The Era of "Superteams"...? | Page 6 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

The Era of "Superteams"...?

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
Arguing for the removal of the salary cap and return to pre-2005 type of NHL is something I understand. As a Wings fan, those were fun days.

However, that's a completely different type of league. Right now, there is a salary cap. In a league with a salary cap, the cap should work as intended. Right now, I don't believe it does.
The NHL CBA is just an agreement between the NHL and NHLPA where both sides get some things that they wanted. Fans were not at the table. So, for example, the NHL got "cost certainty" and the players got earlier UFA

"Parity" is just how they sold the lockouts to the fans
 
This generation of Canadian GMs lack intelligence and perseverance. Bunch of entitled dudes who can't build shit themselves.

There are indeed a bunch of mediocre GMs out there but that trend doesn't end with any borders.

American players have definitely shown an entitlement trend that you don't see with other nationalities.
 
There are indeed a bunch of mediocre GMs out there but that trend doesn't end with any borders.

American players have definitely shown an entitlement trend that you don't see with other nationalities.
I don't know what you mean by entitlement here. Did any of these American players refuse to play up to their contracts? Or did they simply tell these organizations that drafted them that they weren't going to extend/resign with them? Even Larkin could only submit a request to be traded, he can't actually enforce it. These franchises already get the better part of the first decade of these player's careers without any decision from the player, and the teams can trade these players for any reason before their UFA years. By the time any player is approaching UFA, he's either already been traded or has had team mates traded who had no say in the matter. They just had to pack up, move to another city, and start being loyal to some other franchise.

It's much more entitled to think a player who never chose your organization should be obligated to stay than it is for a player to make known that he doesn't want to stay with your organization past his current contract. If you want players to stay, build a competitive team. It's not like Americans, or anyone else, are requesting trades out of Montreal.
 
I don't know what you mean by entitlement here. Did any of these American players refuse to play up to their contracts? Or did they simply tell these organizations that drafted them that they weren't going to extend/resign with them? Even Larkin could only submit a request to be traded, he can't actually enforce it. These franchises already get the better part of the first decade of these player's careers without any decision from the player, and the teams can trade these players for any reason before their UFA years. By the time any player is approaching UFA, he's either already been traded or has had team mates traded who had no say in the matter. They just had to pack up, move to another city, and start being loyal to some other franchise.

It's much more entitled to think a player who never chose your organization should be obligated to stay than it is for a player to make known that he doesn't want to stay with your organization past his current contract. If you want players to stay, build a competitive team. It's not like Americans, or anyone else, are requesting trades out of Montreal.

What I'm calling out is their unwillingness to build something (I don't care which team its with). Instead, they all just want to hop on some preexisting Stanley Cup contender.

They could be recruiting their peers to join them but they'd rather hitch themself to an established wagon and take the easy path.
 
Why do you think cap is not working as intended? What aspects of cap do you think are failing to meet in its objectives?
I think it's pretty clear that currently we're in an era with explosive cap growth, combined with league expansion, which has lead to there being more money than there are players to spend it on. How many teams actually spent to the cap last season? How many will do it next season?
The salary cap was intended to limit the amount of money the big markets and top teams can spend. You shouldn't be able to go to several straight cup finals and still re-sign all your players like Florida did. You shouldn't be able to cruise to a cup win like Carolina and have zero cap issues in the offseason. You shouldn't have dozens of teams willing to spend but unable to do so because there's not talent shaking loose.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad