Hawkaholic
Registered User
He was good for a short time period here, you could definitely see his potential at that time.But it’s not like Forsling was good when he was here. He hadnt figured it out yet. Takes time.
He was good for a short time period here, you could definitely see his potential at that time.But it’s not like Forsling was good when he was here. He hadnt figured it out yet. Takes time.
He was good for a short time period here, you could definitely see his potential at that time.
For fun even those not playing — praying for the return of lance bouma and even tanner kero over some of these guysName an ex-Hawk currently playing, and you have a player that'd easily be among the best on this roster.
Tyler Arnason!For fun even those not playing — praying for the return of lance bouma and even tanner kero over some of these guys
Tyler Arnason!
Has the light finally come on?Alex Nylander 8 goals in his last 11 games.
Probably not.Has the light finally come on?
Alex Nylander 8 goals in his last 11 games.
Popped up on my feed this morning:
Im on board with bringing Kane (2year $5-6 mil)back but I would not put him with bedard. Kane and Bedard are both best with the puck on there stick and they are both not good on the physical side of things. Need some size with Bedard IMO. PP 1 is fine.Kane should be back here next season, putting up 80-100 points right alongside Bedard. Imagine the two of them on the ice together. Christ.
Richardson might put them both on the pp2 with Korchinski...or he might get mad that Tinordi and Megna don't get so many minutes to shine in their own end.Kane should be back here next season, putting up 80-100 points right alongside Bedard. Imagine the two of them on the ice together. Christ.
Kane got a 6.3 mil extension after his ELC at 21 at the time was probably one of the highest AAV's given out after a ELC other then the 10-12 year deals that they outlawed. then they made him the highest paid player in the league for 10.5. Does the hawks owe him or does he owe the hawks? you can say what you want about Rocky and stan they paid the core very very well. In your scenario should Toews and SEABS pay the hawks back for they brutal return we got on those deals?Richardson might put them both on the pp2 with Korchinski...or he might get mad that Tinordi and Megna don't get so many minutes to shine in their own end.
At some point even Richardson wouldn't keep them separated though.
I'm completely on board for Kane x 4 and way too much AAV. Pay him back for making him spend that year on a bad hip. Much of the roster will still be cost controlled years through 29.
I would be shocked if it happened thou
Part of the high payment was about timing too. They saw success in early extensions in Detroit, despite maybe high numbers and hey didn't want the uncertainty looming, especially after LA/Doughty impasse was a about 4 periods from blowing the whole thing up and selling the franchise.Kane got a 6.3 mil extension after his ELC at 21 at the time was probably one of the highest AAV's given out after a ELC other then the 10-12 year deals that they outlawed. then they made him the highest paid player in the league for 10.5. Does the hawks owe him or does he owe the hawks? you can say what you want about Rocky and stan they paid the core very very well. In your scenario should Toews and SEABS pay the hawks back for they brutal return we got on those deals?