Well said. I was going to bring this same point up. Gretz didnt get hit because he saw the game 4-5 moves before the other guy did. Trying to line him up would only end as an embarrasment. To think that guys like Tim Hunter and other goons of the 80s were 'afraid' to hit Gretz because he had tough guys on his team is the completely idiotic. Anyone who believes this is an absolute shill for arguing that goons 'police' the sport......another myth that has never been close to true.
Who was Gretzky's protector in all those Canada Cup tournaments where he was the leading scorer? I don't remember Semenko being on any of those teams.
Who was Gretzky's protector in all those Canada Cup tournaments where he was the leading scorer? I don't remember Semenko being on any of those teams.
Well said. I was going to bring this same point up. Gretz didnt get hit because he saw the game 4-5 moves before the other guy did. Trying to line him up would only end as an embarrasment. To think that guys like Tim Hunter and other goons of the 80s were 'afraid' to hit Gretz because he had tough guys on his team is the completely idiotic. Anyone who believes this is an absolute shill for arguing that goons 'police' the sport......another myth that has never been close to true.
Again, the question that no-one wants to answer :
If Gretzky was so well protected in Edmonton by Semenko and this is why he wasn't hit, why was it still impossible to hit Gretzky in the mid-1990s with LA? Different era, instigator rule now in place, Semenko long retired, and still you couldn't hit him. As a Canuck fan, it was beyond frustrating knowing he'd put up a couple assists every night and your team just couldn't do a thing about it.
Additionally, can anyone explain why players would be scared to hit Gretzky on account of Semenko but not scared to hit, say, Steve Yzerman on account of Bob Probert? Every star player in that era had an enforcer on their team. If Gretzky got 'special treatment', then so did every other elite player. The notion that Gretzky got 'different' protection that what any other star got from their enforcer is patently ridiculous.
How many actually insisted on the "enforcer" being part of a trade package? Just because one player got "special treatment" is no certification at all that every other player received it. Gretzky said it himself "I don't believe I would have had as an individual player the same success without Dave Semenko" end of quote.
When I watch Crosby, I am flabbergasted at what he has to put up with compared to other superstars of the past. I've never seen a superstar receive more blatant shots to the face and head than Crosby does.
I find that the Gretzky detractors are usually fans of teams that he burned. (ie. Flames and Leafs fans)
Thinking that the Refs were protecting him by some kind of directive from the league President is such BS that it wreaks with ignorance. Ever hear of anti-trust suits? If there were a conspiracy put forth by the league to protect Gretzky, the NHL would've been brought to its knees by a major lawsuit.
Keep on smokin' Cheech & Chong.
Gretzky played Lacrosse as a kid in the off seasons and that helped him to learn how to roll off of a hit and how to avoid hits. Betchya didn't know that.
He also played in the era where the instigator penalty was not enforced. So yeah, if you hit him, you had Semenko or McClelland or McSorley or sometimes all-three to deal with!
Lemieux also had plenty of body guards and the Bruins weren't exactly a group of choir boys.
Every star player has protection, if they don't then their GM should be looking for a new job.
Agreed completely it's a myth.
The notion that pro athletes wouldn't hit the best player on the other team, and by contrast would just let him walk all over them, because they were cowering in the presence of Semenko and McSorley is ridiculous.
Every team in the league had a Semenko or McSorley. The notion that players were willing to hammer every other 'star' player in the league but not Gretzky in spite of the fact that they were all protected by the same type of enforcer is just stupid.
Gretzky didn't get hit because he was so quick and absolutely brilliant at avoiding hits. You still couldn't hit him in the mid-1990s when he was in his mid-30s and Semenko had been retired for a decade.
Does anyone really think that Risebrough, Peplinski, Baxter, Hunter and the like were scared to hit Gretzky in the Edmonton-Calgary Battle of Alberta games?
Anyone who believes this is an absolute shill for arguing that goons 'police' the sport......another myth that has never been close to true.
In baseball, umpires tended not call 'strike' on pitches that Ted Williams did not swing at. More recently, they tended not call 'ball' on pitches thrown by Greg Maddux, in which the batter did not swing. Unless you're Bill O'Reilly, talk of conpiracy theories don't count form much. All professional sports leagues treat its star players differently, and, yes, there is favoritism. About a decade ago, Vincent Damphousse received a multi-game suspension for a similar infraction, which didn't even get a minor penalty to Mark Messier, who was with the NYR.
Semenko and McSorley were in the roster just to entertain the fans with an occasional fight major? The #1 reason for enforcers is to protect star players. If it was as simple as Gretzky avoiding hits, then there was no reason for Semenko and McSorley to be on the roster. Then, there was the little matter of Gretzky insisting on McSorley following him to LA.
Jim Peplinski and Tim Hunter handled themselves just fine. It was the other types of liberties that were taken, which proved to be the problem for the league. As soon as the instigator rule was removed, then that led to punks crosschecking to the head without fear of retribution from toughguys. Instances of concussions shot up.
Yeah, they're just there for amusement..like loud rock music blasting over the PA system, neon light shows, mascot appearances and prize giveaways.
I don't feel Gretzky had any more or any less protection than the star player on other teams. In many instances, if you're going to take liberties with a team's best player there is another guy that will deal with you.
This is not unique to Wayne Gretzky.
So smarty pants,you don't believe Gretzky,Semenko,Sheehy,Sather etc? So,did it ever happen? Did the "turn the other cheek" Mike Milbury Bruins? You remember that new philosophy Milbury insisted on? Terry O'Reilly's overmatched Bruins who beat the Canadiens for the first time ever? That was the climax of that season and the Edmonton train had a costar named Messier the B's could not match up with. GeezSo you believe that no one on the Bruins or Flyers or Flames etc. etc. was man enough to go ahead and line up Gretz......
I'm not talking about cheap shots, I'm talking about big, clean hits.
They were just too scared they would have to fight Semenko or McSorley.
I can hear it in the locker room now....
"Sorry guys, were just going to have to let them have the Cup. I'm not going to line up Gretz. Don't you realize that I would have to fight a big scary guy if I did that....?....I mean we made the finals, isn't that good enough?"
Yeah.....that makes total sense.
lol
Certainly not. We're talking about a player who is top 3 alltime,very young in the beginning,putting a city on the map,leading a team that would bring the Cup to Canada. The desire,pressure and need to protect this most valuable of assets was immense. They had the man.
The skill of avoiding hits is probably closely tied to having a great hockey sense. Just look at these two clips of Datsyuk: