Leaftors
Registered User
I don’t see how we’d be in on quick, unless we wanted something else and LA was like - Only if you take quick
Yeah, maybe another team will.Trade Mkt. will be set soon, but even then we always see a wide range of expected returns for any given player(s) each yr.
LGD=late 2nd or late 3rd+b-level prospect (C/LD).
**He may fetch a late 1st in a small bidding war, TBD**
If Dubas doesn't pay, another team will. We're ok resigning LGD too (now or in ufa)
this isnt 2012. Quick doesnt hold that much valueLeafs would have to add a lot. First and a top prospect?
yeah, i really have no interest. would rather look for a long term option, or someone not as old and expensive to share duties with Campbell.Jonathan quick at 2.9 million for three more years is still a massive cap dump. He has been a .900 goalie for years now.
If the kings are dumping quick (at 2.9) the are the ones adding assets.
Quick was nothing short of outstanding in that series against the knights. Seriously, he was the only reason that series was somewhat close. It was an impressive performance.I know he’s not amazing in the regular season but doesn’t he to some extent step up in the playoffs? Was he not okay against the Knights a few years back or was his teams lack of scoring primary ?
If we are taking on quick (even at full retention) , they better be throwing in a very useful piece for the leafs.yeah, i really have no interest. would rather look for a long term option, or someone not as old and expensive to share duties with Campbell.
would be funny to roll Quick-Campbell and become the Toronto Maple Kings though
Quick was nothing short of outstanding in that series against the knights. Seriously, he was the only reason that series was somewhat close. It was an impressive performance.
Fourth Period has never broken anythingAccording to The Fourth Period who have broken things like the Tavares to the Leafs are now reporting that the Leafs and Kings have spoken about the possibility of Jonathan Quick being traded to Toronto.
Freddy would have to go back and the Kings would probably have retain a portion of Quick but what do you think a deal would look like?
Fourth Period has never broken anything
Yes, this. The king's are not in the business of helping the Leafs or any other team. Not, are the Leafs in the business of helping the king's or any other team.The other side of this coin is that there is not one thing mentioned here that would make the Kings trade Quick to the Leafs. They are not sending him to the Leafs, with retention, for Anderson and whatever scraps you want to get rid of, forget that. They would be better served to keep Quick, and they have the cap space to do it. With a lot more cap space next season. The Kings are not in business to help out the Leafs and I don't really see a trade that makes sense between the two teams.
Would the kings take a forward? I can’t remember if Dubas said he’d trade a top forward prospect or a top prospect generally, but he’s willing to give up a valuable asset regardless ; idk what the kings need this year specifically I just remember it seems like every year “the kings can’t score” (or maybe that was a few years ago)The other side of this coin is that there is not one thing mentioned here that would make the Kings trade Quick to the Leafs. They are not sending him to the Leafs, with retention, for Anderson and whatever scraps you want to get rid of, forget that. They would be better served to keep Quick, and they have the cap space to do it. With a lot more cap space next season. The Kings are not in business to help out the Leafs and I don't really see a trade that makes sense between the two teams.