces new characters just to eventually kill them off. They have no depth and make illogical decisions, like the guy who hurries his girlfriend out of a bar because they just saw on the news that a killer was on the loose, but then goes back inside because he forgot part of his silly Halloween costume, leaving her alone in the parking lot. Then, there are the people knowingly living in Michael's childhood home who suspect that a bloodied intruder is inside and bravely go searching for him. There's also a man who incites town folk to rise up against Michael in what seems to be a commentary on mob justice that might've worked better if it were even possible that we're the monsters, not the undead evil that's killed over 40 people. The movie jumps around between such characters instead of following a few main ones through an actual plot. It's an unstructured mess and one that I didn't even find the least bit tense or scary. There are brutal attacks and kills, but no atmosphere or suspense in between them. The best parts of the movie are, unsurprisingly, the ones that evoke the original, especially the scenes that take place in 1978 and whenever Carpenter's original theme music plays. Those few moments and some nice kills couldn't save the movie from feeling like mostly filler to me, and not well written filler, either. It does feel like a 'Halloween' movie, and that may be enough for a lot of people, but I couldn't get over just how lazy and unnecessary it seemed. In fact, I imagine that you could skip it and not feel like you missed much when next year's conclusion comes out.
Last edited:
ManwithNoIdentity
Registered User
Slasher franchises are a mixed bag and I’m a glutton for punishment so that’s probably why I like them so much
Honestly the only one I don’t get any enjoyment or entertainment value from is the first Rob Zombie one, the rest I watch at least twice a year
Honestly the only one I don’t get any enjoyment or entertainment value from is the first Rob Zombie one, the rest I watch at least twice a year
ManwithNoIdentity
Registered User
Interesting list! I’d put 6 above H3, and then H20 below that so our likes aren’t all that different
I loved the movie itself, it’s basically Halloween on steroids but unfortunately once you start to add up all the little problems it becomes a pile
I will still re-watch this series yearly and faithfully go see every entry in theater so I’m not in complete denial, pretty much the only genre I really enjoy are horror movies or crime/mob dramas
Question, was it just me or was that mob scene shot really weird? It looked awkward as hell on camera, like they were inserts and yeah, they had to dumb down the characters to make certain things work and I hate when horror movies do that
PK Cronin
Bailey Fan Club Prez
- Feb 11, 2013
- 34,533
- 23,964
Nothing will top Halloween: Resurrection for worst, but I didn't like the last one, either. Who decided that there needed to be three generations of Strode women this time (especially since just one has always been enough to stop Michael)? I predict......that the middle generation, the mom, will die in this next one (Halloween Kills); then, Laurie will die near the end of the following one (Halloween Ends) just before the youngest Strode finishes off Michael. There... I saved you from having to spend money to watch either of them.
Resurrection is so much fun though! For me at least (it's objectively terrible). The last installment was just not bad enough to reach the same level of fun, but I still like watching people get hacked and what moronic stories they come up with to keep this thing going. I have a date to see Halloween Kills on Sunday, I'm really looking forward to it still, even with your spoiler.
alko
Registered User
shadow1
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2008
- 16,729
- 5,526
Yeah, it was a strangely shot scene.
My initial thoughts may be too harsh and I may like it better over time. Even though I complained about it, I think it's a solid entry in the series.
I also like Halloween 6 a lot (both theatrical and producers cut). I know the plot is a mess, but the Myers mask/portrayal is very good, and I like the darker/mean spirited atmosphere. I particularly like the tunnel chase towards the end.
shadow1
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2008
- 16,729
- 5,526
ManwithNoIdentity
Registered User
'Halloween Kills' cuts down the competition at the U.S. box office
It is doing shockingly well at the box office too, considering the budget was only 20 million
It is doing shockingly well at the box office too, considering the budget was only 20 million
PK Cronin
Bailey Fan Club Prez
- Feb 11, 2013
- 34,533
- 23,964
You're 100% correct.
This movie was a complete piece of shit and I'm not sure how anyone enjoyed it as a horror movie. I enjoyed seeing it because it was utter shit. There are huge sections of the movie that aren't even needed and don't really go anywhere at all.
- The amount of times the characters referenced the events from 40 years ago was nauseatingly bad.
- Pretty much every shot from the hospital could've been trashed and it would have only positively impacted the movie.
- Re-introducing characters from the original Halloween night 40 years prior and giving them vengeance storylines actually hurts the storyline for Curtis' family and leads me to wanting all of them to get killed.
- The boyfriend from the 2018 Halloween was a gigantic dick and now we're supposed to be rooting for him without really being given a compelling reason why.
- There was virtually no suspense. The moments you thought Myers would appear, he does. The moments you think everyone is safe, they were.
- Characters kept referencing strength in numbers, but insisted on going places alone, splitting up, or fighting Myers one on one.
- Early in the movie we see Myers take on a group of people all at once, then later the group becomes too much for him, though he eventually regains his strength and f***s them all up. Just a bizarre sequence.
- I know I complained about the hospital already, but holy shit Curtis giving herself morphine was absurd, and her getting the knife was completely pointless for this film. I guess they'll save that for the next one.
KallioWeHardlyKnewYe
Hey! We won!
- May 30, 2003
- 15,771
- 3,808
I've always been more lukewarm on this series as a whole than most. I've always preferred Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th on the whole. I think Halloween has more bad movies than good, while the balance is the other way with the other two even if only slightly. Add to that when the other two are bad, they tend to be entertainingly bad, while bad Halloween is just bad.
That's a different strokes for different folks thing though. Halloween, to its credit, tends to take itself seriously, while competitors spiraled quickly into self-reflexive parody.
For the first time in a while I felt the urge to go back to 4-6 but I just haven't been able to pull the trigger. Maybe next year. I also want to give the Zombie movies another shot because my appreciation for him as a director has turned since I first saw those. But haven't done that yet. So perhaps my feelings on this will evolve.
The matter at hand: Halloween Kills. I actually liked it. It's a messy, sloppy movie but I think very intentionally so. I feel like the internal logic works. Overlapping slightly with the previous movie (which I also liked), everything's moving fast. No one thinks because there isn't much time to. It's not scary in any shock sense, but I think there's a brutal, base tension to it. Slow walking, inexplicable inevitability. I like that it's an unapologetic middle chapter. I appreciate that Laurie is sidelined in this movie (probably not satisfying for some, but it makes sense). She's basically Luke stuck on Dagobah. Red herrings, but no real answers. I suspect it'll work best when it fits alongside the upcoming part 3.
The little nostalgia bits I'm a sucker for: The theme still kills. The opening titles are great. The Season of the Witch masks are a fun little touch. Though I know the original part 2 doesn't exist in this version I liked that this one also centered largely on some hospital based chaos, all be it of a different kind. Nice homage, whether intentional or not.
That's a different strokes for different folks thing though. Halloween, to its credit, tends to take itself seriously, while competitors spiraled quickly into self-reflexive parody.
For the first time in a while I felt the urge to go back to 4-6 but I just haven't been able to pull the trigger. Maybe next year. I also want to give the Zombie movies another shot because my appreciation for him as a director has turned since I first saw those. But haven't done that yet. So perhaps my feelings on this will evolve.
The matter at hand: Halloween Kills. I actually liked it. It's a messy, sloppy movie but I think very intentionally so. I feel like the internal logic works. Overlapping slightly with the previous movie (which I also liked), everything's moving fast. No one thinks because there isn't much time to. It's not scary in any shock sense, but I think there's a brutal, base tension to it. Slow walking, inexplicable inevitability. I like that it's an unapologetic middle chapter. I appreciate that Laurie is sidelined in this movie (probably not satisfying for some, but it makes sense). She's basically Luke stuck on Dagobah. Red herrings, but no real answers. I suspect it'll work best when it fits alongside the upcoming part 3.
The little nostalgia bits I'm a sucker for: The theme still kills. The opening titles are great. The Season of the Witch masks are a fun little touch. Though I know the original part 2 doesn't exist in this version I liked that this one also centered largely on some hospital based chaos, all be it of a different kind. Nice homage, whether intentional or not.
Ad
Latest posts
-
Player Discussion Peyton Krebs C/LW -- Re-signed 2 years, $1.45m AAV- Latest: Sabresfansince1980
-
-
